Cargando…
Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing
Good weighing practice usually dictates that, when using double-substitution weighing to determine the mass difference between two weights, the nominal value of the sensitivity weight used to calibrate the optical scale of the mass comparator be at least four times greater than the difference of the...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
[Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
1987
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286969/ http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.092.020 |
_version_ | 1782504085385117696 |
---|---|
author | Davis, R. S. |
author_facet | Davis, R. S. |
author_sort | Davis, R. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Good weighing practice usually dictates that, when using double-substitution weighing to determine the mass difference between two weights, the nominal value of the sensitivity weight used to calibrate the optical scale of the mass comparator be at least four times greater than the difference of the two weights being compared. However, there are times when other considerations must override this rule. We examine the theoretical basis for the rule and the penalty for violating it. Finally, we propose a modi-fied weighing scheme which imposes a much less stringent rule for the size of the sensitivity weight. The new scheme requires an additional balance reading, but does not increase the overall measurement time significantly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5286969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1987 |
publisher | [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52869692021-08-02 Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing Davis, R. S. J Res Natl Bur Stand (1977) Article Good weighing practice usually dictates that, when using double-substitution weighing to determine the mass difference between two weights, the nominal value of the sensitivity weight used to calibrate the optical scale of the mass comparator be at least four times greater than the difference of the two weights being compared. However, there are times when other considerations must override this rule. We examine the theoretical basis for the rule and the penalty for violating it. Finally, we propose a modi-fied weighing scheme which imposes a much less stringent rule for the size of the sensitivity weight. The new scheme requires an additional balance reading, but does not increase the overall measurement time significantly. [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 1987 1987-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5286969/ http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.092.020 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ The Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards is a publication of the U.S. Government. The papers are in the public domain and are not subject to copyright in the United States. Articles from J Res may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Article Davis, R. S. Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing |
title | Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing |
title_full | Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing |
title_fullStr | Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing |
title_full_unstemmed | Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing |
title_short | Note on the Choice of a Sensitivity Weight In Precision Weighing |
title_sort | note on the choice of a sensitivity weight in precision weighing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5286969/ http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.092.020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davisrs noteonthechoiceofasensitivityweightinprecisionweighing |