Cargando…

Comparison of Leishmania typing results obtained from 16 European clinical laboratories in 2014

Leishmaniasis is endemic in southern Europe, and in other European countries cases are diagnosed in travellers who have visited affected areas both within the continent and beyond. Prompt and accurate diagnosis poses a challenge in clinical practice in Europe. Different methods exist for identificat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van der Auwera, Gert, Bart, Aldert, Chicharro, Carmen, Cortes, Sofia, Davidsson, Leigh, Di Muccio, Trentina, Dujardin, Jean-Claude, Felger, Ingrid, Paglia, Maria Grazia, Grimm, Felix, Harms, Gundel, Jaffe, Charles L., Manser, Monika, Ravel, Christophe, Robert-Gangneux, Florence, Roelfsema, Jeroen, Töz, Seray, Verweij, Jaco J., Chiodini, Peter L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27983510
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.49.30418
_version_ 1782504731945467904
author Van der Auwera, Gert
Bart, Aldert
Chicharro, Carmen
Cortes, Sofia
Davidsson, Leigh
Di Muccio, Trentina
Dujardin, Jean-Claude
Felger, Ingrid
Paglia, Maria Grazia
Grimm, Felix
Harms, Gundel
Jaffe, Charles L.
Manser, Monika
Ravel, Christophe
Robert-Gangneux, Florence
Roelfsema, Jeroen
Töz, Seray
Verweij, Jaco J.
Chiodini, Peter L.
author_facet Van der Auwera, Gert
Bart, Aldert
Chicharro, Carmen
Cortes, Sofia
Davidsson, Leigh
Di Muccio, Trentina
Dujardin, Jean-Claude
Felger, Ingrid
Paglia, Maria Grazia
Grimm, Felix
Harms, Gundel
Jaffe, Charles L.
Manser, Monika
Ravel, Christophe
Robert-Gangneux, Florence
Roelfsema, Jeroen
Töz, Seray
Verweij, Jaco J.
Chiodini, Peter L.
author_sort Van der Auwera, Gert
collection PubMed
description Leishmaniasis is endemic in southern Europe, and in other European countries cases are diagnosed in travellers who have visited affected areas both within the continent and beyond. Prompt and accurate diagnosis poses a challenge in clinical practice in Europe. Different methods exist for identification of the infecting Leishmania species. Sixteen clinical laboratories in 10 European countries, plus Israel and Turkey, conducted a study to assess their genotyping performance. DNA from 21 promastigote cultures of 13 species was analysed blindly by the routinely used typing method. Five different molecular targets were used, which were analysed with PCR-based methods. Different levels of identification were achieved, and either the Leishmania subgenus, species complex, or actual species were reported. The overall error rate of strains placed in the wrong complex or species was 8.5%. Various reasons for incorrect typing were identified. The study shows there is considerable room for improvement and standardisation of Leishmania typing. The use of well validated standard operating procedures is recommended, covering testing, interpretation, and reporting guidelines. Application of the internal transcribed spacer 1 of the rDNA array should be restricted to Old World samples, while the heat-shock protein 70 gene and the mini-exon can be applied globally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5291127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52911272017-02-06 Comparison of Leishmania typing results obtained from 16 European clinical laboratories in 2014 Van der Auwera, Gert Bart, Aldert Chicharro, Carmen Cortes, Sofia Davidsson, Leigh Di Muccio, Trentina Dujardin, Jean-Claude Felger, Ingrid Paglia, Maria Grazia Grimm, Felix Harms, Gundel Jaffe, Charles L. Manser, Monika Ravel, Christophe Robert-Gangneux, Florence Roelfsema, Jeroen Töz, Seray Verweij, Jaco J. Chiodini, Peter L. Euro Surveill Research Article Leishmaniasis is endemic in southern Europe, and in other European countries cases are diagnosed in travellers who have visited affected areas both within the continent and beyond. Prompt and accurate diagnosis poses a challenge in clinical practice in Europe. Different methods exist for identification of the infecting Leishmania species. Sixteen clinical laboratories in 10 European countries, plus Israel and Turkey, conducted a study to assess their genotyping performance. DNA from 21 promastigote cultures of 13 species was analysed blindly by the routinely used typing method. Five different molecular targets were used, which were analysed with PCR-based methods. Different levels of identification were achieved, and either the Leishmania subgenus, species complex, or actual species were reported. The overall error rate of strains placed in the wrong complex or species was 8.5%. Various reasons for incorrect typing were identified. The study shows there is considerable room for improvement and standardisation of Leishmania typing. The use of well validated standard operating procedures is recommended, covering testing, interpretation, and reporting guidelines. Application of the internal transcribed spacer 1 of the rDNA array should be restricted to Old World samples, while the heat-shock protein 70 gene and the mini-exon can be applied globally. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2016-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5291127/ /pubmed/27983510 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.49.30418 Text en This article is copyright of The Authors, 2016. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Van der Auwera, Gert
Bart, Aldert
Chicharro, Carmen
Cortes, Sofia
Davidsson, Leigh
Di Muccio, Trentina
Dujardin, Jean-Claude
Felger, Ingrid
Paglia, Maria Grazia
Grimm, Felix
Harms, Gundel
Jaffe, Charles L.
Manser, Monika
Ravel, Christophe
Robert-Gangneux, Florence
Roelfsema, Jeroen
Töz, Seray
Verweij, Jaco J.
Chiodini, Peter L.
Comparison of Leishmania typing results obtained from 16 European clinical laboratories in 2014
title Comparison of Leishmania typing results obtained from 16 European clinical laboratories in 2014
title_full Comparison of Leishmania typing results obtained from 16 European clinical laboratories in 2014
title_fullStr Comparison of Leishmania typing results obtained from 16 European clinical laboratories in 2014
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Leishmania typing results obtained from 16 European clinical laboratories in 2014
title_short Comparison of Leishmania typing results obtained from 16 European clinical laboratories in 2014
title_sort comparison of leishmania typing results obtained from 16 european clinical laboratories in 2014
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27983510
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.49.30418
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderauweragert comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT bartaldert comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT chicharrocarmen comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT cortessofia comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT davidssonleigh comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT dimucciotrentina comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT dujardinjeanclaude comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT felgeringrid comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT pagliamariagrazia comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT grimmfelix comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT harmsgundel comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT jaffecharlesl comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT mansermonika comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT ravelchristophe comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT robertgangneuxflorence comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT roelfsemajeroen comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT tozseray comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT verweijjacoj comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014
AT chiodinipeterl comparisonofleishmaniatypingresultsobtainedfrom16europeanclinicallaboratoriesin2014