Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Liposomal Albendazole and Tablet-Albendazole Against Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial

In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of liposomal albendazole (L-ABZ) and tablet-albendazole (T-ABZ) for the treatment of human hepatic cystic echinococcosis (CE). Sixty patients with single cyst (CE1) or daughter cyst (CE2) were included in this study and were nonrandomly divide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Haitao, Song, Tao, Shao, Yingmei, Aili, Tuergan, Ahan, Ayifuhan, Wen, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26825878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002237
_version_ 1782504799368904704
author Li, Haitao
Song, Tao
Shao, Yingmei
Aili, Tuergan
Ahan, Ayifuhan
Wen, Hao
author_facet Li, Haitao
Song, Tao
Shao, Yingmei
Aili, Tuergan
Ahan, Ayifuhan
Wen, Hao
author_sort Li, Haitao
collection PubMed
description In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of liposomal albendazole (L-ABZ) and tablet-albendazole (T-ABZ) for the treatment of human hepatic cystic echinococcosis (CE). Sixty patients with single cyst (CE1) or daughter cyst (CE2) were included in this study and were nonrandomly divided into the L-ABZ group (n = 30, 10 mg/kg per day, p.o., b.i.d.) and T-ABZ group (n = 30, 12–20 mg/kg per day, p.o., b.i.d.), respectively. The treatment duration lasted for 6 months, during which dynamic follow-up was carried out to evaluate the clinical efficacy through calculating the total effective rates (TERs). Measurement data and numerous data were analyzed by the chi-square test. Two-sided tests were performed for all the statistical tests. In our study, 2 patients were lost in the follow-up in the L-ABZ group. One patient was lost in the follow-up in the T-ABZ group, and 1 patient was withdrawal from the study due to receiving surgery. Significant difference was identified in the 3-month TERs of L-ABZ group and T-ABZ group (33.3% vs 76.7%, P < 0.05). Also, remarkable difference was noted in the 6-month TERs in the L-ABZ group and T-ABZ group (66.7% vs 93.3%, P = 0.01). No statistical difference was noticed in the incidence rate of adverse reactions in both groups (P > 0.05). Based on our study, both T-ABZ and L-ABZ are effective for treating human CE. The TER in the L-ABZ group is superior to that of T-ABZ.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5291548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52915482017-02-09 Comparative Evaluation of Liposomal Albendazole and Tablet-Albendazole Against Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial Li, Haitao Song, Tao Shao, Yingmei Aili, Tuergan Ahan, Ayifuhan Wen, Hao Medicine (Baltimore) 4200 In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of liposomal albendazole (L-ABZ) and tablet-albendazole (T-ABZ) for the treatment of human hepatic cystic echinococcosis (CE). Sixty patients with single cyst (CE1) or daughter cyst (CE2) were included in this study and were nonrandomly divided into the L-ABZ group (n = 30, 10 mg/kg per day, p.o., b.i.d.) and T-ABZ group (n = 30, 12–20 mg/kg per day, p.o., b.i.d.), respectively. The treatment duration lasted for 6 months, during which dynamic follow-up was carried out to evaluate the clinical efficacy through calculating the total effective rates (TERs). Measurement data and numerous data were analyzed by the chi-square test. Two-sided tests were performed for all the statistical tests. In our study, 2 patients were lost in the follow-up in the L-ABZ group. One patient was lost in the follow-up in the T-ABZ group, and 1 patient was withdrawal from the study due to receiving surgery. Significant difference was identified in the 3-month TERs of L-ABZ group and T-ABZ group (33.3% vs 76.7%, P < 0.05). Also, remarkable difference was noted in the 6-month TERs in the L-ABZ group and T-ABZ group (66.7% vs 93.3%, P = 0.01). No statistical difference was noticed in the incidence rate of adverse reactions in both groups (P > 0.05). Based on our study, both T-ABZ and L-ABZ are effective for treating human CE. The TER in the L-ABZ group is superior to that of T-ABZ. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5291548/ /pubmed/26825878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002237 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
spellingShingle 4200
Li, Haitao
Song, Tao
Shao, Yingmei
Aili, Tuergan
Ahan, Ayifuhan
Wen, Hao
Comparative Evaluation of Liposomal Albendazole and Tablet-Albendazole Against Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title Comparative Evaluation of Liposomal Albendazole and Tablet-Albendazole Against Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Liposomal Albendazole and Tablet-Albendazole Against Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Liposomal Albendazole and Tablet-Albendazole Against Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Liposomal Albendazole and Tablet-Albendazole Against Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Liposomal Albendazole and Tablet-Albendazole Against Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort comparative evaluation of liposomal albendazole and tablet-albendazole against hepatic cystic echinococcosis: a non-randomized clinical trial
topic 4200
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26825878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002237
work_keys_str_mv AT lihaitao comparativeevaluationofliposomalalbendazoleandtabletalbendazoleagainsthepaticcysticechinococcosisanonrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT songtao comparativeevaluationofliposomalalbendazoleandtabletalbendazoleagainsthepaticcysticechinococcosisanonrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT shaoyingmei comparativeevaluationofliposomalalbendazoleandtabletalbendazoleagainsthepaticcysticechinococcosisanonrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ailituergan comparativeevaluationofliposomalalbendazoleandtabletalbendazoleagainsthepaticcysticechinococcosisanonrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ahanayifuhan comparativeevaluationofliposomalalbendazoleandtabletalbendazoleagainsthepaticcysticechinococcosisanonrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wenhao comparativeevaluationofliposomalalbendazoleandtabletalbendazoleagainsthepaticcysticechinococcosisanonrandomizedclinicaltrial