Cargando…

Dominant role of plant physiology in trend and variability of gross primary productivity in North America

Annual gross primary productivity (GPP) varies considerably due to climate-induced changes in plant phenology and physiology. However, the relative importance of plant phenology and physiology on annual GPP variation is not clear. In this study, a Statistical Model of Integrated Phenology and Physio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Sha, Zhang, Yao, Ciais, Philippe, Xiao, Xiangming, Luo, Yiqi, Caylor, Kelly K., Huang, Yuefei, Wang, Guangqian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28145496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41366
_version_ 1782504003737747456
author Zhou, Sha
Zhang, Yao
Ciais, Philippe
Xiao, Xiangming
Luo, Yiqi
Caylor, Kelly K.
Huang, Yuefei
Wang, Guangqian
author_facet Zhou, Sha
Zhang, Yao
Ciais, Philippe
Xiao, Xiangming
Luo, Yiqi
Caylor, Kelly K.
Huang, Yuefei
Wang, Guangqian
author_sort Zhou, Sha
collection PubMed
description Annual gross primary productivity (GPP) varies considerably due to climate-induced changes in plant phenology and physiology. However, the relative importance of plant phenology and physiology on annual GPP variation is not clear. In this study, a Statistical Model of Integrated Phenology and Physiology (SMIPP) was used to evaluate the relative contributions of maximum daily GPP (GPP(max)) and the start and end of growing season (GS(start) and GS(end)) to annual GPP variability, using a regional GPP product in North America during 2000–2014 and GPP data from 24 AmeriFlux sites. Climatic sensitivity of the three indicators was assessed to investigate the climate impacts on plant phenology and physiology. The SMIPP can explain 98% of inter-annual variability of GPP over mid- and high latitudes in North America. The long-term trend and inter-annual variability of GPP are dominated by GPP(max) both at the ecosystem and regional scales. During warmer spring and autumn, GS(start) is advanced and GS(end) delayed, respectively. GPP(max) responds positively to summer temperature over high latitudes (40–80°N), but negatively in mid-latitudes (25–40°N). This study demonstrates that plant physiology, rather than phenology, plays a dominant role in annual GPP variability, indicating more attention should be paid to physiological change under futher climate change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5286448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52864482017-02-06 Dominant role of plant physiology in trend and variability of gross primary productivity in North America Zhou, Sha Zhang, Yao Ciais, Philippe Xiao, Xiangming Luo, Yiqi Caylor, Kelly K. Huang, Yuefei Wang, Guangqian Sci Rep Article Annual gross primary productivity (GPP) varies considerably due to climate-induced changes in plant phenology and physiology. However, the relative importance of plant phenology and physiology on annual GPP variation is not clear. In this study, a Statistical Model of Integrated Phenology and Physiology (SMIPP) was used to evaluate the relative contributions of maximum daily GPP (GPP(max)) and the start and end of growing season (GS(start) and GS(end)) to annual GPP variability, using a regional GPP product in North America during 2000–2014 and GPP data from 24 AmeriFlux sites. Climatic sensitivity of the three indicators was assessed to investigate the climate impacts on plant phenology and physiology. The SMIPP can explain 98% of inter-annual variability of GPP over mid- and high latitudes in North America. The long-term trend and inter-annual variability of GPP are dominated by GPP(max) both at the ecosystem and regional scales. During warmer spring and autumn, GS(start) is advanced and GS(end) delayed, respectively. GPP(max) responds positively to summer temperature over high latitudes (40–80°N), but negatively in mid-latitudes (25–40°N). This study demonstrates that plant physiology, rather than phenology, plays a dominant role in annual GPP variability, indicating more attention should be paid to physiological change under futher climate change. Nature Publishing Group 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5286448/ /pubmed/28145496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41366 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Zhou, Sha
Zhang, Yao
Ciais, Philippe
Xiao, Xiangming
Luo, Yiqi
Caylor, Kelly K.
Huang, Yuefei
Wang, Guangqian
Dominant role of plant physiology in trend and variability of gross primary productivity in North America
title Dominant role of plant physiology in trend and variability of gross primary productivity in North America
title_full Dominant role of plant physiology in trend and variability of gross primary productivity in North America
title_fullStr Dominant role of plant physiology in trend and variability of gross primary productivity in North America
title_full_unstemmed Dominant role of plant physiology in trend and variability of gross primary productivity in North America
title_short Dominant role of plant physiology in trend and variability of gross primary productivity in North America
title_sort dominant role of plant physiology in trend and variability of gross primary productivity in north america
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28145496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41366
work_keys_str_mv AT zhousha dominantroleofplantphysiologyintrendandvariabilityofgrossprimaryproductivityinnorthamerica
AT zhangyao dominantroleofplantphysiologyintrendandvariabilityofgrossprimaryproductivityinnorthamerica
AT ciaisphilippe dominantroleofplantphysiologyintrendandvariabilityofgrossprimaryproductivityinnorthamerica
AT xiaoxiangming dominantroleofplantphysiologyintrendandvariabilityofgrossprimaryproductivityinnorthamerica
AT luoyiqi dominantroleofplantphysiologyintrendandvariabilityofgrossprimaryproductivityinnorthamerica
AT caylorkellyk dominantroleofplantphysiologyintrendandvariabilityofgrossprimaryproductivityinnorthamerica
AT huangyuefei dominantroleofplantphysiologyintrendandvariabilityofgrossprimaryproductivityinnorthamerica
AT wangguangqian dominantroleofplantphysiologyintrendandvariabilityofgrossprimaryproductivityinnorthamerica