Cargando…

Diversity analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm using the CottonSNP63K Array

BACKGROUND: Cotton germplasm resources contain beneficial alleles that can be exploited to develop germplasm adapted to emerging environmental and climate conditions. Accessions and lines have traditionally been characterized based on phenotypes, but phenotypic profiles are limited by the cost, time...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hinze, Lori L., Hulse-Kemp, Amanda M., Wilson, Iain W., Zhu, Qian-Hao, Llewellyn, Danny J., Taylor, Jen M., Spriggs, Andrew, Fang, David D., Ulloa, Mauricio, Burke, John J., Giband, Marc, Lacape, Jean-Marc, Van Deynze, Allen, Udall, Joshua A., Scheffler, Jodi A., Hague, Steve, Wendel, Jonathan F., Pepper, Alan E., Frelichowski, James, Lawley, Cindy T., Jones, Don C., Percy, Richard G., Stelly, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28158969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0981-y
_version_ 1782504855066116096
author Hinze, Lori L.
Hulse-Kemp, Amanda M.
Wilson, Iain W.
Zhu, Qian-Hao
Llewellyn, Danny J.
Taylor, Jen M.
Spriggs, Andrew
Fang, David D.
Ulloa, Mauricio
Burke, John J.
Giband, Marc
Lacape, Jean-Marc
Van Deynze, Allen
Udall, Joshua A.
Scheffler, Jodi A.
Hague, Steve
Wendel, Jonathan F.
Pepper, Alan E.
Frelichowski, James
Lawley, Cindy T.
Jones, Don C.
Percy, Richard G.
Stelly, David M.
author_facet Hinze, Lori L.
Hulse-Kemp, Amanda M.
Wilson, Iain W.
Zhu, Qian-Hao
Llewellyn, Danny J.
Taylor, Jen M.
Spriggs, Andrew
Fang, David D.
Ulloa, Mauricio
Burke, John J.
Giband, Marc
Lacape, Jean-Marc
Van Deynze, Allen
Udall, Joshua A.
Scheffler, Jodi A.
Hague, Steve
Wendel, Jonathan F.
Pepper, Alan E.
Frelichowski, James
Lawley, Cindy T.
Jones, Don C.
Percy, Richard G.
Stelly, David M.
author_sort Hinze, Lori L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cotton germplasm resources contain beneficial alleles that can be exploited to develop germplasm adapted to emerging environmental and climate conditions. Accessions and lines have traditionally been characterized based on phenotypes, but phenotypic profiles are limited by the cost, time, and space required to make visual observations and measurements. With advances in molecular genetic methods, genotypic profiles are increasingly able to identify differences among accessions due to the larger number of genetic markers that can be measured. A combination of both methods would greatly enhance our ability to characterize germplasm resources. Recent efforts have culminated in the identification of sufficient SNP markers to establish high-throughput genotyping systems, such as the CottonSNP63K array, which enables a researcher to efficiently analyze large numbers of SNP markers and obtain highly repeatable results. In the current investigation, we have utilized the SNP array for analyzing genetic diversity primarily among cotton cultivars, making comparisons to SSR-based phylogenetic analyses, and identifying loci associated with seed nutritional traits. RESULTS: The SNP markers distinctly separated G. hirsutum from other Gossypium species and distinguished the wild from cultivated types of G. hirsutum. The markers also efficiently discerned differences among cultivars, which was the primary goal when designing the CottonSNP63K array. Population structure within the genus compared favorably with previous results obtained using SSR markers, and an association study identified loci linked to factors that affect cottonseed protein content. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a large genome-wide variation data set for primarily cultivated cotton. Thousands of SNPs in representative cotton genotypes provide an opportunity to finely discriminate among cultivated cotton from around the world. The SNPs will be relevant as dense markers of genome variation for association mapping approaches aimed at correlating molecular polymorphisms with variation in phenotypic traits, as well as for molecular breeding approaches in cotton. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12870-017-0981-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5291959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52919592017-02-07 Diversity analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm using the CottonSNP63K Array Hinze, Lori L. Hulse-Kemp, Amanda M. Wilson, Iain W. Zhu, Qian-Hao Llewellyn, Danny J. Taylor, Jen M. Spriggs, Andrew Fang, David D. Ulloa, Mauricio Burke, John J. Giband, Marc Lacape, Jean-Marc Van Deynze, Allen Udall, Joshua A. Scheffler, Jodi A. Hague, Steve Wendel, Jonathan F. Pepper, Alan E. Frelichowski, James Lawley, Cindy T. Jones, Don C. Percy, Richard G. Stelly, David M. BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Cotton germplasm resources contain beneficial alleles that can be exploited to develop germplasm adapted to emerging environmental and climate conditions. Accessions and lines have traditionally been characterized based on phenotypes, but phenotypic profiles are limited by the cost, time, and space required to make visual observations and measurements. With advances in molecular genetic methods, genotypic profiles are increasingly able to identify differences among accessions due to the larger number of genetic markers that can be measured. A combination of both methods would greatly enhance our ability to characterize germplasm resources. Recent efforts have culminated in the identification of sufficient SNP markers to establish high-throughput genotyping systems, such as the CottonSNP63K array, which enables a researcher to efficiently analyze large numbers of SNP markers and obtain highly repeatable results. In the current investigation, we have utilized the SNP array for analyzing genetic diversity primarily among cotton cultivars, making comparisons to SSR-based phylogenetic analyses, and identifying loci associated with seed nutritional traits. RESULTS: The SNP markers distinctly separated G. hirsutum from other Gossypium species and distinguished the wild from cultivated types of G. hirsutum. The markers also efficiently discerned differences among cultivars, which was the primary goal when designing the CottonSNP63K array. Population structure within the genus compared favorably with previous results obtained using SSR markers, and an association study identified loci linked to factors that affect cottonseed protein content. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a large genome-wide variation data set for primarily cultivated cotton. Thousands of SNPs in representative cotton genotypes provide an opportunity to finely discriminate among cultivated cotton from around the world. The SNPs will be relevant as dense markers of genome variation for association mapping approaches aimed at correlating molecular polymorphisms with variation in phenotypic traits, as well as for molecular breeding approaches in cotton. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12870-017-0981-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5291959/ /pubmed/28158969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0981-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hinze, Lori L.
Hulse-Kemp, Amanda M.
Wilson, Iain W.
Zhu, Qian-Hao
Llewellyn, Danny J.
Taylor, Jen M.
Spriggs, Andrew
Fang, David D.
Ulloa, Mauricio
Burke, John J.
Giband, Marc
Lacape, Jean-Marc
Van Deynze, Allen
Udall, Joshua A.
Scheffler, Jodi A.
Hague, Steve
Wendel, Jonathan F.
Pepper, Alan E.
Frelichowski, James
Lawley, Cindy T.
Jones, Don C.
Percy, Richard G.
Stelly, David M.
Diversity analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm using the CottonSNP63K Array
title Diversity analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm using the CottonSNP63K Array
title_full Diversity analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm using the CottonSNP63K Array
title_fullStr Diversity analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm using the CottonSNP63K Array
title_full_unstemmed Diversity analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm using the CottonSNP63K Array
title_short Diversity analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) germplasm using the CottonSNP63K Array
title_sort diversity analysis of cotton (gossypium hirsutum l.) germplasm using the cottonsnp63k array
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28158969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0981-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hinzeloril diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT hulsekempamandam diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT wilsoniainw diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT zhuqianhao diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT llewellyndannyj diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT taylorjenm diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT spriggsandrew diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT fangdavidd diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT ulloamauricio diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT burkejohnj diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT gibandmarc diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT lacapejeanmarc diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT vandeynzeallen diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT udalljoshuaa diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT schefflerjodia diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT haguesteve diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT wendeljonathanf diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT pepperalane diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT frelichowskijames diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT lawleycindyt diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT jonesdonc diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT percyrichardg diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray
AT stellydavidm diversityanalysisofcottongossypiumhirsutumlgermplasmusingthecottonsnp63karray