Cargando…

Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway

PURPOSE: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 is a generic instrument to assess disability covering six domains. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of the instrument for monitoring disability in specialized somatic rehabilitation by testin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moen, Vegard Pihl, Drageset, Jorunn, Eide, Geir Egil, Klokkerud, Mari, Gjesdal, Sturla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27506525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1384-5
_version_ 1782504325906432000
author Moen, Vegard Pihl
Drageset, Jorunn
Eide, Geir Egil
Klokkerud, Mari
Gjesdal, Sturla
author_facet Moen, Vegard Pihl
Drageset, Jorunn
Eide, Geir Egil
Klokkerud, Mari
Gjesdal, Sturla
author_sort Moen, Vegard Pihl
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 is a generic instrument to assess disability covering six domains. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of the instrument for monitoring disability in specialized somatic rehabilitation by testing reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of WHODAS 2.0, Norwegian version, among patients with various health conditions. METHODS: For taxonomy, terminology and definitions, the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments were followed. Reproducibility was investigated by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) in a randomly selected sample. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity was evaluated by correlations between WHODAS 2.0 and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form, and fit of the hypothesized structure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Responsiveness was evaluated in another randomly selected sample by testing a priori formulated hypotheses. RESULTS: Nine hundred seventy patients were included in the study. Reproducibility and responsiveness were evaluated in 53 and 104 patients, respectively. The ICC for the WHODAS 2.0 domains ranged from 0.63 to 0.84 and was 0.87 for total score. Cronbach’s alpha for domains ranged from 0.75 to 0.94 and was 0.93 for total score. For construct validity, 6 of 12 expected correlations were confirmed and CFA did not achieve satisfactory fit indices. For responsiveness, 3 of 8 hypotheses were confirmed. CONCLUSION: The Norwegian version of WHODAS 2.0 showed moderate to satisfactory reliability and moderate validity in rehabilitation patients. However, the present study indicated possible limitations in terms of responsiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5288428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52884282017-02-16 Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway Moen, Vegard Pihl Drageset, Jorunn Eide, Geir Egil Klokkerud, Mari Gjesdal, Sturla Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 is a generic instrument to assess disability covering six domains. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of the instrument for monitoring disability in specialized somatic rehabilitation by testing reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of WHODAS 2.0, Norwegian version, among patients with various health conditions. METHODS: For taxonomy, terminology and definitions, the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments were followed. Reproducibility was investigated by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) in a randomly selected sample. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity was evaluated by correlations between WHODAS 2.0 and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form, and fit of the hypothesized structure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Responsiveness was evaluated in another randomly selected sample by testing a priori formulated hypotheses. RESULTS: Nine hundred seventy patients were included in the study. Reproducibility and responsiveness were evaluated in 53 and 104 patients, respectively. The ICC for the WHODAS 2.0 domains ranged from 0.63 to 0.84 and was 0.87 for total score. Cronbach’s alpha for domains ranged from 0.75 to 0.94 and was 0.93 for total score. For construct validity, 6 of 12 expected correlations were confirmed and CFA did not achieve satisfactory fit indices. For responsiveness, 3 of 8 hypotheses were confirmed. CONCLUSION: The Norwegian version of WHODAS 2.0 showed moderate to satisfactory reliability and moderate validity in rehabilitation patients. However, the present study indicated possible limitations in terms of responsiveness. Springer International Publishing 2016-08-09 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5288428/ /pubmed/27506525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1384-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Moen, Vegard Pihl
Drageset, Jorunn
Eide, Geir Egil
Klokkerud, Mari
Gjesdal, Sturla
Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway
title Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway
title_full Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway
title_fullStr Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway
title_short Validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway
title_sort validation of world health organization assessment schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in norway
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27506525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1384-5
work_keys_str_mv AT moenvegardpihl validationofworldhealthorganizationassessmentschedule20inspecializedsomaticrehabilitationservicesinnorway
AT dragesetjorunn validationofworldhealthorganizationassessmentschedule20inspecializedsomaticrehabilitationservicesinnorway
AT eidegeiregil validationofworldhealthorganizationassessmentschedule20inspecializedsomaticrehabilitationservicesinnorway
AT klokkerudmari validationofworldhealthorganizationassessmentschedule20inspecializedsomaticrehabilitationservicesinnorway
AT gjesdalsturla validationofworldhealthorganizationassessmentschedule20inspecializedsomaticrehabilitationservicesinnorway