Cargando…

Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers

Recent evidence suggested that parafoveal preprocessing develops early during reading acquisition, that is, young readers profit from valid parafoveal information and exhibit a resultant preview benefit. For young readers, however, it is unknown whether the processing demands of the currently fixate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marx, Christina, Hawelka, Stefan, Schuster, Sarah, Hutzler, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41602
_version_ 1782503329503379456
author Marx, Christina
Hawelka, Stefan
Schuster, Sarah
Hutzler, Florian
author_facet Marx, Christina
Hawelka, Stefan
Schuster, Sarah
Hutzler, Florian
author_sort Marx, Christina
collection PubMed
description Recent evidence suggested that parafoveal preprocessing develops early during reading acquisition, that is, young readers profit from valid parafoveal information and exhibit a resultant preview benefit. For young readers, however, it is unknown whether the processing demands of the currently fixated word modulate the extent to which the upcoming word is parafoveally preprocessed – as it has been postulated (for adult readers) by the foveal load hypothesis. The present study used the novel incremental boundary technique to assess whether 4(th) and 6(th) Graders exhibit an effect of foveal load. Furthermore, we attempted to distinguish the foveal load effect from the spillover effect. These effects are hard to differentiate with respect to the expected pattern of results, but are conceptually different. The foveal load effect is supposed to reflect modulations of the extent of parafoveal preprocessing, whereas the spillover effect reflects the ongoing processing of the previous word whilst the reader’s fixation is already on the next word. The findings revealed that the young readers did not exhibit an effect of foveal load, but a substantial spillover effect. The implications for previous studies with adult readers and for models of eye movement control in reading are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5282480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52824802017-02-03 Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers Marx, Christina Hawelka, Stefan Schuster, Sarah Hutzler, Florian Sci Rep Article Recent evidence suggested that parafoveal preprocessing develops early during reading acquisition, that is, young readers profit from valid parafoveal information and exhibit a resultant preview benefit. For young readers, however, it is unknown whether the processing demands of the currently fixated word modulate the extent to which the upcoming word is parafoveally preprocessed – as it has been postulated (for adult readers) by the foveal load hypothesis. The present study used the novel incremental boundary technique to assess whether 4(th) and 6(th) Graders exhibit an effect of foveal load. Furthermore, we attempted to distinguish the foveal load effect from the spillover effect. These effects are hard to differentiate with respect to the expected pattern of results, but are conceptually different. The foveal load effect is supposed to reflect modulations of the extent of parafoveal preprocessing, whereas the spillover effect reflects the ongoing processing of the previous word whilst the reader’s fixation is already on the next word. The findings revealed that the young readers did not exhibit an effect of foveal load, but a substantial spillover effect. The implications for previous studies with adult readers and for models of eye movement control in reading are discussed. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5282480/ /pubmed/28139718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41602 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Marx, Christina
Hawelka, Stefan
Schuster, Sarah
Hutzler, Florian
Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers
title Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers
title_full Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers
title_fullStr Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers
title_full_unstemmed Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers
title_short Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers
title_sort foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41602
work_keys_str_mv AT marxchristina fovealprocessingdifficultydoesnotaffectparafovealpreprocessinginyoungreaders
AT hawelkastefan fovealprocessingdifficultydoesnotaffectparafovealpreprocessinginyoungreaders
AT schustersarah fovealprocessingdifficultydoesnotaffectparafovealpreprocessinginyoungreaders
AT hutzlerflorian fovealprocessingdifficultydoesnotaffectparafovealpreprocessinginyoungreaders