Cargando…
A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section
An anaphylactic reaction during a cesarean section occurs rarely, and rocuronium is thought to be one of the common agents causing perioperative anaphylaxis. Here we report an anaphylactic shock after cesarean section that is suggested to be induced by the rocuronium–sugammadex complex. A 36-year-ol...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Japan
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2280-4 |
_version_ | 1782504328527872000 |
---|---|
author | Yamaoka, Masakazu Deguchi, Miki Ninomiya, Kiichiro Kurasako, Toshiaki Matsumoto, Mutsuko |
author_facet | Yamaoka, Masakazu Deguchi, Miki Ninomiya, Kiichiro Kurasako, Toshiaki Matsumoto, Mutsuko |
author_sort | Yamaoka, Masakazu |
collection | PubMed |
description | An anaphylactic reaction during a cesarean section occurs rarely, and rocuronium is thought to be one of the common agents causing perioperative anaphylaxis. Here we report an anaphylactic shock after cesarean section that is suggested to be induced by the rocuronium–sugammadex complex. A 36-year-old primigravida underwent an elective cesarean section under general anesthesia due to placenta previa. While the operation was completed uneventfully, she developed anaphylactic shock following sugammadex administration. She was successfully managed with rapid treatments. Serum tryptase level was significantly elevated. Although sugammadex was first suspected to be the causative agent, the result of intradermal skin tests with sugammadex were negative. Surprisingly, a subsequent intradermal test with undiluted rocuronium caused the patient to fall into a state of shock. Furthermore, a later skin-prick test with pre-mixed rocuronium–sugammadex complex also revealed a strong positive reaction, and a test with only rocuronium showed negative. We finally concluded that the rocuronium–sugammadex complex is the causative agent in this case. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting anaphylaxis caused by the rocuronium–sugammadex complex. This case highlights the importance of appropriate examinations to determinate the pathogenesis of anaphylaxis in order to establish risk reduction strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5288440 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Japan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52884402017-02-16 A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section Yamaoka, Masakazu Deguchi, Miki Ninomiya, Kiichiro Kurasako, Toshiaki Matsumoto, Mutsuko J Anesth Clinical Report An anaphylactic reaction during a cesarean section occurs rarely, and rocuronium is thought to be one of the common agents causing perioperative anaphylaxis. Here we report an anaphylactic shock after cesarean section that is suggested to be induced by the rocuronium–sugammadex complex. A 36-year-old primigravida underwent an elective cesarean section under general anesthesia due to placenta previa. While the operation was completed uneventfully, she developed anaphylactic shock following sugammadex administration. She was successfully managed with rapid treatments. Serum tryptase level was significantly elevated. Although sugammadex was first suspected to be the causative agent, the result of intradermal skin tests with sugammadex were negative. Surprisingly, a subsequent intradermal test with undiluted rocuronium caused the patient to fall into a state of shock. Furthermore, a later skin-prick test with pre-mixed rocuronium–sugammadex complex also revealed a strong positive reaction, and a test with only rocuronium showed negative. We finally concluded that the rocuronium–sugammadex complex is the causative agent in this case. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting anaphylaxis caused by the rocuronium–sugammadex complex. This case highlights the importance of appropriate examinations to determinate the pathogenesis of anaphylaxis in order to establish risk reduction strategies. Springer Japan 2016-11-16 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5288440/ /pubmed/27853881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2280-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Report Yamaoka, Masakazu Deguchi, Miki Ninomiya, Kiichiro Kurasako, Toshiaki Matsumoto, Mutsuko A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section |
title | A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section |
title_full | A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section |
title_fullStr | A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section |
title_full_unstemmed | A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section |
title_short | A suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section |
title_sort | suspected case of rocuronium–sugammadex complex-induced anaphylactic shock after cesarean section |
topic | Clinical Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2280-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamaokamasakazu asuspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection AT deguchimiki asuspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection AT ninomiyakiichiro asuspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection AT kurasakotoshiaki asuspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection AT matsumotomutsuko asuspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection AT yamaokamasakazu suspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection AT deguchimiki suspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection AT ninomiyakiichiro suspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection AT kurasakotoshiaki suspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection AT matsumotomutsuko suspectedcaseofrocuroniumsugammadexcomplexinducedanaphylacticshockaftercesareansection |