Cargando…

Personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (VILI)

It has been shown that mechanical ventilation in patients with, or at high-risk for, the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can be a double-edged sword. If the mechanical breath is improperly set, it can amplify the lung injury associated with ARDS, causing a secondary ventila...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieman, Gary F., Satalin, Joshua, Andrews, Penny, Aiash, Hani, Habashi, Nader M., Gatto, Louis A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28150228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-017-0121-x
_version_ 1782504460005670912
author Nieman, Gary F.
Satalin, Joshua
Andrews, Penny
Aiash, Hani
Habashi, Nader M.
Gatto, Louis A.
author_facet Nieman, Gary F.
Satalin, Joshua
Andrews, Penny
Aiash, Hani
Habashi, Nader M.
Gatto, Louis A.
author_sort Nieman, Gary F.
collection PubMed
description It has been shown that mechanical ventilation in patients with, or at high-risk for, the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can be a double-edged sword. If the mechanical breath is improperly set, it can amplify the lung injury associated with ARDS, causing a secondary ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Conversely, the mechanical breath can be adjusted to minimize VILI, which can reduce ARDS mortality. The current standard of care ventilation strategy to minimize VILI attempts to reduce alveolar over-distension and recruitment-derecruitment (R/D) by lowering tidal volume (Vt) to 6 cc/kg combined with adjusting positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on a sliding scale directed by changes in oxygenation. Thus, Vt is often but not always set as a “one-size-fits-all” approach and although PEEP is often set arbitrarily at 5 cmH(2)O, it may be personalized according to changes in a physiologic parameter, most often to oxygenation. However, there is evidence that oxygenation as a method to optimize PEEP is not congruent with the PEEP levels necessary to maintain an open and stable lung. Thus, optimal PEEP might not be personalized to the lung pathology of an individual patient using oxygenation as the physiologic feedback system. Multiple methods of personalizing PEEP have been tested and include dead space, lung compliance, lung stress and strain, ventilation patterns using computed tomography (CT) or electrical impedance tomography (EIT), inflection points on the pressure/volume curve (P/V), and the slope of the expiratory flow curve using airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). Although many studies have shown that personalizing PEEP is possible, there is no consensus as to the optimal technique. This review will assess various methods used to personalize PEEP, directed by physiologic parameters, necessary to adaptively adjust ventilator settings with progressive changes in lung pathophysiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5289131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52891312017-02-15 Personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (VILI) Nieman, Gary F. Satalin, Joshua Andrews, Penny Aiash, Hani Habashi, Nader M. Gatto, Louis A. Intensive Care Med Exp Review It has been shown that mechanical ventilation in patients with, or at high-risk for, the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can be a double-edged sword. If the mechanical breath is improperly set, it can amplify the lung injury associated with ARDS, causing a secondary ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Conversely, the mechanical breath can be adjusted to minimize VILI, which can reduce ARDS mortality. The current standard of care ventilation strategy to minimize VILI attempts to reduce alveolar over-distension and recruitment-derecruitment (R/D) by lowering tidal volume (Vt) to 6 cc/kg combined with adjusting positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on a sliding scale directed by changes in oxygenation. Thus, Vt is often but not always set as a “one-size-fits-all” approach and although PEEP is often set arbitrarily at 5 cmH(2)O, it may be personalized according to changes in a physiologic parameter, most often to oxygenation. However, there is evidence that oxygenation as a method to optimize PEEP is not congruent with the PEEP levels necessary to maintain an open and stable lung. Thus, optimal PEEP might not be personalized to the lung pathology of an individual patient using oxygenation as the physiologic feedback system. Multiple methods of personalizing PEEP have been tested and include dead space, lung compliance, lung stress and strain, ventilation patterns using computed tomography (CT) or electrical impedance tomography (EIT), inflection points on the pressure/volume curve (P/V), and the slope of the expiratory flow curve using airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). Although many studies have shown that personalizing PEEP is possible, there is no consensus as to the optimal technique. This review will assess various methods used to personalize PEEP, directed by physiologic parameters, necessary to adaptively adjust ventilator settings with progressive changes in lung pathophysiology. Springer International Publishing 2017-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5289131/ /pubmed/28150228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-017-0121-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Nieman, Gary F.
Satalin, Joshua
Andrews, Penny
Aiash, Hani
Habashi, Nader M.
Gatto, Louis A.
Personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (VILI)
title Personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (VILI)
title_full Personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (VILI)
title_fullStr Personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (VILI)
title_full_unstemmed Personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (VILI)
title_short Personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (VILI)
title_sort personalizing mechanical ventilation according to physiologic parameters to stabilize alveoli and minimize ventilator induced lung injury (vili)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28150228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-017-0121-x
work_keys_str_mv AT niemangaryf personalizingmechanicalventilationaccordingtophysiologicparameterstostabilizealveoliandminimizeventilatorinducedlunginjuryvili
AT satalinjoshua personalizingmechanicalventilationaccordingtophysiologicparameterstostabilizealveoliandminimizeventilatorinducedlunginjuryvili
AT andrewspenny personalizingmechanicalventilationaccordingtophysiologicparameterstostabilizealveoliandminimizeventilatorinducedlunginjuryvili
AT aiashhani personalizingmechanicalventilationaccordingtophysiologicparameterstostabilizealveoliandminimizeventilatorinducedlunginjuryvili
AT habashinaderm personalizingmechanicalventilationaccordingtophysiologicparameterstostabilizealveoliandminimizeventilatorinducedlunginjuryvili
AT gattolouisa personalizingmechanicalventilationaccordingtophysiologicparameterstostabilizealveoliandminimizeventilatorinducedlunginjuryvili