Cargando…

Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy

PURPOSE: To assess changes in oral cavity (OC) shapes and radiation doses to tongue with different tongue positions during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) but who refused or did not tolerate an intraoral device (IOD), such a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kil, Whoon Jong, Kulasekere, Christina, Derrwaldt, Ronald, Bugno, Jacob, Hatch, Craig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27447973
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10621
_version_ 1782504279040327680
author Kil, Whoon Jong
Kulasekere, Christina
Derrwaldt, Ronald
Bugno, Jacob
Hatch, Craig
author_facet Kil, Whoon Jong
Kulasekere, Christina
Derrwaldt, Ronald
Bugno, Jacob
Hatch, Craig
author_sort Kil, Whoon Jong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess changes in oral cavity (OC) shapes and radiation doses to tongue with different tongue positions during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) but who refused or did not tolerate an intraoral device (IOD), such as bite block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece. RESULTS: Tongue volume outside of OC was 7.1 ± 3.8 cm(3) (5.4 ± 2.6% of entire OC and 7.8 ± 3.1% of oral tongue) in IMRT-S. D(mean) of OC was 34.9 ± 8.0 Gy and 31.4 ± 8.7 Gy with IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively (p < 0.001). OC volume receiving ≥ 36 Gy (V36) was 40.6 ± 16.9% with IMRT-N and 33.0 ± 17.0% with IMRT-S (p < 0.001). D(mean) of tongue was 38.1 ± 7.9 Gy and 32.8 ± 8.8 Gy in IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively (p < 0.001). V15, V30, and V45 of tongue were significantly lower in IMRT-S (85.3 ± 15.0%, 50.6 ± 16.2%, 24.3 ± 16.0%, respectively) than IMRT-N (94.4 ± 10.6%, 64.7 ± 16.2%, 34.0 ± 18.6%, respectively) (all p < 0.001). Positional offsets of tongue during the course of IMRT-S was –0.1 ± 0.2 cm, 0.01 ± 0.1 cm, and –0.1 ± 0.2 cm (vertical, longitudinal, and lateral, respectively). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 13 patients with HNSCC underwent CT-simulations both with a neutral tongue position and a stick-out tongue for IMRT planning (IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively). Planning objectives were to deliver 70 Gy, 63 Gy, and 56 Gy in 35 fractions to 95% of PTVs. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recommended dose constraints were applied. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared using the student t-test. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT-S for patients with HNSCC who refused or could not tolerate an IOD has significant decreased radiation dose to the tongue than IMRT-N, which may potentially reduce RT related toxicity in tongue in selected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5288166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52881662017-02-07 Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy Kil, Whoon Jong Kulasekere, Christina Derrwaldt, Ronald Bugno, Jacob Hatch, Craig Oncotarget Research Paper PURPOSE: To assess changes in oral cavity (OC) shapes and radiation doses to tongue with different tongue positions during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) but who refused or did not tolerate an intraoral device (IOD), such as bite block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece. RESULTS: Tongue volume outside of OC was 7.1 ± 3.8 cm(3) (5.4 ± 2.6% of entire OC and 7.8 ± 3.1% of oral tongue) in IMRT-S. D(mean) of OC was 34.9 ± 8.0 Gy and 31.4 ± 8.7 Gy with IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively (p < 0.001). OC volume receiving ≥ 36 Gy (V36) was 40.6 ± 16.9% with IMRT-N and 33.0 ± 17.0% with IMRT-S (p < 0.001). D(mean) of tongue was 38.1 ± 7.9 Gy and 32.8 ± 8.8 Gy in IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively (p < 0.001). V15, V30, and V45 of tongue were significantly lower in IMRT-S (85.3 ± 15.0%, 50.6 ± 16.2%, 24.3 ± 16.0%, respectively) than IMRT-N (94.4 ± 10.6%, 64.7 ± 16.2%, 34.0 ± 18.6%, respectively) (all p < 0.001). Positional offsets of tongue during the course of IMRT-S was –0.1 ± 0.2 cm, 0.01 ± 0.1 cm, and –0.1 ± 0.2 cm (vertical, longitudinal, and lateral, respectively). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 13 patients with HNSCC underwent CT-simulations both with a neutral tongue position and a stick-out tongue for IMRT planning (IMRT-N and IMRT-S, respectively). Planning objectives were to deliver 70 Gy, 63 Gy, and 56 Gy in 35 fractions to 95% of PTVs. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recommended dose constraints were applied. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared using the student t-test. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT-S for patients with HNSCC who refused or could not tolerate an IOD has significant decreased radiation dose to the tongue than IMRT-N, which may potentially reduce RT related toxicity in tongue in selected patients. Impact Journals LLC 2016-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5288166/ /pubmed/27447973 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10621 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Kil et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Kil, Whoon Jong
Kulasekere, Christina
Derrwaldt, Ronald
Bugno, Jacob
Hatch, Craig
Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_fullStr Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_short Decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_sort decreased radiation doses to tongue with “stick-out” tongue position over neutral tongue position in head and neck cancer patients who refused or could not tolerate an intraoral device (bite-block, tongue blade, or mouthpiece) due to trismus, gag reflex, or discomfort during intensity-modulated radiation therapy
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27447973
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10621
work_keys_str_mv AT kilwhoonjong decreasedradiationdosestotonguewithstickouttonguepositionoverneutraltonguepositioninheadandneckcancerpatientswhorefusedorcouldnottolerateanintraoraldevicebiteblocktonguebladeormouthpieceduetotrismusgagreflexordiscomfortduringintensitymodulatedradiationthe
AT kulasekerechristina decreasedradiationdosestotonguewithstickouttonguepositionoverneutraltonguepositioninheadandneckcancerpatientswhorefusedorcouldnottolerateanintraoraldevicebiteblocktonguebladeormouthpieceduetotrismusgagreflexordiscomfortduringintensitymodulatedradiationthe
AT derrwaldtronald decreasedradiationdosestotonguewithstickouttonguepositionoverneutraltonguepositioninheadandneckcancerpatientswhorefusedorcouldnottolerateanintraoraldevicebiteblocktonguebladeormouthpieceduetotrismusgagreflexordiscomfortduringintensitymodulatedradiationthe
AT bugnojacob decreasedradiationdosestotonguewithstickouttonguepositionoverneutraltonguepositioninheadandneckcancerpatientswhorefusedorcouldnottolerateanintraoraldevicebiteblocktonguebladeormouthpieceduetotrismusgagreflexordiscomfortduringintensitymodulatedradiationthe
AT hatchcraig decreasedradiationdosestotonguewithstickouttonguepositionoverneutraltonguepositioninheadandneckcancerpatientswhorefusedorcouldnottolerateanintraoraldevicebiteblocktonguebladeormouthpieceduetotrismusgagreflexordiscomfortduringintensitymodulatedradiationthe