Cargando…

Criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone delivered sub-maximal fitness test for people with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Prevention of multi-morbidities following non-communicable diseases requires a systematic registration of adverse modifiable risk factors, including low physical fitness. The aim of the study was to establish criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone app (InterWalk) delivered fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinkløv, Cecilie Fau, Thorsen, Ida Kær, Karstoft, Kristian, Brøns, Charlotte, Valentiner, Laura, Langberg, Henning, Vaag, Allan Arthur, Nielsen, Jens Steen, Pedersen, Bente Klarlund, Ried-Larsen, Mathias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5290632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28174664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-016-0056-7
_version_ 1782504671473041408
author Brinkløv, Cecilie Fau
Thorsen, Ida Kær
Karstoft, Kristian
Brøns, Charlotte
Valentiner, Laura
Langberg, Henning
Vaag, Allan Arthur
Nielsen, Jens Steen
Pedersen, Bente Klarlund
Ried-Larsen, Mathias
author_facet Brinkløv, Cecilie Fau
Thorsen, Ida Kær
Karstoft, Kristian
Brøns, Charlotte
Valentiner, Laura
Langberg, Henning
Vaag, Allan Arthur
Nielsen, Jens Steen
Pedersen, Bente Klarlund
Ried-Larsen, Mathias
author_sort Brinkløv, Cecilie Fau
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prevention of multi-morbidities following non-communicable diseases requires a systematic registration of adverse modifiable risk factors, including low physical fitness. The aim of the study was to establish criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone app (InterWalk) delivered fitness test in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes (N = 27, mean (SD) age 64.2 (5.9) years, BMI 30.0 (5.1) kg/m(2), (30 % male)) completed a 7-min progressive walking protocol twice (with and without encouragement). VO(2) during the test was assessed using indirect calorimetry and the acceleration (vector magnitude) from the smartphone was obtained. The vector magnitude was used to predict VO(2peak) along with the co-variates weight, height and sex. The validity of the algorithm was tested when the smartphone was placed in the right pocket of the pants or jacket. The algorithm was validated using leave-one-out cross validation. Test-retest reliability was tested in a subset of participants (N = 10). RESULTS: The overall VO(2peak) prediction of the algorithm (R(2)) was 0.60 and 0.45 when the smartphone was placed in the pockets of the pants and jacket, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean bias (limits of agreement) in the cross validation was−0.4 (38) % (pants) and−0.1 (46) % (jacket). When the smartphone was placed in the jacket a significant intensity dependent bias (r = 0.5, p = 0.02) was observed. The test-retest intraclass correlations were 0.85 and 0.86 (p < 0.001), for the pants and jacket, respectively. No effects of encouragement were observed on test performance. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the InterWalk Fitness Test is accurate and reliable for persons with type 2 diabetes when the smartphone is placed in the side pocket of the pants for. The test could give a fair estimate of the CRF in absence of a progressive maximal test during standardized conditions with the appropriate equipment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.org (NCT02089477), first registered (prospectively) on March 14th 2014
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5290632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52906322017-02-07 Criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone delivered sub-maximal fitness test for people with type 2 diabetes Brinkløv, Cecilie Fau Thorsen, Ida Kær Karstoft, Kristian Brøns, Charlotte Valentiner, Laura Langberg, Henning Vaag, Allan Arthur Nielsen, Jens Steen Pedersen, Bente Klarlund Ried-Larsen, Mathias BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Prevention of multi-morbidities following non-communicable diseases requires a systematic registration of adverse modifiable risk factors, including low physical fitness. The aim of the study was to establish criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone app (InterWalk) delivered fitness test in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes (N = 27, mean (SD) age 64.2 (5.9) years, BMI 30.0 (5.1) kg/m(2), (30 % male)) completed a 7-min progressive walking protocol twice (with and without encouragement). VO(2) during the test was assessed using indirect calorimetry and the acceleration (vector magnitude) from the smartphone was obtained. The vector magnitude was used to predict VO(2peak) along with the co-variates weight, height and sex. The validity of the algorithm was tested when the smartphone was placed in the right pocket of the pants or jacket. The algorithm was validated using leave-one-out cross validation. Test-retest reliability was tested in a subset of participants (N = 10). RESULTS: The overall VO(2peak) prediction of the algorithm (R(2)) was 0.60 and 0.45 when the smartphone was placed in the pockets of the pants and jacket, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean bias (limits of agreement) in the cross validation was−0.4 (38) % (pants) and−0.1 (46) % (jacket). When the smartphone was placed in the jacket a significant intensity dependent bias (r = 0.5, p = 0.02) was observed. The test-retest intraclass correlations were 0.85 and 0.86 (p < 0.001), for the pants and jacket, respectively. No effects of encouragement were observed on test performance. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the InterWalk Fitness Test is accurate and reliable for persons with type 2 diabetes when the smartphone is placed in the side pocket of the pants for. The test could give a fair estimate of the CRF in absence of a progressive maximal test during standardized conditions with the appropriate equipment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.org (NCT02089477), first registered (prospectively) on March 14th 2014 BioMed Central 2016-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5290632/ /pubmed/28174664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-016-0056-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Brinkløv, Cecilie Fau
Thorsen, Ida Kær
Karstoft, Kristian
Brøns, Charlotte
Valentiner, Laura
Langberg, Henning
Vaag, Allan Arthur
Nielsen, Jens Steen
Pedersen, Bente Klarlund
Ried-Larsen, Mathias
Criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone delivered sub-maximal fitness test for people with type 2 diabetes
title Criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone delivered sub-maximal fitness test for people with type 2 diabetes
title_full Criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone delivered sub-maximal fitness test for people with type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone delivered sub-maximal fitness test for people with type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone delivered sub-maximal fitness test for people with type 2 diabetes
title_short Criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone delivered sub-maximal fitness test for people with type 2 diabetes
title_sort criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone delivered sub-maximal fitness test for people with type 2 diabetes
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5290632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28174664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-016-0056-7
work_keys_str_mv AT brinkløvceciliefau criterionvalidityandreliabilityofasmartphonedeliveredsubmaximalfitnesstestforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT thorsenidakær criterionvalidityandreliabilityofasmartphonedeliveredsubmaximalfitnesstestforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT karstoftkristian criterionvalidityandreliabilityofasmartphonedeliveredsubmaximalfitnesstestforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT brønscharlotte criterionvalidityandreliabilityofasmartphonedeliveredsubmaximalfitnesstestforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT valentinerlaura criterionvalidityandreliabilityofasmartphonedeliveredsubmaximalfitnesstestforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT langberghenning criterionvalidityandreliabilityofasmartphonedeliveredsubmaximalfitnesstestforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT vaagallanarthur criterionvalidityandreliabilityofasmartphonedeliveredsubmaximalfitnesstestforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT nielsenjenssteen criterionvalidityandreliabilityofasmartphonedeliveredsubmaximalfitnesstestforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT pedersenbenteklarlund criterionvalidityandreliabilityofasmartphonedeliveredsubmaximalfitnesstestforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT riedlarsenmathias criterionvalidityandreliabilityofasmartphonedeliveredsubmaximalfitnesstestforpeoplewithtype2diabetes