Cargando…

Decision criteria for MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of filamentous fungi using commercial and in-house reference databases

BACKGROUND: Several Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry protocols, which differ in identification criteria, have been developed for mold and dermatophyte identification. Currently, the most widely used approach is Bruker technology, although no consensus conc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Normand, Anne-Cécile, Cassagne, Carole, Gautier, Magali, Becker, Pierre, Ranque, Stéphane, Hendrickx, Marijke, Piarroux, Renaud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28143403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-0937-2
_version_ 1782503409783406592
author Normand, Anne-Cécile
Cassagne, Carole
Gautier, Magali
Becker, Pierre
Ranque, Stéphane
Hendrickx, Marijke
Piarroux, Renaud
author_facet Normand, Anne-Cécile
Cassagne, Carole
Gautier, Magali
Becker, Pierre
Ranque, Stéphane
Hendrickx, Marijke
Piarroux, Renaud
author_sort Normand, Anne-Cécile
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry protocols, which differ in identification criteria, have been developed for mold and dermatophyte identification. Currently, the most widely used approach is Bruker technology, although no consensus concerning the log(score) threshold has been established. Furthermore, it remains unknown how far increasing the number of spots to compare results might improve identification performance. In this study, we used in-house and Bruker reference databases as well as a panel of 422 isolates belonging to 126 species to test various thresholds. Ten distinct identification algorithms requiring one to four spots were tested. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that optimal results were obtained by applying a decisional algorithm in which only the highest score of four spots was taken into account with a 1.7 log(score) threshold. Testing the entire panel enabled identification of 87.41% (in-house database) and 35.15% (Bruker database) of isolates, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 1 at the genus level for both databases as well as 0.89 PPV (in-house database) and 0.72 PPV (Bruker database) at the species level. Applying the same rules to the isolates for which the species were represented by at least three strains in the database enabled identification of 92.1% (in-house database) and 46.6% (Bruker database) of isolates, with 1 PPV at the genus level for both databases as well as 0.95 PPV (in-house database) and 0.93 PPV (Bruker database) at the species level. CONCLUSIONS: Depositing four spots per extract and lowering the threshold to 1.7, a threshold which is notably lower than that recommended for bacterial identification, decreased the number of unidentified specimens without altering the reliability of the accepted results. Nevertheless, regardless of the criteria used for mold and dermatophyte identification, commercial databases require optimization. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-017-0937-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5282874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52828742017-02-03 Decision criteria for MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of filamentous fungi using commercial and in-house reference databases Normand, Anne-Cécile Cassagne, Carole Gautier, Magali Becker, Pierre Ranque, Stéphane Hendrickx, Marijke Piarroux, Renaud BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Several Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry protocols, which differ in identification criteria, have been developed for mold and dermatophyte identification. Currently, the most widely used approach is Bruker technology, although no consensus concerning the log(score) threshold has been established. Furthermore, it remains unknown how far increasing the number of spots to compare results might improve identification performance. In this study, we used in-house and Bruker reference databases as well as a panel of 422 isolates belonging to 126 species to test various thresholds. Ten distinct identification algorithms requiring one to four spots were tested. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that optimal results were obtained by applying a decisional algorithm in which only the highest score of four spots was taken into account with a 1.7 log(score) threshold. Testing the entire panel enabled identification of 87.41% (in-house database) and 35.15% (Bruker database) of isolates, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 1 at the genus level for both databases as well as 0.89 PPV (in-house database) and 0.72 PPV (Bruker database) at the species level. Applying the same rules to the isolates for which the species were represented by at least three strains in the database enabled identification of 92.1% (in-house database) and 46.6% (Bruker database) of isolates, with 1 PPV at the genus level for both databases as well as 0.95 PPV (in-house database) and 0.93 PPV (Bruker database) at the species level. CONCLUSIONS: Depositing four spots per extract and lowering the threshold to 1.7, a threshold which is notably lower than that recommended for bacterial identification, decreased the number of unidentified specimens without altering the reliability of the accepted results. Nevertheless, regardless of the criteria used for mold and dermatophyte identification, commercial databases require optimization. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-017-0937-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5282874/ /pubmed/28143403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-0937-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Normand, Anne-Cécile
Cassagne, Carole
Gautier, Magali
Becker, Pierre
Ranque, Stéphane
Hendrickx, Marijke
Piarroux, Renaud
Decision criteria for MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of filamentous fungi using commercial and in-house reference databases
title Decision criteria for MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of filamentous fungi using commercial and in-house reference databases
title_full Decision criteria for MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of filamentous fungi using commercial and in-house reference databases
title_fullStr Decision criteria for MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of filamentous fungi using commercial and in-house reference databases
title_full_unstemmed Decision criteria for MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of filamentous fungi using commercial and in-house reference databases
title_short Decision criteria for MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of filamentous fungi using commercial and in-house reference databases
title_sort decision criteria for maldi-tof ms-based identification of filamentous fungi using commercial and in-house reference databases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28143403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-0937-2
work_keys_str_mv AT normandannececile decisioncriteriaformalditofmsbasedidentificationoffilamentousfungiusingcommercialandinhousereferencedatabases
AT cassagnecarole decisioncriteriaformalditofmsbasedidentificationoffilamentousfungiusingcommercialandinhousereferencedatabases
AT gautiermagali decisioncriteriaformalditofmsbasedidentificationoffilamentousfungiusingcommercialandinhousereferencedatabases
AT beckerpierre decisioncriteriaformalditofmsbasedidentificationoffilamentousfungiusingcommercialandinhousereferencedatabases
AT ranquestephane decisioncriteriaformalditofmsbasedidentificationoffilamentousfungiusingcommercialandinhousereferencedatabases
AT hendrickxmarijke decisioncriteriaformalditofmsbasedidentificationoffilamentousfungiusingcommercialandinhousereferencedatabases
AT piarrouxrenaud decisioncriteriaformalditofmsbasedidentificationoffilamentousfungiusingcommercialandinhousereferencedatabases