Cargando…

Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats

Echolocating bats face the challenge of actively sensing their environment through their own emissions, while also hearing calls and echoes of nearby conspecifics. How bats mitigate interference is a long-standing question that has both ecological and technological implications, as biosonar systems...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adams, Amanda M., Davis, Kaylee, Smotherman, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41641
_version_ 1782503350708731904
author Adams, Amanda M.
Davis, Kaylee
Smotherman, Michael
author_facet Adams, Amanda M.
Davis, Kaylee
Smotherman, Michael
author_sort Adams, Amanda M.
collection PubMed
description Echolocating bats face the challenge of actively sensing their environment through their own emissions, while also hearing calls and echoes of nearby conspecifics. How bats mitigate interference is a long-standing question that has both ecological and technological implications, as biosonar systems continue to outperform man-made sonar systems in noisy, cluttered environments. We recently showed that perched bats decreased calling rates in groups, displaying a behavioral strategy resembling the back-off algorithms used in artificial communication networks to optimize information throughput at the group level. We tested whether free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) would employ such a coordinated strategy while performing challenging flight maneuvers, and report here that bats navigating obstacles lowered emission rates when hearing artificial playback of another bat’s calls. We measured the impact of acoustic interference on navigation performance and show that the calculated reductions in interference rates are sufficient to reduce interference and improve obstacle avoidance. When bats flew in pairs, each bat responded to the presence of the other as an obstacle by increasing emissions, but hearing the sonar emissions of the nearby bat partially suppressed this response. This behavior supports social cohesion by providing a key mechanism for minimizing mutual interference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5282581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52825812017-02-03 Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats Adams, Amanda M. Davis, Kaylee Smotherman, Michael Sci Rep Article Echolocating bats face the challenge of actively sensing their environment through their own emissions, while also hearing calls and echoes of nearby conspecifics. How bats mitigate interference is a long-standing question that has both ecological and technological implications, as biosonar systems continue to outperform man-made sonar systems in noisy, cluttered environments. We recently showed that perched bats decreased calling rates in groups, displaying a behavioral strategy resembling the back-off algorithms used in artificial communication networks to optimize information throughput at the group level. We tested whether free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) would employ such a coordinated strategy while performing challenging flight maneuvers, and report here that bats navigating obstacles lowered emission rates when hearing artificial playback of another bat’s calls. We measured the impact of acoustic interference on navigation performance and show that the calculated reductions in interference rates are sufficient to reduce interference and improve obstacle avoidance. When bats flew in pairs, each bat responded to the presence of the other as an obstacle by increasing emissions, but hearing the sonar emissions of the nearby bat partially suppressed this response. This behavior supports social cohesion by providing a key mechanism for minimizing mutual interference. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5282581/ /pubmed/28139707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41641 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Adams, Amanda M.
Davis, Kaylee
Smotherman, Michael
Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats
title Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats
title_full Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats
title_fullStr Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats
title_full_unstemmed Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats
title_short Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats
title_sort suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41641
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsamandam suppressionofemissionratesimprovessonarperformancebyflyingbats
AT daviskaylee suppressionofemissionratesimprovessonarperformancebyflyingbats
AT smothermanmichael suppressionofemissionratesimprovessonarperformancebyflyingbats