Cargando…

The progression of replication forks at natural replication barriers in live bacteria

Protein–DNA complexes are one of the principal barriers the replisome encounters during replication. One such barrier is the Tus–ter complex, which is a direction dependent barrier for replication fork progression. The details concerning the dynamics of the replisome when encountering these Tus–ter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moolman, M. Charl, Tiruvadi Krishnan, Sriram, Kerssemakers, Jacob W.J., de Leeuw, Roy, Lorent, Vincent, Sherratt, David J., Dekker, Nynke H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27166373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw397
_version_ 1782504750136164352
author Moolman, M. Charl
Tiruvadi Krishnan, Sriram
Kerssemakers, Jacob W.J.
de Leeuw, Roy
Lorent, Vincent
Sherratt, David J.
Dekker, Nynke H.
author_facet Moolman, M. Charl
Tiruvadi Krishnan, Sriram
Kerssemakers, Jacob W.J.
de Leeuw, Roy
Lorent, Vincent
Sherratt, David J.
Dekker, Nynke H.
author_sort Moolman, M. Charl
collection PubMed
description Protein–DNA complexes are one of the principal barriers the replisome encounters during replication. One such barrier is the Tus–ter complex, which is a direction dependent barrier for replication fork progression. The details concerning the dynamics of the replisome when encountering these Tus–ter barriers in the cell are poorly understood. By performing quantitative fluorescence microscopy with microfuidics, we investigate the effect on the replisome when encountering these barriers in live Escherichia coli cells. We make use of an E. coli variant that includes only an ectopic origin of replication that is positioned such that one of the two replisomes encounters a Tus–ter barrier before the other replisome. This enables us to single out the effect of encountering a Tus–ter roadblock on an individual replisome. We demonstrate that the replisome remains stably bound after encountering a Tus–ter complex from the non-permissive direction. Furthermore, the replisome is only transiently blocked, and continues replication beyond the barrier. Additionally, we demonstrate that these barriers affect sister chromosome segregation by visualizing specific chromosomal loci in the presence and absence of the Tus protein. These observations demonstrate the resilience of the replication fork to natural barriers and the sensitivity of chromosome alignment to fork progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5291258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52912582017-02-10 The progression of replication forks at natural replication barriers in live bacteria Moolman, M. Charl Tiruvadi Krishnan, Sriram Kerssemakers, Jacob W.J. de Leeuw, Roy Lorent, Vincent Sherratt, David J. Dekker, Nynke H. Nucleic Acids Res Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication Protein–DNA complexes are one of the principal barriers the replisome encounters during replication. One such barrier is the Tus–ter complex, which is a direction dependent barrier for replication fork progression. The details concerning the dynamics of the replisome when encountering these Tus–ter barriers in the cell are poorly understood. By performing quantitative fluorescence microscopy with microfuidics, we investigate the effect on the replisome when encountering these barriers in live Escherichia coli cells. We make use of an E. coli variant that includes only an ectopic origin of replication that is positioned such that one of the two replisomes encounters a Tus–ter barrier before the other replisome. This enables us to single out the effect of encountering a Tus–ter roadblock on an individual replisome. We demonstrate that the replisome remains stably bound after encountering a Tus–ter complex from the non-permissive direction. Furthermore, the replisome is only transiently blocked, and continues replication beyond the barrier. Additionally, we demonstrate that these barriers affect sister chromosome segregation by visualizing specific chromosomal loci in the presence and absence of the Tus protein. These observations demonstrate the resilience of the replication fork to natural barriers and the sensitivity of chromosome alignment to fork progression. Oxford University Press 2016-07-27 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5291258/ /pubmed/27166373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw397 Text en © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication
Moolman, M. Charl
Tiruvadi Krishnan, Sriram
Kerssemakers, Jacob W.J.
de Leeuw, Roy
Lorent, Vincent
Sherratt, David J.
Dekker, Nynke H.
The progression of replication forks at natural replication barriers in live bacteria
title The progression of replication forks at natural replication barriers in live bacteria
title_full The progression of replication forks at natural replication barriers in live bacteria
title_fullStr The progression of replication forks at natural replication barriers in live bacteria
title_full_unstemmed The progression of replication forks at natural replication barriers in live bacteria
title_short The progression of replication forks at natural replication barriers in live bacteria
title_sort progression of replication forks at natural replication barriers in live bacteria
topic Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27166373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw397
work_keys_str_mv AT moolmanmcharl theprogressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT tiruvadikrishnansriram theprogressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT kerssemakersjacobwj theprogressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT deleeuwroy theprogressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT lorentvincent theprogressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT sherrattdavidj theprogressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT dekkernynkeh theprogressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT moolmanmcharl progressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT tiruvadikrishnansriram progressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT kerssemakersjacobwj progressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT deleeuwroy progressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT lorentvincent progressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT sherrattdavidj progressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria
AT dekkernynkeh progressionofreplicationforksatnaturalreplicationbarriersinlivebacteria