Cargando…
Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy
PURPOSE: To assess changes in oral cavity (OC) shapes and radiation doses to tongue with different tongue positions during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) but who refused or did not tolerate an intraoral device (IOD), such a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27447973 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10621 |
_version_ | 1782504279040327680 |
---|---|
author | Kil, Whoon Jong Kulasekere, Christina Derrwaldt, Ronald Bugno, Jacob Hatch, Craig |
author_facet | Kil, Whoon Jong Kulasekere, Christina Derrwaldt, Ronald Bugno, Jacob Hatch, Craig |
author_sort | Kil, Whoon Jong |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess changes in oral cavity (OC) shapes and radiation doses to tongue with different tongue positions during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) but who refused or did not tolerate an intraoral device (IOD), such as bite block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece. RESULTS: Tongue volume outside of OC was 7.1 ± 3.8 cm(3) (5.4 ± 2.6% of entire OC and 7.8 ± 3.1% of oral tongue) in IMRT-S. D(mean) of OC was 34.9 ± 8.0 Gy and 31.4 ± 8.7 Gy with IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively (p < 0.001). OC volume receiving ≥ 36 Gy (V36) was 40.6 ± 16.9% with IMRT-N and 33.0 ± 17.0% with IMRT-S (p < 0.001). D(mean) of tongue was 38.1 ± 7.9 Gy and 32.8 ± 8.8 Gy in IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively (p < 0.001). V15, V30, and V45 of tongue were significantly lower in IMRT-S (85.3 ± 15.0%, 50.6 ± 16.2%, 24.3 ± 16.0%, respectively) than IMRT-N (94.4 ± 10.6%, 64.7 ± 16.2%, 34.0 ± 18.6%, respectively) (all p < 0.001). Positional offsets of tongue during the course of IMRT-S was –0.1 ± 0.2 cm, 0.01 ± 0.1 cm, and –0.1 ± 0.2 cm (vertical, longitudinal, and lateral, respectively). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 13 patients with HNSCC underwent CT-simulations both with a neutral tongue position and a stick-out tongue for IMRT planning (IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively). Planning objectives were to deliver 70 Gy, 63 Gy, and 56 Gy in 35 fractions to 95% of PTVs. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recommended dose constraints were applied. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared using the student t-test. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT-S for patients with HNSCC who refused or could not tolerate an IOD has significant decreased radiation dose to the tongue than IMRT-N, which may potentially reduce RT related toxicity in tongue in selected patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5288166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52881662017-02-07 Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy Kil, Whoon Jong Kulasekere, Christina Derrwaldt, Ronald Bugno, Jacob Hatch, Craig Oncotarget Research Paper PURPOSE: To assess changes in oral cavity (OC) shapes and radiation doses to tongue with different tongue positions during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) but who refused or did not tolerate an intraoral device (IOD), such as bite block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece. RESULTS: Tongue volume outside of OC was 7.1 ± 3.8 cm(3) (5.4 ± 2.6% of entire OC and 7.8 ± 3.1% of oral tongue) in IMRT-S. D(mean) of OC was 34.9 ± 8.0 Gy and 31.4 ± 8.7 Gy with IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively (p < 0.001). OC volume receiving ≥ 36 Gy (V36) was 40.6 ± 16.9% with IMRT-N and 33.0 ± 17.0% with IMRT-S (p < 0.001). D(mean) of tongue was 38.1 ± 7.9 Gy and 32.8 ± 8.8 Gy in IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively (p < 0.001). V15, V30, and V45 of tongue were significantly lower in IMRT-S (85.3 ± 15.0%, 50.6 ± 16.2%, 24.3 ± 16.0%, respectively) than IMRT-N (94.4 ± 10.6%, 64.7 ± 16.2%, 34.0 ± 18.6%, respectively) (all p < 0.001). Positional offsets of tongue during the course of IMRT-S was –0.1 ± 0.2 cm, 0.01 ± 0.1 cm, and –0.1 ± 0.2 cm (vertical, longitudinal, and lateral, respectively). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 13 patients with HNSCC underwent CT-simulations both with a neutral tongue position and a stick-out tongue for IMRT planning (IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively). Planning objectives were to deliver 70 Gy, 63 Gy, and 56 Gy in 35 fractions to 95% of PTVs. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recommended dose constraints were applied. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared using the student t-test. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT-S for patients with HNSCC who refused or could not tolerate an IOD has significant decreased radiation dose to the tongue than IMRT-N, which may potentially reduce RT related toxicity in tongue in selected patients. Impact Journals LLC 2016-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5288166/ /pubmed/27447973 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10621 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Kil et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Kil, Whoon Jong Kulasekere, Christina Derrwaldt, Ronald Bugno, Jacob Hatch, Craig Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title | Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_full | Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_fullStr | Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_short | Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_sort | decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27447973 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10621 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kilwhoonjong decreasedradiationdosestotonguewithstickouttonguepositionoverneutraltonguepositioninheadandneckcancerpatientswhorefusedorcouldnottolerateanintraoraldevicebiteblocktonguebladeormouthpieceduetotrismusgagreflexordiscomfortduringintensitymodulatedradiationthe AT kulasekerechristina decreasedradiationdosestotonguewithstickouttonguepositionoverneutraltonguepositioninheadandneckcancerpatientswhorefusedorcouldnottolerateanintraoraldevicebiteblocktonguebladeormouthpieceduetotrismusgagreflexordiscomfortduringintensitymodulatedradiationthe AT derrwaldtronald decreasedradiationdosestotonguewithstickouttonguepositionoverneutraltonguepositioninheadandneckcancerpatientswhorefusedorcouldnottolerateanintraoraldevicebiteblocktonguebladeormouthpieceduetotrismusgagreflexordiscomfortduringintensitymodulatedradiationthe AT bugnojacob decreasedradiationdosestotonguewithstickouttonguepositionoverneutraltonguepositioninheadandneckcancerpatientswhorefusedorcouldnottolerateanintraoraldevicebiteblocktonguebladeormouthpieceduetotrismusgagreflexordiscomfortduringintensitymodulatedradiationthe AT hatchcraig decreasedradiationdosestotonguewithstickouttonguepositionoverneutraltonguepositioninheadandneckcancerpatientswhorefusedorcouldnottolerateanintraoraldevicebiteblocktonguebladeormouthpieceduetotrismusgagreflexordiscomfortduringintensitymodulatedradiationthe |