Cargando…

Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing

Good weighing practice usually dictates that, when using double-substitution weighing to determine the mass difference between two weights, the nominal value of the sensitivity weight used to calibrate the optical scale of the mass comparator be at least four times greater than the difference of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Davis, R. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 1987
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286969/
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.092.020
_version_ 1782504085385117696
author Davis, R. S.
author_facet Davis, R. S.
author_sort Davis, R. S.
collection PubMed
description Good weighing practice usually dictates that, when using double-substitution weighing to determine the mass difference between two weights, the nominal value of the sensitivity weight used to calibrate the optical scale of the mass comparator be at least four times greater than the difference of the two weights being compared. However, there are times when other considerations must override this rule. We examine the theoretical basis for the rule and the penalty for violating it. Finally, we propose a modi-fied weighing scheme which imposes a much less stringent rule for the size of the sensitivity weight. The new scheme requires an additional balance reading, but does not increase the overall measurement time significantly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5286969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1987
publisher [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52869692021-08-02 Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing Davis, R. S. J Res Natl Bur Stand (1977) Article Good weighing practice usually dictates that, when using double-substitution weighing to determine the mass difference between two weights, the nominal value of the sensitivity weight used to calibrate the optical scale of the mass comparator be at least four times greater than the difference of the two weights being compared. However, there are times when other considerations must override this rule. We examine the theoretical basis for the rule and the penalty for violating it. Finally, we propose a modi-fied weighing scheme which imposes a much less stringent rule for the size of the sensitivity weight. The new scheme requires an additional balance reading, but does not increase the overall measurement time significantly. [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 1987 1987-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5286969/ http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.092.020 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ The Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards is a publication of the U.S. Government. The papers are in the public domain and are not subject to copyright in the United States. Articles from J Res may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Article
Davis, R. S.
Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing
title Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing
title_full Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing
title_fullStr Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing
title_full_unstemmed Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing
title_short Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing
title_sort note on the choice of a sensitivity weight in precision weighing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286969/
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.092.020
work_keys_str_mv AT davisrs noteonthechoiceofasensitivityweightinprecisionweighing