Cargando…
Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation?
Computational models of congenital heart disease (CHD) have become increasingly sophisticated over the last 20 years. They can provide an insight into complex flow phenomena, allow for testing devices into patient-specific anatomies (pre-CHD or post-CHD repair) and generate predictive data. This has...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5284484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27798056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310423 |
_version_ | 1782503656811134976 |
---|---|
author | Biglino, Giovanni Capelli, Claudio Bruse, Jan Bosi, Giorgia M Taylor, Andrew M Schievano, Silvia |
author_facet | Biglino, Giovanni Capelli, Claudio Bruse, Jan Bosi, Giorgia M Taylor, Andrew M Schievano, Silvia |
author_sort | Biglino, Giovanni |
collection | PubMed |
description | Computational models of congenital heart disease (CHD) have become increasingly sophisticated over the last 20 years. They can provide an insight into complex flow phenomena, allow for testing devices into patient-specific anatomies (pre-CHD or post-CHD repair) and generate predictive data. This has been applied to different CHD scenarios, including patients with single ventricle, tetralogy of Fallot, aortic coarctation and transposition of the great arteries. Patient-specific simulations have been shown to be informative for preprocedural planning in complex cases, allowing for virtual stent deployment. Novel techniques such as statistical shape modelling can further aid in the morphological assessment of CHD, risk stratification of patients and possible identification of new ‘shape biomarkers’. Cardiovascular statistical shape models can provide valuable insights into phenomena such as ventricular growth in tetralogy of Fallot, or morphological aortic arch differences in repaired coarctation. In a constant move towards more realistic simulations, models can also account for multiscale phenomena (eg, thrombus formation) and importantly include measures of uncertainty (ie, CIs around simulation results). While their potential to aid understanding of CHD, surgical/procedural decision-making and personalisation of treatments is undeniable, important elements are still lacking prior to clinical translation of computational models in the field of CHD, that is, large validation studies, cost-effectiveness evaluation and establishing possible improvements in patient outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5284484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52844842017-02-07 Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation? Biglino, Giovanni Capelli, Claudio Bruse, Jan Bosi, Giorgia M Taylor, Andrew M Schievano, Silvia Heart Review Computational models of congenital heart disease (CHD) have become increasingly sophisticated over the last 20 years. They can provide an insight into complex flow phenomena, allow for testing devices into patient-specific anatomies (pre-CHD or post-CHD repair) and generate predictive data. This has been applied to different CHD scenarios, including patients with single ventricle, tetralogy of Fallot, aortic coarctation and transposition of the great arteries. Patient-specific simulations have been shown to be informative for preprocedural planning in complex cases, allowing for virtual stent deployment. Novel techniques such as statistical shape modelling can further aid in the morphological assessment of CHD, risk stratification of patients and possible identification of new ‘shape biomarkers’. Cardiovascular statistical shape models can provide valuable insights into phenomena such as ventricular growth in tetralogy of Fallot, or morphological aortic arch differences in repaired coarctation. In a constant move towards more realistic simulations, models can also account for multiscale phenomena (eg, thrombus formation) and importantly include measures of uncertainty (ie, CIs around simulation results). While their potential to aid understanding of CHD, surgical/procedural decision-making and personalisation of treatments is undeniable, important elements are still lacking prior to clinical translation of computational models in the field of CHD, that is, large validation studies, cost-effectiveness evaluation and establishing possible improvements in patient outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-01-15 2016-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5284484/ /pubmed/27798056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310423 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Review Biglino, Giovanni Capelli, Claudio Bruse, Jan Bosi, Giorgia M Taylor, Andrew M Schievano, Silvia Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation? |
title | Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation? |
title_full | Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation? |
title_fullStr | Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation? |
title_short | Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation? |
title_sort | computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5284484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27798056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biglinogiovanni computationalmodellingforcongenitalheartdiseasehowfararewefromclinicaltranslation AT capelliclaudio computationalmodellingforcongenitalheartdiseasehowfararewefromclinicaltranslation AT brusejan computationalmodellingforcongenitalheartdiseasehowfararewefromclinicaltranslation AT bosigiorgiam computationalmodellingforcongenitalheartdiseasehowfararewefromclinicaltranslation AT taylorandrewm computationalmodellingforcongenitalheartdiseasehowfararewefromclinicaltranslation AT schievanosilvia computationalmodellingforcongenitalheartdiseasehowfararewefromclinicaltranslation |