Cargando…

Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND: Many systematic reviews exist on the use of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions to improve clinical outcomes and psychological well-being of patients with heart failure. However, research is broadly distributed from simple telephone-based to complex technology-based interventio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bashi, Nazli, Karunanithi, Mohanraj, Fatehi, Farhad, Ding, Hang, Walters, Darren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28108430
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6571
_version_ 1782504840722644992
author Bashi, Nazli
Karunanithi, Mohanraj
Fatehi, Farhad
Ding, Hang
Walters, Darren
author_facet Bashi, Nazli
Karunanithi, Mohanraj
Fatehi, Farhad
Ding, Hang
Walters, Darren
author_sort Bashi, Nazli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many systematic reviews exist on the use of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions to improve clinical outcomes and psychological well-being of patients with heart failure. However, research is broadly distributed from simple telephone-based to complex technology-based interventions. The scope and focus of such evidence also vary widely, creating challenges for clinicians who seek information on the effect of RPM interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of RPM interventions on the health outcomes of patients with heart failure by synthesizing review-level evidence. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2015. We screened reviews based on relevance to RPM interventions using criteria developed for this overview. Independent authors screened, selected, and extracted information from systematic reviews. AMSTAR (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) was used to assess the methodological quality of individual reviews. We used standardized language to summarize results across reviews and to provide final statements about intervention effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 19 systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria. Reviews consisted of RPM with diverse interventions such as telemonitoring, home telehealth, mobile phone–based monitoring, and videoconferencing. All-cause mortality and heart failure mortality were the most frequently reported outcomes, but others such as quality of life, rehospitalization, emergency department visits, and length of stay were also reported. Self-care and knowledge were less commonly identified. CONCLUSIONS: Telemonitoring and home telehealth appear generally effective in reducing heart failure rehospitalization and mortality. Other interventions, including the use of mobile phone–based monitoring and videoconferencing, require further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5291866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52918662017-02-15 Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews Bashi, Nazli Karunanithi, Mohanraj Fatehi, Farhad Ding, Hang Walters, Darren J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Many systematic reviews exist on the use of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions to improve clinical outcomes and psychological well-being of patients with heart failure. However, research is broadly distributed from simple telephone-based to complex technology-based interventions. The scope and focus of such evidence also vary widely, creating challenges for clinicians who seek information on the effect of RPM interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of RPM interventions on the health outcomes of patients with heart failure by synthesizing review-level evidence. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2015. We screened reviews based on relevance to RPM interventions using criteria developed for this overview. Independent authors screened, selected, and extracted information from systematic reviews. AMSTAR (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) was used to assess the methodological quality of individual reviews. We used standardized language to summarize results across reviews and to provide final statements about intervention effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 19 systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria. Reviews consisted of RPM with diverse interventions such as telemonitoring, home telehealth, mobile phone–based monitoring, and videoconferencing. All-cause mortality and heart failure mortality were the most frequently reported outcomes, but others such as quality of life, rehospitalization, emergency department visits, and length of stay were also reported. Self-care and knowledge were less commonly identified. CONCLUSIONS: Telemonitoring and home telehealth appear generally effective in reducing heart failure rehospitalization and mortality. Other interventions, including the use of mobile phone–based monitoring and videoconferencing, require further investigation. JMIR Publications 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5291866/ /pubmed/28108430 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6571 Text en ©Nazli Bashi, Mohanraj Karunanithi, Farhad Fatehi, Hang Ding, Darren Walters. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 20.01.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Bashi, Nazli
Karunanithi, Mohanraj
Fatehi, Farhad
Ding, Hang
Walters, Darren
Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
title Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_full Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_fullStr Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_short Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_sort remote monitoring of patients with heart failure: an overview of systematic reviews
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28108430
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6571
work_keys_str_mv AT bashinazli remotemonitoringofpatientswithheartfailureanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT karunanithimohanraj remotemonitoringofpatientswithheartfailureanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT fatehifarhad remotemonitoringofpatientswithheartfailureanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT dinghang remotemonitoringofpatientswithheartfailureanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT waltersdarren remotemonitoringofpatientswithheartfailureanoverviewofsystematicreviews