Cargando…

2500-g Low Birth Weight Cutoff: History and Implications for Future Research and Policy

Purpose To research the origins of the 2500 g cutoff for low birth weight and the evolution of indicators to identify newborns at high mortality risk. Description Early research concluded “prematurity”, measured mainly through birth weight, was responsible for increased health risks. The World Healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Michelle M., Black, Robert E., Katz, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5290050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27449779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2131-9
_version_ 1782504583830962176
author Hughes, Michelle M.
Black, Robert E.
Katz, Joanne
author_facet Hughes, Michelle M.
Black, Robert E.
Katz, Joanne
author_sort Hughes, Michelle M.
collection PubMed
description Purpose To research the origins of the 2500 g cutoff for low birth weight and the evolution of indicators to identify newborns at high mortality risk. Description Early research concluded “prematurity”, measured mainly through birth weight, was responsible for increased health risks. The World Health Organization’s original prematurity definition was birth weight ≤2500 g. 1960s research clarified the difference between gestational age and birth weight leading to questions of the causal role of birth weight for health outcomes. Focus turned to two etiologies of low birth weight, preterm births and intrauterine growth restriction, which were both causally associated with morbidity and mortality but through different pathways; a standard cutoff based on gestational age or customized cutoff was debated. Assessment While low birth weight can be due to preterm or intrauterine growth restriction (or both), the historic 2500 g cutoff remains the standard by which the majority of policy makers define low birth weight and use it to predict perinatal and infant adverse outcomes. Conclusion Current efforts to refocus research on preterm births and poor intrauterine growth are important to understanding the direct causes of mortality rather than low birth weight as a convenient surrogate. Such distinctions also allow researchers and practitioners to test and target interventions outcomes more effectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5290050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52900502017-02-16 2500-g Low Birth Weight Cutoff: History and Implications for Future Research and Policy Hughes, Michelle M. Black, Robert E. Katz, Joanne Matern Child Health J Historical Notes Purpose To research the origins of the 2500 g cutoff for low birth weight and the evolution of indicators to identify newborns at high mortality risk. Description Early research concluded “prematurity”, measured mainly through birth weight, was responsible for increased health risks. The World Health Organization’s original prematurity definition was birth weight ≤2500 g. 1960s research clarified the difference between gestational age and birth weight leading to questions of the causal role of birth weight for health outcomes. Focus turned to two etiologies of low birth weight, preterm births and intrauterine growth restriction, which were both causally associated with morbidity and mortality but through different pathways; a standard cutoff based on gestational age or customized cutoff was debated. Assessment While low birth weight can be due to preterm or intrauterine growth restriction (or both), the historic 2500 g cutoff remains the standard by which the majority of policy makers define low birth weight and use it to predict perinatal and infant adverse outcomes. Conclusion Current efforts to refocus research on preterm births and poor intrauterine growth are important to understanding the direct causes of mortality rather than low birth weight as a convenient surrogate. Such distinctions also allow researchers and practitioners to test and target interventions outcomes more effectively. Springer US 2016-07-23 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5290050/ /pubmed/27449779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2131-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Historical Notes
Hughes, Michelle M.
Black, Robert E.
Katz, Joanne
2500-g Low Birth Weight Cutoff: History and Implications for Future Research and Policy
title 2500-g Low Birth Weight Cutoff: History and Implications for Future Research and Policy
title_full 2500-g Low Birth Weight Cutoff: History and Implications for Future Research and Policy
title_fullStr 2500-g Low Birth Weight Cutoff: History and Implications for Future Research and Policy
title_full_unstemmed 2500-g Low Birth Weight Cutoff: History and Implications for Future Research and Policy
title_short 2500-g Low Birth Weight Cutoff: History and Implications for Future Research and Policy
title_sort 2500-g low birth weight cutoff: history and implications for future research and policy
topic Historical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5290050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27449779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2131-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesmichellem 2500glowbirthweightcutoffhistoryandimplicationsforfutureresearchandpolicy
AT blackroberte 2500glowbirthweightcutoffhistoryandimplicationsforfutureresearchandpolicy
AT katzjoanne 2500glowbirthweightcutoffhistoryandimplicationsforfutureresearchandpolicy