Cargando…

Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is usually diagnosed using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or kidney damage markers. The urine dipstick test is a widely used screening tool for albuminuria, a CKD marker. Although the urine albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) has advantages over the dipstick...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Ji In, Baek, Hyunjeong, Kim, Bo Ra, Jung, Hae Hyuk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28151999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171106
_version_ 1782504505328271360
author Park, Ji In
Baek, Hyunjeong
Kim, Bo Ra
Jung, Hae Hyuk
author_facet Park, Ji In
Baek, Hyunjeong
Kim, Bo Ra
Jung, Hae Hyuk
author_sort Park, Ji In
collection PubMed
description Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is usually diagnosed using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or kidney damage markers. The urine dipstick test is a widely used screening tool for albuminuria, a CKD marker. Although the urine albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) has advantages over the dipstick test in sensitivity and quantification of levels, the two methods have not been compared in the general population. A total of 20,759 adults with urinalysis data in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2014 were examined. CKD risk categories were created using a combination of eGFR and albuminuria. Albuminuria was defined using an ACR cutoff of 30 mg/g or 300 mg/g and a urine dipstick cutoff of trace or 1+. The EQ-5D index was used for the health outcome. Prevalence estimates of ACR ≥30 mg/g and >300 mg/g vs dipstick ≥trace and ≥1+ in adults aged ≥20 years were 7.2% and 0.9% vs 9.1% and 1.2%, respectively. For ACR ≥30 mg/g detection, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values of dipstick ≥trace were 43.6%, 93.6%, 34.6%, and 95.5%, respectively. When risk categories created based on dipstick cutoffs were compared with those based on ACR cutoffs, 10.4% of the total population was reclassified to different risk categories, with only 3.9% reclassified to the same CKD category. Akaike information criterion values were lower, and non-fatal disease burdens of CKD were larger, in models predicting EQ-5D index using ACR-based categories compared to those using dipstick-based categories, even after adjusting for confounders. In conclusion, the urine dipstick test had poor sensitivity and high false-discovery rates for ACR ≥30 mg/g detection, and classified a large number of individuals into different CKD risk categories compared with ACR-based categories. Therefore, ACR assessments in CKD screening appear beneficial for a more accurate prediction of worse quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5289498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52894982017-02-17 Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study Park, Ji In Baek, Hyunjeong Kim, Bo Ra Jung, Hae Hyuk PLoS One Research Article Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is usually diagnosed using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or kidney damage markers. The urine dipstick test is a widely used screening tool for albuminuria, a CKD marker. Although the urine albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) has advantages over the dipstick test in sensitivity and quantification of levels, the two methods have not been compared in the general population. A total of 20,759 adults with urinalysis data in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2014 were examined. CKD risk categories were created using a combination of eGFR and albuminuria. Albuminuria was defined using an ACR cutoff of 30 mg/g or 300 mg/g and a urine dipstick cutoff of trace or 1+. The EQ-5D index was used for the health outcome. Prevalence estimates of ACR ≥30 mg/g and >300 mg/g vs dipstick ≥trace and ≥1+ in adults aged ≥20 years were 7.2% and 0.9% vs 9.1% and 1.2%, respectively. For ACR ≥30 mg/g detection, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values of dipstick ≥trace were 43.6%, 93.6%, 34.6%, and 95.5%, respectively. When risk categories created based on dipstick cutoffs were compared with those based on ACR cutoffs, 10.4% of the total population was reclassified to different risk categories, with only 3.9% reclassified to the same CKD category. Akaike information criterion values were lower, and non-fatal disease burdens of CKD were larger, in models predicting EQ-5D index using ACR-based categories compared to those using dipstick-based categories, even after adjusting for confounders. In conclusion, the urine dipstick test had poor sensitivity and high false-discovery rates for ACR ≥30 mg/g detection, and classified a large number of individuals into different CKD risk categories compared with ACR-based categories. Therefore, ACR assessments in CKD screening appear beneficial for a more accurate prediction of worse quality of life. Public Library of Science 2017-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5289498/ /pubmed/28151999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171106 Text en © 2017 Park et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Ji In
Baek, Hyunjeong
Kim, Bo Ra
Jung, Hae Hyuk
Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study
title Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study
title_full Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study
title_fullStr Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study
title_short Comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: A population-based study
title_sort comparison of urine dipstick and albumin:creatinine ratio for chronic kidney disease screening: a population-based study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28151999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171106
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjiin comparisonofurinedipstickandalbumincreatinineratioforchronickidneydiseasescreeningapopulationbasedstudy
AT baekhyunjeong comparisonofurinedipstickandalbumincreatinineratioforchronickidneydiseasescreeningapopulationbasedstudy
AT kimbora comparisonofurinedipstickandalbumincreatinineratioforchronickidneydiseasescreeningapopulationbasedstudy
AT junghaehyuk comparisonofurinedipstickandalbumincreatinineratioforchronickidneydiseasescreeningapopulationbasedstudy