Cargando…

Job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-RTW cohort study

BACKGROUND: In order to help workers with long-term sickness absence return to work (RTW), it is important to understand factors that either impede or facilitate employee’s reintegration into the labour force. The aim of this study was therefore to examine the impact of psychological work characteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haveraaen, Lise Aasen, Skarpaas, Lisebet Skeie, Aas, Randi Wågø
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28152995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3942-8
_version_ 1782504406955065344
author Haveraaen, Lise Aasen
Skarpaas, Lisebet Skeie
Aas, Randi Wågø
author_facet Haveraaen, Lise Aasen
Skarpaas, Lisebet Skeie
Aas, Randi Wågø
author_sort Haveraaen, Lise Aasen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In order to help workers with long-term sickness absence return to work (RTW), it is important to understand factors that either impede or facilitate employee’s reintegration into the labour force. The aim of this study was therefore to examine the impact of psychological work characteristics on time-to first RTW in sick listed employees in Norway. METHODS: The study was designed as a cohort study of 543 employees participating in 50 different RTW programmes. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) was used to gather information on the psychological work conditions. The participants were followed for up to 18 months after they started treatment in the RTW programme. Survival analyses were used to investigate the association between psychological work conditions and time-to first RTW. RESULTS: Having high psychological job demands (HR = .654; 95% CI: .513–.832) and low decision control (HR = 1.297; 95% CI: 1.010–1.666) were both independent predictors of delayed RTW. Employees in low-strain jobs (low demands/high control) (HR = 1.811; 95% CI: 1.287–2.549) and passive jobs (low demands/low control) (HR = 1.599; 95% CI: 1.107–2.309), returned to work earlier compared to employees in high-strain jobs (high demands/low control). No difference was found for active jobs (high demands/high control). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that high psychological demands, low control, and being in a high strain job reduced the probability of early RTW in sick listed employees. RTW programmes should therefore increase the focus on these issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5288870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52888702017-02-06 Job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-RTW cohort study Haveraaen, Lise Aasen Skarpaas, Lisebet Skeie Aas, Randi Wågø BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In order to help workers with long-term sickness absence return to work (RTW), it is important to understand factors that either impede or facilitate employee’s reintegration into the labour force. The aim of this study was therefore to examine the impact of psychological work characteristics on time-to first RTW in sick listed employees in Norway. METHODS: The study was designed as a cohort study of 543 employees participating in 50 different RTW programmes. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) was used to gather information on the psychological work conditions. The participants were followed for up to 18 months after they started treatment in the RTW programme. Survival analyses were used to investigate the association between psychological work conditions and time-to first RTW. RESULTS: Having high psychological job demands (HR = .654; 95% CI: .513–.832) and low decision control (HR = 1.297; 95% CI: 1.010–1.666) were both independent predictors of delayed RTW. Employees in low-strain jobs (low demands/high control) (HR = 1.811; 95% CI: 1.287–2.549) and passive jobs (low demands/low control) (HR = 1.599; 95% CI: 1.107–2.309), returned to work earlier compared to employees in high-strain jobs (high demands/low control). No difference was found for active jobs (high demands/high control). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that high psychological demands, low control, and being in a high strain job reduced the probability of early RTW in sick listed employees. RTW programmes should therefore increase the focus on these issues. BioMed Central 2017-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5288870/ /pubmed/28152995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3942-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haveraaen, Lise Aasen
Skarpaas, Lisebet Skeie
Aas, Randi Wågø
Job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-RTW cohort study
title Job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-RTW cohort study
title_full Job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-RTW cohort study
title_fullStr Job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-RTW cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-RTW cohort study
title_short Job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-RTW cohort study
title_sort job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-rtw cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5288870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28152995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3942-8
work_keys_str_mv AT haveraaenliseaasen jobdemandsanddecisioncontrolpredictedreturntoworktherapidrtwcohortstudy
AT skarpaaslisebetskeie jobdemandsanddecisioncontrolpredictedreturntoworktherapidrtwcohortstudy
AT aasrandiwagø jobdemandsanddecisioncontrolpredictedreturntoworktherapidrtwcohortstudy