Cargando…

Evaluation of molecular typing of foodborne pathogens in European reference laboratories from 2012 to 2013

In 2012, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) initiated external quality assessment (EQA) schemes for molecular typing including the National Public Health Reference Laboratories in Europe. The overall aim for these EQA schemes was to enhance the European surveillance of foo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schjørring, Susanne, Niskanen, Taina, Torpdahl, Mia, Björkman, Jonas T, Nielsen, Eva Møller
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28006653
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.50.30429
_version_ 1782504734413815808
author Schjørring, Susanne
Niskanen, Taina
Torpdahl, Mia
Björkman, Jonas T
Nielsen, Eva Møller
author_facet Schjørring, Susanne
Niskanen, Taina
Torpdahl, Mia
Björkman, Jonas T
Nielsen, Eva Møller
author_sort Schjørring, Susanne
collection PubMed
description In 2012, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) initiated external quality assessment (EQA) schemes for molecular typing including the National Public Health Reference Laboratories in Europe. The overall aim for these EQA schemes was to enhance the European surveillance of food-borne pathogens by evaluating and improving the quality and comparability of molecular typing. The EQAs were organised by Statens Serum Institut (SSI) and included Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica, verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) and Listeria monocytogenes. Inter-laboratory comparable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) images were obtained from 10 of 17 of the participating laboratories for Listeria, 15 of 25 for Salmonella, but only nine of 20 for VTEC. Most problems were related to PFGE running conditions and/or incorrect use of image acquisition. Analysis of the gels was done in good accordance with the provided guidelines. Furthermore, we assessed the multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) scheme for S. Typhimurium. Of 15 laboratories, nine submitted correct results for all analysed strains, and four had difficulties with one strain only. In conclusion, both PFGE and MLVA are prone to variation in quality, and there is therefore a continuous need for standardisation and validation of laboratory performance for molecular typing methods of food-borne pathogens in the human public health sector.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5291138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52911382017-02-06 Evaluation of molecular typing of foodborne pathogens in European reference laboratories from 2012 to 2013 Schjørring, Susanne Niskanen, Taina Torpdahl, Mia Björkman, Jonas T Nielsen, Eva Møller Euro Surveill Surveillance and Outbreak Report In 2012, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) initiated external quality assessment (EQA) schemes for molecular typing including the National Public Health Reference Laboratories in Europe. The overall aim for these EQA schemes was to enhance the European surveillance of food-borne pathogens by evaluating and improving the quality and comparability of molecular typing. The EQAs were organised by Statens Serum Institut (SSI) and included Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica, verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) and Listeria monocytogenes. Inter-laboratory comparable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) images were obtained from 10 of 17 of the participating laboratories for Listeria, 15 of 25 for Salmonella, but only nine of 20 for VTEC. Most problems were related to PFGE running conditions and/or incorrect use of image acquisition. Analysis of the gels was done in good accordance with the provided guidelines. Furthermore, we assessed the multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) scheme for S. Typhimurium. Of 15 laboratories, nine submitted correct results for all analysed strains, and four had difficulties with one strain only. In conclusion, both PFGE and MLVA are prone to variation in quality, and there is therefore a continuous need for standardisation and validation of laboratory performance for molecular typing methods of food-borne pathogens in the human public health sector. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2016-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5291138/ /pubmed/28006653 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.50.30429 Text en This article is copyright of The Authors, 2016. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Surveillance and Outbreak Report
Schjørring, Susanne
Niskanen, Taina
Torpdahl, Mia
Björkman, Jonas T
Nielsen, Eva Møller
Evaluation of molecular typing of foodborne pathogens in European reference laboratories from 2012 to 2013
title Evaluation of molecular typing of foodborne pathogens in European reference laboratories from 2012 to 2013
title_full Evaluation of molecular typing of foodborne pathogens in European reference laboratories from 2012 to 2013
title_fullStr Evaluation of molecular typing of foodborne pathogens in European reference laboratories from 2012 to 2013
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of molecular typing of foodborne pathogens in European reference laboratories from 2012 to 2013
title_short Evaluation of molecular typing of foodborne pathogens in European reference laboratories from 2012 to 2013
title_sort evaluation of molecular typing of foodborne pathogens in european reference laboratories from 2012 to 2013
topic Surveillance and Outbreak Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28006653
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.50.30429
work_keys_str_mv AT schjørringsusanne evaluationofmoleculartypingoffoodbornepathogensineuropeanreferencelaboratoriesfrom2012to2013
AT niskanentaina evaluationofmoleculartypingoffoodbornepathogensineuropeanreferencelaboratoriesfrom2012to2013
AT torpdahlmia evaluationofmoleculartypingoffoodbornepathogensineuropeanreferencelaboratoriesfrom2012to2013
AT bjorkmanjonast evaluationofmoleculartypingoffoodbornepathogensineuropeanreferencelaboratoriesfrom2012to2013
AT nielsenevamøller evaluationofmoleculartypingoffoodbornepathogensineuropeanreferencelaboratoriesfrom2012to2013