Cargando…

Poor Quality for Poor Women? Inequities in the Quality of Antenatal and Delivery Care in Kenya

BACKGROUND: Quality of healthcare is an important determinant of future progress in global health. However, the distributional aspects of quality of care have received inadequate attention. We assessed whether high quality maternal care is equitably distributed by (1) mapping the quality of maternal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Jigyasa, Leslie, Hannah H., Kundu, Francis, Kruk, Margaret E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5283741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28141840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171236
_version_ 1782503542869721088
author Sharma, Jigyasa
Leslie, Hannah H.
Kundu, Francis
Kruk, Margaret E.
author_facet Sharma, Jigyasa
Leslie, Hannah H.
Kundu, Francis
Kruk, Margaret E.
author_sort Sharma, Jigyasa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality of healthcare is an important determinant of future progress in global health. However, the distributional aspects of quality of care have received inadequate attention. We assessed whether high quality maternal care is equitably distributed by (1) mapping the quality of maternal care in facilities located in poorer versus wealthier areas of Kenya; and (2) comparing the quality of maternal care available to Kenyans in and not in poverty. METHODS: We assessed three measures of maternal care quality: facility infrastructure and clinical quality of antenatal care and delivery care, using indicators from the 2010 Kenya Service Provision Assessment (SPA), a standardized facility survey with direct observation of maternal care provision. We calculated poverty of the area served by antenatal or delivery care facilities using the Multidimensional Poverty Index. We used regression analyses and non-parametric tests to assess differences in maternal care quality in facilities located in more and less impoverished areas. We estimated effective coverage with a minimum standard of care for the full population and those in poverty. RESULTS: A total of 564 facilities offering at least one maternal care service were included in this analysis. Quality of maternal care was low, particularly clinical quality of antenatal and delivery care, which averaged 0.52 and 0.58 out of 1 respectively, compared to 0.68 for structural inputs to care. Maternal healthcare quality varied by poverty level: at the facility level, all quality metrics were lowest for the most impoverished areas and increased significantly with greater wealth. Population access to a minimum standard (≥0.75 of 1.00) of quality maternal care was both low and inequitable: only 17% of all women and 8% of impoverished women had access to minimally adequate delivery care. CONCLUSION: The quality of maternal care is low in Kenya, and care available to the impoverished is significantly worse than that for the better off. To achieve the national targets of maternal and neonatal mortality reduction, policy initiatives need to tackle low quality of care, starting with high-poverty areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5283741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52837412017-02-17 Poor Quality for Poor Women? Inequities in the Quality of Antenatal and Delivery Care in Kenya Sharma, Jigyasa Leslie, Hannah H. Kundu, Francis Kruk, Margaret E. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Quality of healthcare is an important determinant of future progress in global health. However, the distributional aspects of quality of care have received inadequate attention. We assessed whether high quality maternal care is equitably distributed by (1) mapping the quality of maternal care in facilities located in poorer versus wealthier areas of Kenya; and (2) comparing the quality of maternal care available to Kenyans in and not in poverty. METHODS: We assessed three measures of maternal care quality: facility infrastructure and clinical quality of antenatal care and delivery care, using indicators from the 2010 Kenya Service Provision Assessment (SPA), a standardized facility survey with direct observation of maternal care provision. We calculated poverty of the area served by antenatal or delivery care facilities using the Multidimensional Poverty Index. We used regression analyses and non-parametric tests to assess differences in maternal care quality in facilities located in more and less impoverished areas. We estimated effective coverage with a minimum standard of care for the full population and those in poverty. RESULTS: A total of 564 facilities offering at least one maternal care service were included in this analysis. Quality of maternal care was low, particularly clinical quality of antenatal and delivery care, which averaged 0.52 and 0.58 out of 1 respectively, compared to 0.68 for structural inputs to care. Maternal healthcare quality varied by poverty level: at the facility level, all quality metrics were lowest for the most impoverished areas and increased significantly with greater wealth. Population access to a minimum standard (≥0.75 of 1.00) of quality maternal care was both low and inequitable: only 17% of all women and 8% of impoverished women had access to minimally adequate delivery care. CONCLUSION: The quality of maternal care is low in Kenya, and care available to the impoverished is significantly worse than that for the better off. To achieve the national targets of maternal and neonatal mortality reduction, policy initiatives need to tackle low quality of care, starting with high-poverty areas. Public Library of Science 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5283741/ /pubmed/28141840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171236 Text en © 2017 Sharma et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sharma, Jigyasa
Leslie, Hannah H.
Kundu, Francis
Kruk, Margaret E.
Poor Quality for Poor Women? Inequities in the Quality of Antenatal and Delivery Care in Kenya
title Poor Quality for Poor Women? Inequities in the Quality of Antenatal and Delivery Care in Kenya
title_full Poor Quality for Poor Women? Inequities in the Quality of Antenatal and Delivery Care in Kenya
title_fullStr Poor Quality for Poor Women? Inequities in the Quality of Antenatal and Delivery Care in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Poor Quality for Poor Women? Inequities in the Quality of Antenatal and Delivery Care in Kenya
title_short Poor Quality for Poor Women? Inequities in the Quality of Antenatal and Delivery Care in Kenya
title_sort poor quality for poor women? inequities in the quality of antenatal and delivery care in kenya
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5283741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28141840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171236
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmajigyasa poorqualityforpoorwomeninequitiesinthequalityofantenatalanddeliverycareinkenya
AT lesliehannahh poorqualityforpoorwomeninequitiesinthequalityofantenatalanddeliverycareinkenya
AT kundufrancis poorqualityforpoorwomeninequitiesinthequalityofantenatalanddeliverycareinkenya
AT krukmargarete poorqualityforpoorwomeninequitiesinthequalityofantenatalanddeliverycareinkenya