Cargando…
Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats
Echolocating bats face the challenge of actively sensing their environment through their own emissions, while also hearing calls and echoes of nearby conspecifics. How bats mitigate interference is a long-standing question that has both ecological and technological implications, as biosonar systems...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41641 |
_version_ | 1782503350708731904 |
---|---|
author | Adams, Amanda M. Davis, Kaylee Smotherman, Michael |
author_facet | Adams, Amanda M. Davis, Kaylee Smotherman, Michael |
author_sort | Adams, Amanda M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Echolocating bats face the challenge of actively sensing their environment through their own emissions, while also hearing calls and echoes of nearby conspecifics. How bats mitigate interference is a long-standing question that has both ecological and technological implications, as biosonar systems continue to outperform man-made sonar systems in noisy, cluttered environments. We recently showed that perched bats decreased calling rates in groups, displaying a behavioral strategy resembling the back-off algorithms used in artificial communication networks to optimize information throughput at the group level. We tested whether free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) would employ such a coordinated strategy while performing challenging flight maneuvers, and report here that bats navigating obstacles lowered emission rates when hearing artificial playback of another bat’s calls. We measured the impact of acoustic interference on navigation performance and show that the calculated reductions in interference rates are sufficient to reduce interference and improve obstacle avoidance. When bats flew in pairs, each bat responded to the presence of the other as an obstacle by increasing emissions, but hearing the sonar emissions of the nearby bat partially suppressed this response. This behavior supports social cohesion by providing a key mechanism for minimizing mutual interference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5282581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52825812017-02-03 Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats Adams, Amanda M. Davis, Kaylee Smotherman, Michael Sci Rep Article Echolocating bats face the challenge of actively sensing their environment through their own emissions, while also hearing calls and echoes of nearby conspecifics. How bats mitigate interference is a long-standing question that has both ecological and technological implications, as biosonar systems continue to outperform man-made sonar systems in noisy, cluttered environments. We recently showed that perched bats decreased calling rates in groups, displaying a behavioral strategy resembling the back-off algorithms used in artificial communication networks to optimize information throughput at the group level. We tested whether free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) would employ such a coordinated strategy while performing challenging flight maneuvers, and report here that bats navigating obstacles lowered emission rates when hearing artificial playback of another bat’s calls. We measured the impact of acoustic interference on navigation performance and show that the calculated reductions in interference rates are sufficient to reduce interference and improve obstacle avoidance. When bats flew in pairs, each bat responded to the presence of the other as an obstacle by increasing emissions, but hearing the sonar emissions of the nearby bat partially suppressed this response. This behavior supports social cohesion by providing a key mechanism for minimizing mutual interference. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5282581/ /pubmed/28139707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41641 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Adams, Amanda M. Davis, Kaylee Smotherman, Michael Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats |
title | Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats |
title_full | Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats |
title_fullStr | Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats |
title_full_unstemmed | Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats |
title_short | Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats |
title_sort | suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamsamandam suppressionofemissionratesimprovessonarperformancebyflyingbats AT daviskaylee suppressionofemissionratesimprovessonarperformancebyflyingbats AT smothermanmichael suppressionofemissionratesimprovessonarperformancebyflyingbats |