Cargando…

Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic scoring is used to stratify patients with suspected appendicitis into three groups: high, intermediate, and low probability of appendicitis. The stratification can be used for selective imaging to avoid the harms of radiation without compromising diagnostic accuracy. The aim w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sammalkorpi, Henna E., Leppäniemi, Ari, Lantto, Eila, Mentula, Panu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0119-4
_version_ 1782503416219566080
author Sammalkorpi, Henna E.
Leppäniemi, Ari
Lantto, Eila
Mentula, Panu
author_facet Sammalkorpi, Henna E.
Leppäniemi, Ari
Lantto, Eila
Mentula, Panu
author_sort Sammalkorpi, Henna E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnostic scoring is used to stratify patients with suspected appendicitis into three groups: high, intermediate, and low probability of appendicitis. The stratification can be used for selective imaging to avoid the harms of radiation without compromising diagnostic accuracy. The aim was to study how stratification by Adult Appendicitis Score affects diagnostic performance of imaging studies. METHODS: Analysis of 822 patients who underwent diagnostic imaging for suspected appendicitis was made. Adult Appendicitis Score was used to stratify patients into groups of high, intermediate, and low probability of appendicitis. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) was compared between these patient groups. RESULTS: After scoring, pre-test probability of appendicitis ranged from 9-16% in low probability group to 75-79% in high probability group in patients who underwent US or CT. Post-test probability of appendicitis after positive CT was 99, 91, and 75% in high probability, intermediate probability and low probability groups, respectively, p < 0.001. After positive US the respective probabilities were 95, 91 and 42%, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic imaging has limited value in patients with low probability of appendicitis according to Adult Appendicitis Score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5282904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52829042017-02-03 Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score Sammalkorpi, Henna E. Leppäniemi, Ari Lantto, Eila Mentula, Panu World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnostic scoring is used to stratify patients with suspected appendicitis into three groups: high, intermediate, and low probability of appendicitis. The stratification can be used for selective imaging to avoid the harms of radiation without compromising diagnostic accuracy. The aim was to study how stratification by Adult Appendicitis Score affects diagnostic performance of imaging studies. METHODS: Analysis of 822 patients who underwent diagnostic imaging for suspected appendicitis was made. Adult Appendicitis Score was used to stratify patients into groups of high, intermediate, and low probability of appendicitis. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) was compared between these patient groups. RESULTS: After scoring, pre-test probability of appendicitis ranged from 9-16% in low probability group to 75-79% in high probability group in patients who underwent US or CT. Post-test probability of appendicitis after positive CT was 99, 91, and 75% in high probability, intermediate probability and low probability groups, respectively, p < 0.001. After positive US the respective probabilities were 95, 91 and 42%, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic imaging has limited value in patients with low probability of appendicitis according to Adult Appendicitis Score. BioMed Central 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5282904/ /pubmed/28163774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0119-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sammalkorpi, Henna E.
Leppäniemi, Ari
Lantto, Eila
Mentula, Panu
Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score
title Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score
title_full Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score
title_fullStr Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score
title_full_unstemmed Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score
title_short Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score
title_sort performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0119-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sammalkorpihennae performanceofimagingstudiesinpatientswithsuspectedappendicitisafterstratificationwithadultappendicitisscore
AT leppaniemiari performanceofimagingstudiesinpatientswithsuspectedappendicitisafterstratificationwithadultappendicitisscore
AT lanttoeila performanceofimagingstudiesinpatientswithsuspectedappendicitisafterstratificationwithadultappendicitisscore
AT mentulapanu performanceofimagingstudiesinpatientswithsuspectedappendicitisafterstratificationwithadultappendicitisscore