Cargando…

Future Research Priorities for Morbidity Control of Lymphedema

BACKGROUND: Innovation in the treatment of lower extremity lymphedema has received low priority from the governments and pharmaceutical industry. Advancing lymphedema is irreversible and initiates fibrosis in the dermis, reactive changes in the epidermis and subcutis. Most medical treatments offered...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Narahari, S R, Aggithaya, Madhur Guruprasad, Moffatt, Christine, Ryan, T J, Keeley, Vaughan, Vijaya, B, Rajendran, P, Karalam, S B, Rajagopala, S, Kumar, N K, Bose, K S, Sushma, K V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28216723
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.198039
_version_ 1782504056018698240
author Narahari, S R
Aggithaya, Madhur Guruprasad
Moffatt, Christine
Ryan, T J
Keeley, Vaughan
Vijaya, B
Rajendran, P
Karalam, S B
Rajagopala, S
Kumar, N K
Bose, K S
Sushma, K V
author_facet Narahari, S R
Aggithaya, Madhur Guruprasad
Moffatt, Christine
Ryan, T J
Keeley, Vaughan
Vijaya, B
Rajendran, P
Karalam, S B
Rajagopala, S
Kumar, N K
Bose, K S
Sushma, K V
author_sort Narahari, S R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Innovation in the treatment of lower extremity lymphedema has received low priority from the governments and pharmaceutical industry. Advancing lymphedema is irreversible and initiates fibrosis in the dermis, reactive changes in the epidermis and subcutis. Most medical treatments offered for lymphedema are either too demanding with a less than satisfactory response or patients have low concordance due to complex schedules. A priority setting partnership (PSP) was established to decide on the future priorities in lymphedema research. METHODS: A table of abstracts following a literature search was published in workshop website. Stake holders were requested to upload their priorities. Their questions were listed, randomized, and sent to lymphologists for ranking. High ranked ten research priorities, obtained through median score, were presented in final prioritization work shop attended by invited stake holders. A free medical camp was organized during workshop to understand patients’ priorities. RESULTS: One hundred research priorities were selected from priorities uploaded to website. Ten priorities were short listed through a peer review process involving 12 lymphologists, for final discussion. They were related to simplification of integrative treatment for lymphedema, cellular changes in lymphedema and mechanisms of its reversal, eliminating bacterial entry lesions to reduce cellulitis episodes, exploring evidence for therapies in traditional medicine, improving patient concordance to compression therapy, epidemiology of lymphatic filariasis (LF), and economic benefit of integrative treatments of lymphedema. CONCLUSION: A robust research priority setting process, organized as described in James Lind Alliance guidebook, identified seven priority areas to achieve effective morbidity control of lymphedema including LF. All stake holders including Department of Health Research, Government of India, participated in the PSP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5286751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52867512017-02-17 Future Research Priorities for Morbidity Control of Lymphedema Narahari, S R Aggithaya, Madhur Guruprasad Moffatt, Christine Ryan, T J Keeley, Vaughan Vijaya, B Rajendran, P Karalam, S B Rajagopala, S Kumar, N K Bose, K S Sushma, K V Indian J Dermatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Innovation in the treatment of lower extremity lymphedema has received low priority from the governments and pharmaceutical industry. Advancing lymphedema is irreversible and initiates fibrosis in the dermis, reactive changes in the epidermis and subcutis. Most medical treatments offered for lymphedema are either too demanding with a less than satisfactory response or patients have low concordance due to complex schedules. A priority setting partnership (PSP) was established to decide on the future priorities in lymphedema research. METHODS: A table of abstracts following a literature search was published in workshop website. Stake holders were requested to upload their priorities. Their questions were listed, randomized, and sent to lymphologists for ranking. High ranked ten research priorities, obtained through median score, were presented in final prioritization work shop attended by invited stake holders. A free medical camp was organized during workshop to understand patients’ priorities. RESULTS: One hundred research priorities were selected from priorities uploaded to website. Ten priorities were short listed through a peer review process involving 12 lymphologists, for final discussion. They were related to simplification of integrative treatment for lymphedema, cellular changes in lymphedema and mechanisms of its reversal, eliminating bacterial entry lesions to reduce cellulitis episodes, exploring evidence for therapies in traditional medicine, improving patient concordance to compression therapy, epidemiology of lymphatic filariasis (LF), and economic benefit of integrative treatments of lymphedema. CONCLUSION: A robust research priority setting process, organized as described in James Lind Alliance guidebook, identified seven priority areas to achieve effective morbidity control of lymphedema including LF. All stake holders including Department of Health Research, Government of India, participated in the PSP. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5286751/ /pubmed/28216723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.198039 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Narahari, S R
Aggithaya, Madhur Guruprasad
Moffatt, Christine
Ryan, T J
Keeley, Vaughan
Vijaya, B
Rajendran, P
Karalam, S B
Rajagopala, S
Kumar, N K
Bose, K S
Sushma, K V
Future Research Priorities for Morbidity Control of Lymphedema
title Future Research Priorities for Morbidity Control of Lymphedema
title_full Future Research Priorities for Morbidity Control of Lymphedema
title_fullStr Future Research Priorities for Morbidity Control of Lymphedema
title_full_unstemmed Future Research Priorities for Morbidity Control of Lymphedema
title_short Future Research Priorities for Morbidity Control of Lymphedema
title_sort future research priorities for morbidity control of lymphedema
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28216723
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.198039
work_keys_str_mv AT naraharisr futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema
AT aggithayamadhurguruprasad futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema
AT moffattchristine futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema
AT ryantj futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema
AT keeleyvaughan futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema
AT vijayab futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema
AT rajendranp futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema
AT karalamsb futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema
AT rajagopalas futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema
AT kumarnk futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema
AT boseks futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema
AT sushmakv futureresearchprioritiesformorbiditycontroloflymphedema