Cargando…

Best anthropometric discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes among white and black adults: A longitudinal ARIC study

OBJECTIVE: To determine which anthropometric measures are the strongest discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes (T2DM) among White and Black males and females in a large U.S. cohort. METHODS: We used Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study data from 12,121 participants aged 45–64 years without...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hardy, Dale S., Stallings, Devita T., Garvin, Jane T., Xu, Hongyan, Racette, Susan B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5283673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28141847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168282
_version_ 1782503532375572480
author Hardy, Dale S.
Stallings, Devita T.
Garvin, Jane T.
Xu, Hongyan
Racette, Susan B.
author_facet Hardy, Dale S.
Stallings, Devita T.
Garvin, Jane T.
Xu, Hongyan
Racette, Susan B.
author_sort Hardy, Dale S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine which anthropometric measures are the strongest discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes (T2DM) among White and Black males and females in a large U.S. cohort. METHODS: We used Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study data from 12,121 participants aged 45–64 years without diabetes at baseline who were followed for over 11 years. Anthropometric measures included a body shape index (ABSI), body adiposity index (BAI), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHR), waist to height ratio (WHtR), and waist to hip to height ratio (WHHR). All anthropometric measures were repeated at each visit and converted to Z-scores. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals adjusted for age were calculated using repeated measures Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Akaike Information Criteria was used to select best-fit models. The magnitude of the hazard ratio effect sizes and the Harrell’s C-indexes were used to rank the highest associations and discriminators, respectively. RESULTS: There were 1,359 incident diabetes cases. Higher values of all anthropometric measures increased the risk for development of T2DM (p < 0.0001) except ABSI, which was not significant in White and Black males. Statistically significant hazard ratios ranged from 1.26–1.63 for males and 1.15–1.88 for females. In general, the largest hazard ratios were those that corresponded to the highest Harrell’s C-Index and lowest Akaike Information Criteria values. Among White and Black males and females, BMI, WC, WHR, and WHtR were comparable in discriminating cases from non-cases of T2DM. ABSI, BAI, and WHHR were inferior discriminators of incident T2DM across all race-gender groups. CONCLUSIONS: BMI, the most commonly used anthropometric measure, and three anthropometric measures that included waist circumference (i.e., WC, WHR, WHtR) were the best anthropometric discriminators of incident T2DM across all race-gender groups in the ARIC cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5283673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52836732017-02-17 Best anthropometric discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes among white and black adults: A longitudinal ARIC study Hardy, Dale S. Stallings, Devita T. Garvin, Jane T. Xu, Hongyan Racette, Susan B. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine which anthropometric measures are the strongest discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes (T2DM) among White and Black males and females in a large U.S. cohort. METHODS: We used Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study data from 12,121 participants aged 45–64 years without diabetes at baseline who were followed for over 11 years. Anthropometric measures included a body shape index (ABSI), body adiposity index (BAI), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHR), waist to height ratio (WHtR), and waist to hip to height ratio (WHHR). All anthropometric measures were repeated at each visit and converted to Z-scores. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals adjusted for age were calculated using repeated measures Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Akaike Information Criteria was used to select best-fit models. The magnitude of the hazard ratio effect sizes and the Harrell’s C-indexes were used to rank the highest associations and discriminators, respectively. RESULTS: There were 1,359 incident diabetes cases. Higher values of all anthropometric measures increased the risk for development of T2DM (p < 0.0001) except ABSI, which was not significant in White and Black males. Statistically significant hazard ratios ranged from 1.26–1.63 for males and 1.15–1.88 for females. In general, the largest hazard ratios were those that corresponded to the highest Harrell’s C-Index and lowest Akaike Information Criteria values. Among White and Black males and females, BMI, WC, WHR, and WHtR were comparable in discriminating cases from non-cases of T2DM. ABSI, BAI, and WHHR were inferior discriminators of incident T2DM across all race-gender groups. CONCLUSIONS: BMI, the most commonly used anthropometric measure, and three anthropometric measures that included waist circumference (i.e., WC, WHR, WHtR) were the best anthropometric discriminators of incident T2DM across all race-gender groups in the ARIC cohort. Public Library of Science 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5283673/ /pubmed/28141847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168282 Text en © 2017 Hardy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hardy, Dale S.
Stallings, Devita T.
Garvin, Jane T.
Xu, Hongyan
Racette, Susan B.
Best anthropometric discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes among white and black adults: A longitudinal ARIC study
title Best anthropometric discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes among white and black adults: A longitudinal ARIC study
title_full Best anthropometric discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes among white and black adults: A longitudinal ARIC study
title_fullStr Best anthropometric discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes among white and black adults: A longitudinal ARIC study
title_full_unstemmed Best anthropometric discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes among white and black adults: A longitudinal ARIC study
title_short Best anthropometric discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes among white and black adults: A longitudinal ARIC study
title_sort best anthropometric discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes among white and black adults: a longitudinal aric study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5283673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28141847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168282
work_keys_str_mv AT hardydales bestanthropometricdiscriminatorsofincidenttype2diabetesamongwhiteandblackadultsalongitudinalaricstudy
AT stallingsdevitat bestanthropometricdiscriminatorsofincidenttype2diabetesamongwhiteandblackadultsalongitudinalaricstudy
AT garvinjanet bestanthropometricdiscriminatorsofincidenttype2diabetesamongwhiteandblackadultsalongitudinalaricstudy
AT xuhongyan bestanthropometricdiscriminatorsofincidenttype2diabetesamongwhiteandblackadultsalongitudinalaricstudy
AT racettesusanb bestanthropometricdiscriminatorsofincidenttype2diabetesamongwhiteandblackadultsalongitudinalaricstudy