Cargando…
Meta-Analysis of Saturated Fatty Acid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk
The associations between saturated fatty acid (SFA) consumption and risk of breast cancer (BC) remains inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to determine the quantitative relations between dietary SFA intake and incidence of BC. Literatures published up to April 2015 were systemat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26717389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002391 |
_version_ | 1782504817745199104 |
---|---|
author | Xia, Hui Ma, Shushu Wang, Shaokang Sun, Guiju |
author_facet | Xia, Hui Ma, Shushu Wang, Shaokang Sun, Guiju |
author_sort | Xia, Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | The associations between saturated fatty acid (SFA) consumption and risk of breast cancer (BC) remains inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to determine the quantitative relations between dietary SFA intake and incidence of BC. Literatures published up to April 2015 were systematically screened through Pubmed and Web of Science. Relevant publication quality was evaluated by conducting the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We used fixed effects models or random effect models to calculate the summary relative risks (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs), and conducted sensitivity analyses and evaluated the publication bias. We identified a total of 52 studies (24 cohort studies and 28 case–control studies), with over 50,000 females diagnosed with BC. The associations between dietary SFA intake and risk of BC were 1.18 for case–control studies (high vs low intake, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03–1.34) and 1.04 for cohort studies (95% CI = 0.97–1.11). When restricted analyses to population-based studies, positive associations were observed for both cohort (RR [95% CI] = 1.11 [1.01–1.21]) and case–control studies (OR [95% CI] = 1.26 [1.03–1.53]). Additionally, for case–control studies, significant positive associations between higher SFA intake and BC risk were observed for Asian (OR [95% CI] = 1.17 [1.02–1.34]) and Caucasian (OR [95% CI] = 1.19 [1.00–1.41]), as well as for postmenopausal women (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02–1.73). In contrast, higher dietary SFA intake was not associated with risk of BC among premenopausal women, in cohort studies or hospital-based studies. A positive association between higher dietary SFA intake and postmenopausal BC risk was observed in case–control but not in cohort studies. More studies are warranted to confirm these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5291630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52916302017-02-09 Meta-Analysis of Saturated Fatty Acid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk Xia, Hui Ma, Shushu Wang, Shaokang Sun, Guiju Medicine (Baltimore) 5500 The associations between saturated fatty acid (SFA) consumption and risk of breast cancer (BC) remains inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to determine the quantitative relations between dietary SFA intake and incidence of BC. Literatures published up to April 2015 were systematically screened through Pubmed and Web of Science. Relevant publication quality was evaluated by conducting the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We used fixed effects models or random effect models to calculate the summary relative risks (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs), and conducted sensitivity analyses and evaluated the publication bias. We identified a total of 52 studies (24 cohort studies and 28 case–control studies), with over 50,000 females diagnosed with BC. The associations between dietary SFA intake and risk of BC were 1.18 for case–control studies (high vs low intake, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03–1.34) and 1.04 for cohort studies (95% CI = 0.97–1.11). When restricted analyses to population-based studies, positive associations were observed for both cohort (RR [95% CI] = 1.11 [1.01–1.21]) and case–control studies (OR [95% CI] = 1.26 [1.03–1.53]). Additionally, for case–control studies, significant positive associations between higher SFA intake and BC risk were observed for Asian (OR [95% CI] = 1.17 [1.02–1.34]) and Caucasian (OR [95% CI] = 1.19 [1.00–1.41]), as well as for postmenopausal women (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02–1.73). In contrast, higher dietary SFA intake was not associated with risk of BC among premenopausal women, in cohort studies or hospital-based studies. A positive association between higher dietary SFA intake and postmenopausal BC risk was observed in case–control but not in cohort studies. More studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5291630/ /pubmed/26717389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002391 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5500 Xia, Hui Ma, Shushu Wang, Shaokang Sun, Guiju Meta-Analysis of Saturated Fatty Acid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk |
title | Meta-Analysis of Saturated Fatty Acid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk |
title_full | Meta-Analysis of Saturated Fatty Acid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk |
title_fullStr | Meta-Analysis of Saturated Fatty Acid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-Analysis of Saturated Fatty Acid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk |
title_short | Meta-Analysis of Saturated Fatty Acid Intake and Breast Cancer Risk |
title_sort | meta-analysis of saturated fatty acid intake and breast cancer risk |
topic | 5500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26717389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002391 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiahui metaanalysisofsaturatedfattyacidintakeandbreastcancerrisk AT mashushu metaanalysisofsaturatedfattyacidintakeandbreastcancerrisk AT wangshaokang metaanalysisofsaturatedfattyacidintakeandbreastcancerrisk AT sunguiju metaanalysisofsaturatedfattyacidintakeandbreastcancerrisk |