Cargando…

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue by local adipocyte injury but rather by modulation of systemic lipid metabolism

Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) has been applied recently to body contouring. However the mechanism of LLLT-induced reduction of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness has not been elucidated and proposed hypotheses are highly controversial. Non-obese volunteers were subject to 650nm LLLT ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jankowski, Marek, Gawrych, Mariusz, Adamska, Urszula, Ciescinski, Jakub, Serafin, Zbigniew, Czajkowski, Rafal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27384041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-2021-9
_version_ 1782504327878803456
author Jankowski, Marek
Gawrych, Mariusz
Adamska, Urszula
Ciescinski, Jakub
Serafin, Zbigniew
Czajkowski, Rafal
author_facet Jankowski, Marek
Gawrych, Mariusz
Adamska, Urszula
Ciescinski, Jakub
Serafin, Zbigniew
Czajkowski, Rafal
author_sort Jankowski, Marek
collection PubMed
description Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) has been applied recently to body contouring. However the mechanism of LLLT-induced reduction of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness has not been elucidated and proposed hypotheses are highly controversial. Non-obese volunteers were subject to 650nm LLLT therapy. Each patient received 6 treatments 2-3 days apart to one side of the abdomen. The contralateral side was left untreated and served as control. Subjects’ abdominal adipose tissue thickness was measured by ultrasound imaging at baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment. Our study is to the best of our knowledge, the largest split-abdomen study employing subcutaneous abdominal fat imaging. We could not show a statistically significant reduction of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue by LLLT therapy. Paradoxically when the measurements of the loss of fat thickness on treated side was corrected for change in thickness on non treated side, we have observed that in 8 out of 17 patients LLLT increased adipose tissue thickness. In two patients severe side effect occurred as a result of treatment: one patient developed ulceration within appendectomy scar, the other over the posterior superior iliac spine. The paradoxical net increase in subcutaneous fat thickness observed in some of our patients is a rationale against liquefactive and transitory pore models of LLLT-induced adipose tissue reduction. LLLT devices with laser diode panels applied directly on the skin are not as safe as devices with treatment panels separated from the patient’s skin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5288437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52884372017-02-16 Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue by local adipocyte injury but rather by modulation of systemic lipid metabolism Jankowski, Marek Gawrych, Mariusz Adamska, Urszula Ciescinski, Jakub Serafin, Zbigniew Czajkowski, Rafal Lasers Med Sci Brief Report Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) has been applied recently to body contouring. However the mechanism of LLLT-induced reduction of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness has not been elucidated and proposed hypotheses are highly controversial. Non-obese volunteers were subject to 650nm LLLT therapy. Each patient received 6 treatments 2-3 days apart to one side of the abdomen. The contralateral side was left untreated and served as control. Subjects’ abdominal adipose tissue thickness was measured by ultrasound imaging at baseline and 2 weeks post-treatment. Our study is to the best of our knowledge, the largest split-abdomen study employing subcutaneous abdominal fat imaging. We could not show a statistically significant reduction of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue by LLLT therapy. Paradoxically when the measurements of the loss of fat thickness on treated side was corrected for change in thickness on non treated side, we have observed that in 8 out of 17 patients LLLT increased adipose tissue thickness. In two patients severe side effect occurred as a result of treatment: one patient developed ulceration within appendectomy scar, the other over the posterior superior iliac spine. The paradoxical net increase in subcutaneous fat thickness observed in some of our patients is a rationale against liquefactive and transitory pore models of LLLT-induced adipose tissue reduction. LLLT devices with laser diode panels applied directly on the skin are not as safe as devices with treatment panels separated from the patient’s skin. Springer London 2016-07-06 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5288437/ /pubmed/27384041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-2021-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Jankowski, Marek
Gawrych, Mariusz
Adamska, Urszula
Ciescinski, Jakub
Serafin, Zbigniew
Czajkowski, Rafal
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue by local adipocyte injury but rather by modulation of systemic lipid metabolism
title Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue by local adipocyte injury but rather by modulation of systemic lipid metabolism
title_full Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue by local adipocyte injury but rather by modulation of systemic lipid metabolism
title_fullStr Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue by local adipocyte injury but rather by modulation of systemic lipid metabolism
title_full_unstemmed Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue by local adipocyte injury but rather by modulation of systemic lipid metabolism
title_short Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue by local adipocyte injury but rather by modulation of systemic lipid metabolism
title_sort low-level laser therapy (lllt) does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue by local adipocyte injury but rather by modulation of systemic lipid metabolism
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27384041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-2021-9
work_keys_str_mv AT jankowskimarek lowlevellasertherapyllltdoesnotreducesubcutaneousadiposetissuebylocaladipocyteinjurybutratherbymodulationofsystemiclipidmetabolism
AT gawrychmariusz lowlevellasertherapyllltdoesnotreducesubcutaneousadiposetissuebylocaladipocyteinjurybutratherbymodulationofsystemiclipidmetabolism
AT adamskaurszula lowlevellasertherapyllltdoesnotreducesubcutaneousadiposetissuebylocaladipocyteinjurybutratherbymodulationofsystemiclipidmetabolism
AT ciescinskijakub lowlevellasertherapyllltdoesnotreducesubcutaneousadiposetissuebylocaladipocyteinjurybutratherbymodulationofsystemiclipidmetabolism
AT serafinzbigniew lowlevellasertherapyllltdoesnotreducesubcutaneousadiposetissuebylocaladipocyteinjurybutratherbymodulationofsystemiclipidmetabolism
AT czajkowskirafal lowlevellasertherapyllltdoesnotreducesubcutaneousadiposetissuebylocaladipocyteinjurybutratherbymodulationofsystemiclipidmetabolism