Cargando…
Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is usually diagnosed using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or kidney damage markers. The urine dipstick test is a widely used screening tool for albuminuria, a CKD marker. Although the urine albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) has advantages over the dipstick...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28151999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171106 |
_version_ | 1782504505328271360 |
---|---|
author | Park, Ji In Baek, Hyunjeong Kim, Bo Ra Jung, Hae Hyuk |
author_facet | Park, Ji In Baek, Hyunjeong Kim, Bo Ra Jung, Hae Hyuk |
author_sort | Park, Ji In |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is usually diagnosed using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or kidney damage markers. The urine dipstick test is a widely used screening tool for albuminuria, a CKD marker. Although the urine albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) has advantages over the dipstick test in sensitivity and quantification of levels, the two methods have not been compared in the general population. A total of 20,759 adults with urinalysis data in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2014 were examined. CKD risk categories were created using a combination of eGFR and albuminuria. Albuminuria was defined using an ACR cutoff of 30 mg/g or 300 mg/g and a urine dipstick cutoff of trace or 1+. The EQ-5D index was used for the health outcome. Prevalence estimates of ACR ≥30 mg/g and >300 mg/g vs dipstick ≥trace and ≥1+ in adults aged ≥20 years were 7.2% and 0.9% vs 9.1% and 1.2%, respectively. For ACR ≥30 mg/g detection, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values of dipstick ≥trace were 43.6%, 93.6%, 34.6%, and 95.5%, respectively. When risk categories created based on dipstick cutoffs were compared with those based on ACR cutoffs, 10.4% of the total population was reclassified to different risk categories, with only 3.9% reclassified to the same CKD category. Akaike information criterion values were lower, and non-fatal disease burdens of CKD were larger, in models predicting EQ-5D index using ACR-based categories compared to those using dipstick-based categories, even after adjusting for confounders. In conclusion, the urine dipstick test had poor sensitivity and high false-discovery rates for ACR ≥30 mg/g detection, and classified a large number of individuals into different CKD risk categories compared with ACR-based categories. Therefore, ACR assessments in CKD screening appear beneficial for a more accurate prediction of worse quality of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5289498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52894982017-02-17 Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study Park, Ji In Baek, Hyunjeong Kim, Bo Ra Jung, Hae Hyuk PLoS One Research Article Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is usually diagnosed using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or kidney damage markers. The urine dipstick test is a widely used screening tool for albuminuria, a CKD marker. Although the urine albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) has advantages over the dipstick test in sensitivity and quantification of levels, the two methods have not been compared in the general population. A total of 20,759 adults with urinalysis data in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2014 were examined. CKD risk categories were created using a combination of eGFR and albuminuria. Albuminuria was defined using an ACR cutoff of 30 mg/g or 300 mg/g and a urine dipstick cutoff of trace or 1+. The EQ-5D index was used for the health outcome. Prevalence estimates of ACR ≥30 mg/g and >300 mg/g vs dipstick ≥trace and ≥1+ in adults aged ≥20 years were 7.2% and 0.9% vs 9.1% and 1.2%, respectively. For ACR ≥30 mg/g detection, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values of dipstick ≥trace were 43.6%, 93.6%, 34.6%, and 95.5%, respectively. When risk categories created based on dipstick cutoffs were compared with those based on ACR cutoffs, 10.4% of the total population was reclassified to different risk categories, with only 3.9% reclassified to the same CKD category. Akaike information criterion values were lower, and non-fatal disease burdens of CKD were larger, in models predicting EQ-5D index using ACR-based categories compared to those using dipstick-based categories, even after adjusting for confounders. In conclusion, the urine dipstick test had poor sensitivity and high false-discovery rates for ACR ≥30 mg/g detection, and classified a large number of individuals into different CKD risk categories compared with ACR-based categories. Therefore, ACR assessments in CKD screening appear beneficial for a more accurate prediction of worse quality of life. Public Library of Science 2017-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5289498/ /pubmed/28151999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171106 Text en © 2017 Park et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Park, Ji In Baek, Hyunjeong Kim, Bo Ra Jung, Hae Hyuk Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study |
title | Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study |
title_full | Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study |
title_short | Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study |
title_sort | comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: a population-based study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28151999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkjiin comparisonofurinedipstickandalbumincreatinineratioforchronickidneydiseasescreeningapopulationbasedstudy AT baekhyunjeong comparisonofurinedipstickandalbumincreatinineratioforchronickidneydiseasescreeningapopulationbasedstudy AT kimbora comparisonofurinedipstickandalbumincreatinineratioforchronickidneydiseasescreeningapopulationbasedstudy AT junghaehyuk comparisonofurinedipstickandalbumincreatinineratioforchronickidneydiseasescreeningapopulationbasedstudy |