Cargando…

Evaluating the responses of forest ecosystems to climate change and CO(2) using dynamic global vegetation models

The climate has important influences on the distribution and structure of forest ecosystems, which may lead to vital feedback to climate change. However, much of the existing work focuses on the changes in carbon fluxes or water cycles due to climate change and/or atmospheric CO (2), and few studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Xiang, Zeng, Xiaodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28168035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2735
Descripción
Sumario:The climate has important influences on the distribution and structure of forest ecosystems, which may lead to vital feedback to climate change. However, much of the existing work focuses on the changes in carbon fluxes or water cycles due to climate change and/or atmospheric CO (2), and few studies have considered how and to what extent climate change and CO (2) influence the ecosystem structure (e.g., fractional coverage change) and the changes in the responses of ecosystems with different characteristics. In this work, two dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs): IAP‐DGVM coupled with CLM3 and CLM4‐CNDV, were used to investigate the response of the forest ecosystem structure to changes in climate (temperature and precipitation) and CO (2) concentration. In the temperature sensitivity tests, warming reduced the global area‐averaged ecosystem gross primary production in the two models, which decreased global forest area. Furthermore, the changes in tree fractional coverage (ΔF (tree); %) from the two models were sensitive to the regional temperature and ecosystem structure, i.e., the mean annual temperature (MAT; °C) largely determined whether ΔF (tree) was positive or negative, while the tree fractional coverage (F (tree); %) played a decisive role in the amplitude of ΔF (tree) around the globe, and the dependence was more remarkable in IAP‐DGVM. In cases with precipitation change, F (tree) had a uniformly positive relationship with precipitation, especially in the transition zones of forests (30% < F (tree) < 60%) for IAP‐DGVM and in semiarid and arid regions for CLM4‐CNDV. Moreover, ΔF (tree) had a stronger dependence on F (tree) than on the mean annual precipitation (MAP; mm/year). It was also demonstrated that both models captured the fertilization effects of the CO (2) concentration.