Cargando…

A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section

An anaphylactic reaction during a cesarean section occurs rarely, and rocuronium is thought to be one of the common agents causing perioperative anaphylaxis. Here we report an anaphylactic shock after cesarean section that is suggested to be induced by the rocuronium–sugammadex complex. A 36-year-ol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamaoka, Masakazu, Deguchi, Miki, Ninomiya, Kiichiro, Kurasako, Toshiaki, Matsumoto, Mutsuko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2280-4
_version_ 1782504328527872000
author Yamaoka, Masakazu
Deguchi, Miki
Ninomiya, Kiichiro
Kurasako, Toshiaki
Matsumoto, Mutsuko
author_facet Yamaoka, Masakazu
Deguchi, Miki
Ninomiya, Kiichiro
Kurasako, Toshiaki
Matsumoto, Mutsuko
author_sort Yamaoka, Masakazu
collection PubMed
description An anaphylactic reaction during a cesarean section occurs rarely, and rocuronium is thought to be one of the common agents causing perioperative anaphylaxis. Here we report an anaphylactic shock after cesarean section that is suggested to be induced by the rocuronium–sugammadex complex. A 36-year-old primigravida underwent an elective cesarean section under general anesthesia due to placenta previa. While the operation was completed uneventfully, she developed anaphylactic shock following sugammadex administration. She was successfully managed with rapid treatments. Serum tryptase level was significantly elevated. Although sugammadex was first suspected to be the causative agent, the result of intradermal skin tests with sugammadex were negative. Surprisingly, a subsequent intradermal test with undiluted rocuronium caused the patient to fall into a state of shock. Furthermore, a later skin-prick test with pre-mixed rocuronium–sugammadex complex also revealed a strong positive reaction, and a test with only rocuronium showed negative. We finally concluded that the rocuronium–sugammadex complex is the causative agent in this case. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting anaphylaxis caused by the rocuronium–sugammadex complex. This case highlights the importance of appropriate examinations to determinate the pathogenesis of anaphylaxis in order to establish risk reduction strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5288440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52884402017-02-16 A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section Yamaoka, Masakazu Deguchi, Miki Ninomiya, Kiichiro Kurasako, Toshiaki Matsumoto, Mutsuko J Anesth Clinical Report An anaphylactic reaction during a cesarean section occurs rarely, and rocuronium is thought to be one of the common agents causing perioperative anaphylaxis. Here we report an anaphylactic shock after cesarean section that is suggested to be induced by the rocuronium–sugammadex complex. A 36-year-old primigravida underwent an elective cesarean section under general anesthesia due to placenta previa. While the operation was completed uneventfully, she developed anaphylactic shock following sugammadex administration. She was successfully managed with rapid treatments. Serum tryptase level was significantly elevated. Although sugammadex was first suspected to be the causative agent, the result of intradermal skin tests with sugammadex were negative. Surprisingly, a subsequent intradermal test with undiluted rocuronium caused the patient to fall into a state of shock. Furthermore, a later skin-prick test with pre-mixed rocuronium–sugammadex complex also revealed a strong positive reaction, and a test with only rocuronium showed negative. We finally concluded that the rocuronium–sugammadex complex is the causative agent in this case. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting anaphylaxis caused by the rocuronium–sugammadex complex. This case highlights the importance of appropriate examinations to determinate the pathogenesis of anaphylaxis in order to establish risk reduction strategies. Springer Japan 2016-11-16 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5288440/ /pubmed/27853881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2280-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Clinical Report
Yamaoka, Masakazu
Deguchi, Miki
Ninomiya, Kiichiro
Kurasako, Toshiaki
Matsumoto, Mutsuko
A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section
title A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section
title_full A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section
title_fullStr A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section
title_short A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section
title_sort suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section
topic Clinical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2280-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yamaokamasakazu asuspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection
AT deguchimiki asuspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection
AT ninomiyakiichiro asuspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection
AT kurasakotoshiaki asuspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection
AT matsumotomutsuko asuspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection
AT yamaokamasakazu suspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection
AT deguchimiki suspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection
AT ninomiyakiichiro suspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection
AT kurasakotoshiaki suspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection
AT matsumotomutsuko suspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection