Cargando…

Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore

BACKGROUND: A cross-sectional study to ascertain what the Singapore population would regard as material risk in the anaesthesia consent-taking process and identify demographic factors that predict patient preferences in medical decision-making to tailor a more patient-centered informed consent. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yek, J.L.J., Lee, A.K.Y., Tan, J.A.D., Lin, G.Y., Thamotharampillai, T., Abdullah, H.R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28148256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0172-2
_version_ 1782504402229133312
author Yek, J.L.J.
Lee, A.K.Y.
Tan, J.A.D.
Lin, G.Y.
Thamotharampillai, T.
Abdullah, H.R.
author_facet Yek, J.L.J.
Lee, A.K.Y.
Tan, J.A.D.
Lin, G.Y.
Thamotharampillai, T.
Abdullah, H.R.
author_sort Yek, J.L.J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A cross-sectional study to ascertain what the Singapore population would regard as material risk in the anaesthesia consent-taking process and identify demographic factors that predict patient preferences in medical decision-making to tailor a more patient-centered informed consent. METHODS: A survey was performed involving patients 21 years old and above who attended the pre-operative evaluation clinic over a 1-month period in Singapore General Hospital. Questionnaires were administered to assess patients’ perception of material risks, by trained interviewers. Patients’ demographics were obtained. Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance was used. Statistical significance was taken at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Four hundred fourteen patients were eligible of which 26 refused to participate and 24 were excluded due to language barrier. 364 patients were recruited. A higher level of education (p < 0.007), being employed (p < 0.046) and younger age group (p < 0.003) are factors identified in patients who wanted greater participation in medical decisions. Gender, marital status, type of surgery, and previous surgical history did not affect their level of participation. The complications most patients knew about were Nausea (64.8%), Drowsiness (62.4%) and Surgical Wound Pain (58.8%). Patients ranked Heart Attack (59.3%), Death (53.8%) and Stroke (52.7%) as the most significant risks that they wanted to be informed about in greater detail. Most patients wanted to make a joint decision with the anaesthetist (52.2%), instead of letting the doctor decide (37.1%) or deciding for themselves (10.7%). Discussion with the anaesthetist (61.3%) is the preferred medium of communication compared to reading a pamphlet (23.4%) or watching a video (15.4%). CONCLUSION: Age and educational level can influence medical decision-making. Despite the digital age, most patients still prefer a clinic consult instead of audio-visual multimedia for pre-operative anaesthetic counselling. The local population appears to place greater importance on rare but serious complications compared to common complications. This illustrates the need to contextualize information provided during informed consent to strengthen the doctor-patient relationship. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0172-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5288849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52888492017-02-06 Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore Yek, J.L.J. Lee, A.K.Y. Tan, J.A.D. Lin, G.Y. Thamotharampillai, T. Abdullah, H.R. BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: A cross-sectional study to ascertain what the Singapore population would regard as material risk in the anaesthesia consent-taking process and identify demographic factors that predict patient preferences in medical decision-making to tailor a more patient-centered informed consent. METHODS: A survey was performed involving patients 21 years old and above who attended the pre-operative evaluation clinic over a 1-month period in Singapore General Hospital. Questionnaires were administered to assess patients’ perception of material risks, by trained interviewers. Patients’ demographics were obtained. Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance was used. Statistical significance was taken at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Four hundred fourteen patients were eligible of which 26 refused to participate and 24 were excluded due to language barrier. 364 patients were recruited. A higher level of education (p < 0.007), being employed (p < 0.046) and younger age group (p < 0.003) are factors identified in patients who wanted greater participation in medical decisions. Gender, marital status, type of surgery, and previous surgical history did not affect their level of participation. The complications most patients knew about were Nausea (64.8%), Drowsiness (62.4%) and Surgical Wound Pain (58.8%). Patients ranked Heart Attack (59.3%), Death (53.8%) and Stroke (52.7%) as the most significant risks that they wanted to be informed about in greater detail. Most patients wanted to make a joint decision with the anaesthetist (52.2%), instead of letting the doctor decide (37.1%) or deciding for themselves (10.7%). Discussion with the anaesthetist (61.3%) is the preferred medium of communication compared to reading a pamphlet (23.4%) or watching a video (15.4%). CONCLUSION: Age and educational level can influence medical decision-making. Despite the digital age, most patients still prefer a clinic consult instead of audio-visual multimedia for pre-operative anaesthetic counselling. The local population appears to place greater importance on rare but serious complications compared to common complications. This illustrates the need to contextualize information provided during informed consent to strengthen the doctor-patient relationship. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0172-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5288849/ /pubmed/28148256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0172-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yek, J.L.J.
Lee, A.K.Y.
Tan, J.A.D.
Lin, G.Y.
Thamotharampillai, T.
Abdullah, H.R.
Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore
title Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore
title_full Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore
title_fullStr Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore
title_full_unstemmed Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore
title_short Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore
title_sort defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in singapore
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28148256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0172-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yekjlj definingreasonablepatientstandardandpreferenceforshareddecisionmakingamongpatientsundergoinganaesthesiainsingapore
AT leeaky definingreasonablepatientstandardandpreferenceforshareddecisionmakingamongpatientsundergoinganaesthesiainsingapore
AT tanjad definingreasonablepatientstandardandpreferenceforshareddecisionmakingamongpatientsundergoinganaesthesiainsingapore
AT lingy definingreasonablepatientstandardandpreferenceforshareddecisionmakingamongpatientsundergoinganaesthesiainsingapore
AT thamotharampillait definingreasonablepatientstandardandpreferenceforshareddecisionmakingamongpatientsundergoinganaesthesiainsingapore
AT abdullahhr definingreasonablepatientstandardandpreferenceforshareddecisionmakingamongpatientsundergoinganaesthesiainsingapore