Cargando…

The dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) can be extremely difficult in the absence of culture confirmation. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) adenosine deaminase (ADA) can potentially assist in this regard, although its current value remains unclear. The literature on the usefulness of CSF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ekermans, Pieter, Dusé, Adriano, George, Jaya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28143441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2221-3
_version_ 1782503406463614976
author Ekermans, Pieter
Dusé, Adriano
George, Jaya
author_facet Ekermans, Pieter
Dusé, Adriano
George, Jaya
author_sort Ekermans, Pieter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) can be extremely difficult in the absence of culture confirmation. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) adenosine deaminase (ADA) can potentially assist in this regard, although its current value remains unclear. The literature on the usefulness of CSF ADA in TBM diagnosis is inconsistent, especially from an analytical point of view. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory data relating to all CSF ADA requests during 2009 and 2010 in a South African quaternary healthcare setting was performed. A CSF ADA cut-off for TBM diagnosis was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The performance of CSF ADA in different infective and non-infective categories was assessed. RESULTS: In total, 3548 CSF ADA requests were considered over the 2-year period. Of these, 1490 were for patients for whom both a CSF ADA and a mycobacterial culture were requested. The optimal cut-off was calculated at 2.0 U/L (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.82 – 0.89; p-value < 0.01; sensitivity of 85.9% (95% CI of 77.0 – 92.3) and specificity of 77.7% (95% CI of 75.4 – 79.8%); positive likelihood ratio = 3.85 and negative likelihood ratio = 0.18). At this cut-off 13 TBM cases were missed. CONCLUSION: An optimal cut-off for routine use could not be established as too many TBM cases were missed. Specimen integrity, lack of ADA assay standardisation and overlap in performance of the assay in different diagnostic categories affect interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5282858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52828582017-02-03 The dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis Ekermans, Pieter Dusé, Adriano George, Jaya BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) can be extremely difficult in the absence of culture confirmation. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) adenosine deaminase (ADA) can potentially assist in this regard, although its current value remains unclear. The literature on the usefulness of CSF ADA in TBM diagnosis is inconsistent, especially from an analytical point of view. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory data relating to all CSF ADA requests during 2009 and 2010 in a South African quaternary healthcare setting was performed. A CSF ADA cut-off for TBM diagnosis was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The performance of CSF ADA in different infective and non-infective categories was assessed. RESULTS: In total, 3548 CSF ADA requests were considered over the 2-year period. Of these, 1490 were for patients for whom both a CSF ADA and a mycobacterial culture were requested. The optimal cut-off was calculated at 2.0 U/L (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.82 – 0.89; p-value < 0.01; sensitivity of 85.9% (95% CI of 77.0 – 92.3) and specificity of 77.7% (95% CI of 75.4 – 79.8%); positive likelihood ratio = 3.85 and negative likelihood ratio = 0.18). At this cut-off 13 TBM cases were missed. CONCLUSION: An optimal cut-off for routine use could not be established as too many TBM cases were missed. Specimen integrity, lack of ADA assay standardisation and overlap in performance of the assay in different diagnostic categories affect interpretation. BioMed Central 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5282858/ /pubmed/28143441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2221-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ekermans, Pieter
Dusé, Adriano
George, Jaya
The dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis
title The dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis
title_full The dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis
title_fullStr The dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis
title_full_unstemmed The dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis
title_short The dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis
title_sort dubious value of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase measurement for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28143441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2221-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ekermanspieter thedubiousvalueofcerebrospinalfluidadenosinedeaminasemeasurementforthediagnosisoftuberculousmeningitis
AT duseadriano thedubiousvalueofcerebrospinalfluidadenosinedeaminasemeasurementforthediagnosisoftuberculousmeningitis
AT georgejaya thedubiousvalueofcerebrospinalfluidadenosinedeaminasemeasurementforthediagnosisoftuberculousmeningitis
AT ekermanspieter dubiousvalueofcerebrospinalfluidadenosinedeaminasemeasurementforthediagnosisoftuberculousmeningitis
AT duseadriano dubiousvalueofcerebrospinalfluidadenosinedeaminasemeasurementforthediagnosisoftuberculousmeningitis
AT georgejaya dubiousvalueofcerebrospinalfluidadenosinedeaminasemeasurementforthediagnosisoftuberculousmeningitis