Cargando…
Super-Selective Mesenteric Embolization Provides Effective Control of Lower GI Bleeding
Introduction. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and super-selective mesenteric artery embolization (SMAE) in managing lower GI bleeding (LGIB). Method. A retrospective case series of patients with LGIB treated with SMAE in our health service. Patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1074804 |
_version_ | 1782504877984841728 |
---|---|
author | Pham, Toan Tran, Bob Anh Ooi, Kevin Mykytowycz, Marcus McLaughlin, Stephen Croxford, Matthew Skinner, Iain Faragher, Ian |
author_facet | Pham, Toan Tran, Bob Anh Ooi, Kevin Mykytowycz, Marcus McLaughlin, Stephen Croxford, Matthew Skinner, Iain Faragher, Ian |
author_sort | Pham, Toan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and super-selective mesenteric artery embolization (SMAE) in managing lower GI bleeding (LGIB). Method. A retrospective case series of patients with LGIB treated with SMAE in our health service. Patients with confirmed active LGIB, on either radionuclide scintigraphy (RS) or contrast-enhanced multidetector CT angiography (CE-MDCT), were referred for DSA +/− SMAE. Data collected included patient characteristics, screening modality, bleeding territory, embolization technique, technical and clinical success, short-term to medium-term complications, 30-day mortality, and progression to surgery related to procedural failure or complications. Results. There were fifty-five hospital admissions with acute unstable lower gastrointestinal bleeding which were demonstrable on CE-MDCT or RS over a 31-month period. Eighteen patients proceed to embolization, with immediate success in all. Eight patients (44%) had clinical rebleeding after intervention, warranting repeated imaging. Only one case (5.6%) demonstrated radiological rebleeding and was reembolized. Complication rate was excellent: no bowel ischaemia, ischaemic stricture, progression to surgery, or 30-day mortality. Conclusion. SMAE is a viable, safe, and effective first-line management for localised LGIB. Our results overall compare favourably with the published experiences of other institutions. It is now accepted practice at our institution to manage localised LGIB with embolization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5292126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52921262017-02-16 Super-Selective Mesenteric Embolization Provides Effective Control of Lower GI Bleeding Pham, Toan Tran, Bob Anh Ooi, Kevin Mykytowycz, Marcus McLaughlin, Stephen Croxford, Matthew Skinner, Iain Faragher, Ian Radiol Res Pract Research Article Introduction. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and super-selective mesenteric artery embolization (SMAE) in managing lower GI bleeding (LGIB). Method. A retrospective case series of patients with LGIB treated with SMAE in our health service. Patients with confirmed active LGIB, on either radionuclide scintigraphy (RS) or contrast-enhanced multidetector CT angiography (CE-MDCT), were referred for DSA +/− SMAE. Data collected included patient characteristics, screening modality, bleeding territory, embolization technique, technical and clinical success, short-term to medium-term complications, 30-day mortality, and progression to surgery related to procedural failure or complications. Results. There were fifty-five hospital admissions with acute unstable lower gastrointestinal bleeding which were demonstrable on CE-MDCT or RS over a 31-month period. Eighteen patients proceed to embolization, with immediate success in all. Eight patients (44%) had clinical rebleeding after intervention, warranting repeated imaging. Only one case (5.6%) demonstrated radiological rebleeding and was reembolized. Complication rate was excellent: no bowel ischaemia, ischaemic stricture, progression to surgery, or 30-day mortality. Conclusion. SMAE is a viable, safe, and effective first-line management for localised LGIB. Our results overall compare favourably with the published experiences of other institutions. It is now accepted practice at our institution to manage localised LGIB with embolization. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5292126/ /pubmed/28210507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1074804 Text en Copyright © 2017 Toan Pham et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pham, Toan Tran, Bob Anh Ooi, Kevin Mykytowycz, Marcus McLaughlin, Stephen Croxford, Matthew Skinner, Iain Faragher, Ian Super-Selective Mesenteric Embolization Provides Effective Control of Lower GI Bleeding |
title | Super-Selective Mesenteric Embolization Provides Effective Control of Lower GI Bleeding |
title_full | Super-Selective Mesenteric Embolization Provides Effective Control of Lower GI Bleeding |
title_fullStr | Super-Selective Mesenteric Embolization Provides Effective Control of Lower GI Bleeding |
title_full_unstemmed | Super-Selective Mesenteric Embolization Provides Effective Control of Lower GI Bleeding |
title_short | Super-Selective Mesenteric Embolization Provides Effective Control of Lower GI Bleeding |
title_sort | super-selective mesenteric embolization provides effective control of lower gi bleeding |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1074804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phamtoan superselectivemesentericembolizationprovideseffectivecontroloflowergibleeding AT tranbobanh superselectivemesentericembolizationprovideseffectivecontroloflowergibleeding AT ooikevin superselectivemesentericembolizationprovideseffectivecontroloflowergibleeding AT mykytowyczmarcus superselectivemesentericembolizationprovideseffectivecontroloflowergibleeding AT mclaughlinstephen superselectivemesentericembolizationprovideseffectivecontroloflowergibleeding AT croxfordmatthew superselectivemesentericembolizationprovideseffectivecontroloflowergibleeding AT skinneriain superselectivemesentericembolizationprovideseffectivecontroloflowergibleeding AT faragherian superselectivemesentericembolizationprovideseffectivecontroloflowergibleeding |