Cargando…

Impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 T prostate MRI on image quality and cancer detection rate

This work aims to assess the impact of an additional endorectal coil on image quality and cancer detection rate within the same patients. At a single academic medical center, this transversal study included 41 men who underwent T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T using surface coils only or in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gawlitza, Josephin, Reiss-Zimmermann, Martin, Thörmer, Gregor, Schaudinn, Alexander, Linder, Nicolas, Garnov, Nikita, Horn, Lars-Christian, Minh, Do Hoang, Ganzer, Roman, Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe, Kahn, Thomas, Moche, Michael, Busse, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28145525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40640
_version_ 1782503999265570816
author Gawlitza, Josephin
Reiss-Zimmermann, Martin
Thörmer, Gregor
Schaudinn, Alexander
Linder, Nicolas
Garnov, Nikita
Horn, Lars-Christian
Minh, Do Hoang
Ganzer, Roman
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
Kahn, Thomas
Moche, Michael
Busse, Harald
author_facet Gawlitza, Josephin
Reiss-Zimmermann, Martin
Thörmer, Gregor
Schaudinn, Alexander
Linder, Nicolas
Garnov, Nikita
Horn, Lars-Christian
Minh, Do Hoang
Ganzer, Roman
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
Kahn, Thomas
Moche, Michael
Busse, Harald
author_sort Gawlitza, Josephin
collection PubMed
description This work aims to assess the impact of an additional endorectal coil on image quality and cancer detection rate within the same patients. At a single academic medical center, this transversal study included 41 men who underwent T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T using surface coils only or in combination with an endorectal coil in the same session. Two blinded readers (A and B) randomly evaluated all image data in separate sessions. Image quality with respect to localization and staging was rated on a five-point scale. Lesions were classified according to their prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) score version 1. Standard of reference was provided by whole-mount step-section analysis. Mean image quality scores averaged over all localization-related items were significantly higher with additional endorectal coil for both readers (p < 0.001), corresponding staging-related items were only higher for reader B (p < 0.001). With an endorectal coil, the rate of correctly detecting cancer per patient was significantly higher for reader B (p < 0.001) but not for reader A (p = 0.219). The numbers of histologically confirmed tumor lesions were rather similar for both settings. The subjectively rated 3-T image quality was improved with an endorectal coil. In terms of diagnostic performance, the use of an additional endorectal coil was not superior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5286427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52864272017-02-06 Impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 T prostate MRI on image quality and cancer detection rate Gawlitza, Josephin Reiss-Zimmermann, Martin Thörmer, Gregor Schaudinn, Alexander Linder, Nicolas Garnov, Nikita Horn, Lars-Christian Minh, Do Hoang Ganzer, Roman Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe Kahn, Thomas Moche, Michael Busse, Harald Sci Rep Article This work aims to assess the impact of an additional endorectal coil on image quality and cancer detection rate within the same patients. At a single academic medical center, this transversal study included 41 men who underwent T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T using surface coils only or in combination with an endorectal coil in the same session. Two blinded readers (A and B) randomly evaluated all image data in separate sessions. Image quality with respect to localization and staging was rated on a five-point scale. Lesions were classified according to their prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) score version 1. Standard of reference was provided by whole-mount step-section analysis. Mean image quality scores averaged over all localization-related items were significantly higher with additional endorectal coil for both readers (p < 0.001), corresponding staging-related items were only higher for reader B (p < 0.001). With an endorectal coil, the rate of correctly detecting cancer per patient was significantly higher for reader B (p < 0.001) but not for reader A (p = 0.219). The numbers of histologically confirmed tumor lesions were rather similar for both settings. The subjectively rated 3-T image quality was improved with an endorectal coil. In terms of diagnostic performance, the use of an additional endorectal coil was not superior. Nature Publishing Group 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5286427/ /pubmed/28145525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40640 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Gawlitza, Josephin
Reiss-Zimmermann, Martin
Thörmer, Gregor
Schaudinn, Alexander
Linder, Nicolas
Garnov, Nikita
Horn, Lars-Christian
Minh, Do Hoang
Ganzer, Roman
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
Kahn, Thomas
Moche, Michael
Busse, Harald
Impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 T prostate MRI on image quality and cancer detection rate
title Impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 T prostate MRI on image quality and cancer detection rate
title_full Impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 T prostate MRI on image quality and cancer detection rate
title_fullStr Impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 T prostate MRI on image quality and cancer detection rate
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 T prostate MRI on image quality and cancer detection rate
title_short Impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 T prostate MRI on image quality and cancer detection rate
title_sort impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 t prostate mri on image quality and cancer detection rate
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28145525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40640
work_keys_str_mv AT gawlitzajosephin impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT reisszimmermannmartin impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT thormergregor impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT schaudinnalexander impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT lindernicolas impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT garnovnikita impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT hornlarschristian impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT minhdohoang impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT ganzerroman impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT stolzenburgjensuwe impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT kahnthomas impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT mochemichael impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate
AT busseharald impactoftheuseofanendorectalcoilfor3tprostatemrionimagequalityandcancerdetectionrate