Cargando…
The prognostic value of tumor length to resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study
BACKGROUND: The current TNM classification system does not consider tumor length for patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC). This study explored the effect of tumor length, in addition to tumor depth and lymph node involvement, on survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28168111 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2943 |
_version_ | 1782504455265058816 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xiangwei Wang, Yang Li, Cheng Helmersson, Jing Jiang, Yuanzhu Ma, Guoyuan Wang, Guanghui Dong, Wei Sang, Shaowei Du, Jiajun |
author_facet | Zhang, Xiangwei Wang, Yang Li, Cheng Helmersson, Jing Jiang, Yuanzhu Ma, Guoyuan Wang, Guanghui Dong, Wei Sang, Shaowei Du, Jiajun |
author_sort | Zhang, Xiangwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The current TNM classification system does not consider tumor length for patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC). This study explored the effect of tumor length, in addition to tumor depth and lymph node involvement, on survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: A total of 498 ESCC patients who underwent surgical resection as the primary treatment were selected in the retrospective study. Pathological details were collected, which included tumor type, TNM stage, differentiation. Other collected information were: the types of esophageal resection, ABO blood group, family history and demographic and lifestyle factors. A time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a regression tree for survival were used to identify the cut-off point of tumor length, which was 3 cm. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify the prognostic factors to ESCC. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates were found to be 82.5%, 55.6%, and 35.1%, respectively. Patients who had larger tumor length (>3 cm) had a higher risk for death than the rest patients. From the univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, the overall survival rate was significantly influenced by the depth of the tumor and lymph node involvement (either as dummy or continuous variables), Sex, and tumor length. Using these four variables in the multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model, we found that the overall survival was significantly influenced by all variables except Sex. Therefore, in addition to the depth of the tumor and lymph node involvement (as either dummy or continuous variables), the tumor length is also an independent prognostic factor for ESCC. The overall survival rate was higher in a group with smaller tumor length (≤3 cm) than those patients with larger tumor length (>3 cm), no matter what the tumor stage was. CONCLUSION: The tumor length was found to be an important prognostic factor for ESCC patients without receiving neoadjuvant therapy. The modification of EC staging system may consider tumor length to better predict ESCC survival and identify higher risk patients for postoperative therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5289103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52891032017-02-06 The prognostic value of tumor length to resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study Zhang, Xiangwei Wang, Yang Li, Cheng Helmersson, Jing Jiang, Yuanzhu Ma, Guoyuan Wang, Guanghui Dong, Wei Sang, Shaowei Du, Jiajun PeerJ Oncology BACKGROUND: The current TNM classification system does not consider tumor length for patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC). This study explored the effect of tumor length, in addition to tumor depth and lymph node involvement, on survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: A total of 498 ESCC patients who underwent surgical resection as the primary treatment were selected in the retrospective study. Pathological details were collected, which included tumor type, TNM stage, differentiation. Other collected information were: the types of esophageal resection, ABO blood group, family history and demographic and lifestyle factors. A time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a regression tree for survival were used to identify the cut-off point of tumor length, which was 3 cm. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify the prognostic factors to ESCC. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates were found to be 82.5%, 55.6%, and 35.1%, respectively. Patients who had larger tumor length (>3 cm) had a higher risk for death than the rest patients. From the univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, the overall survival rate was significantly influenced by the depth of the tumor and lymph node involvement (either as dummy or continuous variables), Sex, and tumor length. Using these four variables in the multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model, we found that the overall survival was significantly influenced by all variables except Sex. Therefore, in addition to the depth of the tumor and lymph node involvement (as either dummy or continuous variables), the tumor length is also an independent prognostic factor for ESCC. The overall survival rate was higher in a group with smaller tumor length (≤3 cm) than those patients with larger tumor length (>3 cm), no matter what the tumor stage was. CONCLUSION: The tumor length was found to be an important prognostic factor for ESCC patients without receiving neoadjuvant therapy. The modification of EC staging system may consider tumor length to better predict ESCC survival and identify higher risk patients for postoperative therapy. PeerJ Inc. 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5289103/ /pubmed/28168111 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2943 Text en ©2017 Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Zhang, Xiangwei Wang, Yang Li, Cheng Helmersson, Jing Jiang, Yuanzhu Ma, Guoyuan Wang, Guanghui Dong, Wei Sang, Shaowei Du, Jiajun The prognostic value of tumor length to resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study |
title | The prognostic value of tumor length to resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study |
title_full | The prognostic value of tumor length to resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | The prognostic value of tumor length to resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic value of tumor length to resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study |
title_short | The prognostic value of tumor length to resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study |
title_sort | prognostic value of tumor length to resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28168111 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2943 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxiangwei theprognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT wangyang theprognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT licheng theprognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT helmerssonjing theprognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT jiangyuanzhu theprognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT maguoyuan theprognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT wangguanghui theprognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT dongwei theprognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT sangshaowei theprognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT dujiajun theprognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT zhangxiangwei prognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT wangyang prognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT licheng prognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT helmerssonjing prognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT jiangyuanzhu prognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT maguoyuan prognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT wangguanghui prognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT dongwei prognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT sangshaowei prognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT dujiajun prognosticvalueoftumorlengthtoresectableesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy |