Cargando…

Comparison of IPV to tOPV week 39 boost of primary OPV vaccination in Indian infants: an open labelled randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The final endgame strategy of global polio eradication initiative includes switching from trivalent oral poliovirus vaccines (tOPV) to bivalent oral polio vaccine (bOPV), and introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). This study compares IPV with tOPV week 39 boost in Indian i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanungo, Suman, Kim, Deok Ryun, Haldar, Bisakha, Snider, Cynthia, Nalavade, Uma, Kim, Soon Ae, Park, Ju Yeon, Sinha, Anuradha, Mallick, Aiyel Haque, Manna, Byomkesh, Sur, Dipika, Nandy, Ranjan Kumar, Deshpande, Jagadish M., Czerkinsky, Cecil, Wierzba, Thomas F, Jr., William A Petri, Ali, Mohammad, Dey, Ayan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00223
_version_ 1782504559078277120
author Kanungo, Suman
Kim, Deok Ryun
Haldar, Bisakha
Snider, Cynthia
Nalavade, Uma
Kim, Soon Ae
Park, Ju Yeon
Sinha, Anuradha
Mallick, Aiyel Haque
Manna, Byomkesh
Sur, Dipika
Nandy, Ranjan Kumar
Deshpande, Jagadish M.
Czerkinsky, Cecil
Wierzba, Thomas F
Jr., William A Petri
Ali, Mohammad
Dey, Ayan
author_facet Kanungo, Suman
Kim, Deok Ryun
Haldar, Bisakha
Snider, Cynthia
Nalavade, Uma
Kim, Soon Ae
Park, Ju Yeon
Sinha, Anuradha
Mallick, Aiyel Haque
Manna, Byomkesh
Sur, Dipika
Nandy, Ranjan Kumar
Deshpande, Jagadish M.
Czerkinsky, Cecil
Wierzba, Thomas F
Jr., William A Petri
Ali, Mohammad
Dey, Ayan
author_sort Kanungo, Suman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The final endgame strategy of global polio eradication initiative includes switching from trivalent oral poliovirus vaccines (tOPV) to bivalent oral polio vaccine (bOPV), and introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). This study compares IPV with tOPV week 39 boost in Indian infants. METHODS: Starting 28 March 2012, we enrolled 372 Indian infant-mother pairs from Kolkata, India in an open-label, block-randomized, controlled trial comparing a 39 week tOPV to an IPV boost among infants immunized with three doses of tOPV. The primary outcome was mucosal immunity to poliovirus as measured by fecal polio virus shedding after OPV challenge. The secondary outcome was humoral response as defined by >1:8 titers for neutralizing antibodies at week 40. Seroconversion was measured by change in level of antibody titers from week 18 to week 40. The analyses were performed by both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) comparing the occurrences of outcomes between the arms of the study. FINDINGS: Both the study arms provided equivalent mucosal immunity at 52 weeks with a total shedding prevalence of 28%. Vaccination with IPV resulted in significantly higher seroconversion rates for Polio type 2 (p = 0.03) and Polio type 3 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that an IPV boost at week 39 is equivalent to tOPV in intestinal immunity, and provides higher seroconversion compared to tOPV. The major limitation of the study was the additional OPV doses receive by infants during pulse polio immunization resulted in additional mucosal boosting, diminishing the impact of IPV or tOPV boost at week 39. However, IPV for OPV boost should prove to be a step forward in the global polio eradication initiative to reduce the problem of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5289926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52899262017-02-13 Comparison of IPV to tOPV week 39 boost of primary OPV vaccination in Indian infants: an open labelled randomized controlled trial Kanungo, Suman Kim, Deok Ryun Haldar, Bisakha Snider, Cynthia Nalavade, Uma Kim, Soon Ae Park, Ju Yeon Sinha, Anuradha Mallick, Aiyel Haque Manna, Byomkesh Sur, Dipika Nandy, Ranjan Kumar Deshpande, Jagadish M. Czerkinsky, Cecil Wierzba, Thomas F Jr., William A Petri Ali, Mohammad Dey, Ayan Heliyon Article BACKGROUND: The final endgame strategy of global polio eradication initiative includes switching from trivalent oral poliovirus vaccines (tOPV) to bivalent oral polio vaccine (bOPV), and introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). This study compares IPV with tOPV week 39 boost in Indian infants. METHODS: Starting 28 March 2012, we enrolled 372 Indian infant-mother pairs from Kolkata, India in an open-label, block-randomized, controlled trial comparing a 39 week tOPV to an IPV boost among infants immunized with three doses of tOPV. The primary outcome was mucosal immunity to poliovirus as measured by fecal polio virus shedding after OPV challenge. The secondary outcome was humoral response as defined by >1:8 titers for neutralizing antibodies at week 40. Seroconversion was measured by change in level of antibody titers from week 18 to week 40. The analyses were performed by both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) comparing the occurrences of outcomes between the arms of the study. FINDINGS: Both the study arms provided equivalent mucosal immunity at 52 weeks with a total shedding prevalence of 28%. Vaccination with IPV resulted in significantly higher seroconversion rates for Polio type 2 (p = 0.03) and Polio type 3 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that an IPV boost at week 39 is equivalent to tOPV in intestinal immunity, and provides higher seroconversion compared to tOPV. The major limitation of the study was the additional OPV doses receive by infants during pulse polio immunization resulted in additional mucosal boosting, diminishing the impact of IPV or tOPV boost at week 39. However, IPV for OPV boost should prove to be a step forward in the global polio eradication initiative to reduce the problem of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV). Elsevier 2017-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5289926/ /pubmed/28194449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00223 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kanungo, Suman
Kim, Deok Ryun
Haldar, Bisakha
Snider, Cynthia
Nalavade, Uma
Kim, Soon Ae
Park, Ju Yeon
Sinha, Anuradha
Mallick, Aiyel Haque
Manna, Byomkesh
Sur, Dipika
Nandy, Ranjan Kumar
Deshpande, Jagadish M.
Czerkinsky, Cecil
Wierzba, Thomas F
Jr., William A Petri
Ali, Mohammad
Dey, Ayan
Comparison of IPV to tOPV week 39 boost of primary OPV vaccination in Indian infants: an open labelled randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of IPV to tOPV week 39 boost of primary OPV vaccination in Indian infants: an open labelled randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of IPV to tOPV week 39 boost of primary OPV vaccination in Indian infants: an open labelled randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of IPV to tOPV week 39 boost of primary OPV vaccination in Indian infants: an open labelled randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of IPV to tOPV week 39 boost of primary OPV vaccination in Indian infants: an open labelled randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of IPV to tOPV week 39 boost of primary OPV vaccination in Indian infants: an open labelled randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of ipv to topv week 39 boost of primary opv vaccination in indian infants: an open labelled randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00223
work_keys_str_mv AT kanungosuman comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimdeokryun comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haldarbisakha comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT snidercynthia comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nalavadeuma comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimsoonae comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parkjuyeon comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sinhaanuradha comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mallickaiyelhaque comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mannabyomkesh comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT surdipika comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nandyranjankumar comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT deshpandejagadishm comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT czerkinskycecil comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wierzbathomasf comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jrwilliamapetri comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT alimohammad comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT deyayan comparisonofipvtotopvweek39boostofprimaryopvvaccinationinindianinfantsanopenlabelledrandomizedcontrolledtrial