Cargando…

Ethnic Minorities’ Impression Management in the Interview: Helping or Hindering?

Cross-cultural impression management (IM) has not been considered much, which is remarkable given the fast rate at which the labor market is becoming multicultural. This study investigated whether ethnic minorities and majorities differed in their preference for IM-tactics and how this affected ethn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Derous, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5285377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203211
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00086
_version_ 1782503830801350656
author Derous, Eva
author_facet Derous, Eva
author_sort Derous, Eva
collection PubMed
description Cross-cultural impression management (IM) has not been considered much, which is remarkable given the fast rate at which the labor market is becoming multicultural. This study investigated whether ethnic minorities and majorities differed in their preference for IM-tactics and how this affected ethnic minorities’ interview outcomes. A preliminary study (focus groups/survey) showed that ethnic minorities (i.e., Arab/Moroccans) preferred ‘entitlements’ whereas majorities (i.e., Flemish/Belgians) preferred ‘opinion conformity’ as IM-tactics. An experimental follow-up study among 163 ethnic majority raters showed no main effect of IM-tactics on interview ratings. Ethnic minorities’ use of IM-tactics only affected interview ratings if rater characteristics were considered. Specifically, interview ratings were higher when ethnic minorities used opinion conformity (i.e., majority-preferred IM-tactic) and lower when minorities used entitlements (i.e., minority-preferred IM-tactic) if recruiters were high in social dominance orientation, and when they felt more experienced/proficient with interviewing. IM-tactics are a human capital factor that might help applicants to increase their job chances on the labor market. It is concluded that ethnic minority applicants’ preferences for certain IM-tactics might lead to bias even in structured interview settings, but that this depends on ethnic majority recruiters’ interview experience and ingroup/outgroup attitudes. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5285377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52853772017-02-15 Ethnic Minorities’ Impression Management in the Interview: Helping or Hindering? Derous, Eva Front Psychol Psychology Cross-cultural impression management (IM) has not been considered much, which is remarkable given the fast rate at which the labor market is becoming multicultural. This study investigated whether ethnic minorities and majorities differed in their preference for IM-tactics and how this affected ethnic minorities’ interview outcomes. A preliminary study (focus groups/survey) showed that ethnic minorities (i.e., Arab/Moroccans) preferred ‘entitlements’ whereas majorities (i.e., Flemish/Belgians) preferred ‘opinion conformity’ as IM-tactics. An experimental follow-up study among 163 ethnic majority raters showed no main effect of IM-tactics on interview ratings. Ethnic minorities’ use of IM-tactics only affected interview ratings if rater characteristics were considered. Specifically, interview ratings were higher when ethnic minorities used opinion conformity (i.e., majority-preferred IM-tactic) and lower when minorities used entitlements (i.e., minority-preferred IM-tactic) if recruiters were high in social dominance orientation, and when they felt more experienced/proficient with interviewing. IM-tactics are a human capital factor that might help applicants to increase their job chances on the labor market. It is concluded that ethnic minority applicants’ preferences for certain IM-tactics might lead to bias even in structured interview settings, but that this depends on ethnic majority recruiters’ interview experience and ingroup/outgroup attitudes. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5285377/ /pubmed/28203211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00086 Text en Copyright © 2017 Derous. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Derous, Eva
Ethnic Minorities’ Impression Management in the Interview: Helping or Hindering?
title Ethnic Minorities’ Impression Management in the Interview: Helping or Hindering?
title_full Ethnic Minorities’ Impression Management in the Interview: Helping or Hindering?
title_fullStr Ethnic Minorities’ Impression Management in the Interview: Helping or Hindering?
title_full_unstemmed Ethnic Minorities’ Impression Management in the Interview: Helping or Hindering?
title_short Ethnic Minorities’ Impression Management in the Interview: Helping or Hindering?
title_sort ethnic minorities’ impression management in the interview: helping or hindering?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5285377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203211
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00086
work_keys_str_mv AT derouseva ethnicminoritiesimpressionmanagementintheinterviewhelpingorhindering