Cargando…

Peripheral Visual Reaction Time Is Faster in Deaf Adults and British Sign Language Interpreters than in Hearing Adults

Following auditory deprivation, the remaining sense of vision has shown selective enhancement in visual cognition, especially in the area of near peripheral vision. Visual acuity is poor in the far periphery and may be an area where sound confers the greatest advantage in hearing persons. Experience...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Codina, Charlotte J., Pascalis, Olivier, Baseler, Heidi A., Levine, Alexandra T., Buckley, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28220085
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00050
_version_ 1782504907461361664
author Codina, Charlotte J.
Pascalis, Olivier
Baseler, Heidi A.
Levine, Alexandra T.
Buckley, David
author_facet Codina, Charlotte J.
Pascalis, Olivier
Baseler, Heidi A.
Levine, Alexandra T.
Buckley, David
author_sort Codina, Charlotte J.
collection PubMed
description Following auditory deprivation, the remaining sense of vision has shown selective enhancement in visual cognition, especially in the area of near peripheral vision. Visual acuity is poor in the far periphery and may be an area where sound confers the greatest advantage in hearing persons. Experience with a visuospatial language such as British Sign Language (BSL) makes additional demands on the visual system. To test the different and separable effects of deafness and use of a visuo-spatial language on far peripheral visual processing, we investigated visual reaction times (RTs) and response accuracy to visual stimuli, between 30° and 85° along the four cardinal and four inter-cardinal meridians. We used three luminances of static, briefly illuminated stimuli in visually normal adults. The cohort tested included profoundly congenitally deaf adults (N = 17), hearing fluent BSL users (N = 8) and hearing non-signing adults (N = 18). All participants were tested using a peripheral forced choice paradigm designed previously to test deaf and hearing children (Codina et al., 2011a). Deaf adults demonstrated significantly faster RTs to all far peripheral stimuli and exceeded the abilities of both signing and non-signing hearing adults. Deaf adults were significantly faster than BSL interpreters, who in turn were significantly faster than hearing non-signing adults. The differences in RT demonstrated between groups were consistent across all visual field meridians and were not localized to any one region of the visual field. There were no differences found between any groups in accuracy of detecting these static stimuli at any retinal location. Early onset auditory deprivation appears to lead to a response time visual advantage in far peripheral responses to briefly presented, static LED stimuli, especially in the right visual field. Fluency in BSL facilitates faster visuo-motor responses in the peripheral visual field, but to a lesser extent than congenital, profound deafness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5292361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52923612017-02-20 Peripheral Visual Reaction Time Is Faster in Deaf Adults and British Sign Language Interpreters than in Hearing Adults Codina, Charlotte J. Pascalis, Olivier Baseler, Heidi A. Levine, Alexandra T. Buckley, David Front Psychol Psychology Following auditory deprivation, the remaining sense of vision has shown selective enhancement in visual cognition, especially in the area of near peripheral vision. Visual acuity is poor in the far periphery and may be an area where sound confers the greatest advantage in hearing persons. Experience with a visuospatial language such as British Sign Language (BSL) makes additional demands on the visual system. To test the different and separable effects of deafness and use of a visuo-spatial language on far peripheral visual processing, we investigated visual reaction times (RTs) and response accuracy to visual stimuli, between 30° and 85° along the four cardinal and four inter-cardinal meridians. We used three luminances of static, briefly illuminated stimuli in visually normal adults. The cohort tested included profoundly congenitally deaf adults (N = 17), hearing fluent BSL users (N = 8) and hearing non-signing adults (N = 18). All participants were tested using a peripheral forced choice paradigm designed previously to test deaf and hearing children (Codina et al., 2011a). Deaf adults demonstrated significantly faster RTs to all far peripheral stimuli and exceeded the abilities of both signing and non-signing hearing adults. Deaf adults were significantly faster than BSL interpreters, who in turn were significantly faster than hearing non-signing adults. The differences in RT demonstrated between groups were consistent across all visual field meridians and were not localized to any one region of the visual field. There were no differences found between any groups in accuracy of detecting these static stimuli at any retinal location. Early onset auditory deprivation appears to lead to a response time visual advantage in far peripheral responses to briefly presented, static LED stimuli, especially in the right visual field. Fluency in BSL facilitates faster visuo-motor responses in the peripheral visual field, but to a lesser extent than congenital, profound deafness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5292361/ /pubmed/28220085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00050 Text en Copyright © 2017 Codina, Pascalis, Baseler, Levine and Buckley. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Codina, Charlotte J.
Pascalis, Olivier
Baseler, Heidi A.
Levine, Alexandra T.
Buckley, David
Peripheral Visual Reaction Time Is Faster in Deaf Adults and British Sign Language Interpreters than in Hearing Adults
title Peripheral Visual Reaction Time Is Faster in Deaf Adults and British Sign Language Interpreters than in Hearing Adults
title_full Peripheral Visual Reaction Time Is Faster in Deaf Adults and British Sign Language Interpreters than in Hearing Adults
title_fullStr Peripheral Visual Reaction Time Is Faster in Deaf Adults and British Sign Language Interpreters than in Hearing Adults
title_full_unstemmed Peripheral Visual Reaction Time Is Faster in Deaf Adults and British Sign Language Interpreters than in Hearing Adults
title_short Peripheral Visual Reaction Time Is Faster in Deaf Adults and British Sign Language Interpreters than in Hearing Adults
title_sort peripheral visual reaction time is faster in deaf adults and british sign language interpreters than in hearing adults
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28220085
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00050
work_keys_str_mv AT codinacharlottej peripheralvisualreactiontimeisfasterindeafadultsandbritishsignlanguageinterpretersthaninhearingadults
AT pascalisolivier peripheralvisualreactiontimeisfasterindeafadultsandbritishsignlanguageinterpretersthaninhearingadults
AT baselerheidia peripheralvisualreactiontimeisfasterindeafadultsandbritishsignlanguageinterpretersthaninhearingadults
AT levinealexandrat peripheralvisualreactiontimeisfasterindeafadultsandbritishsignlanguageinterpretersthaninhearingadults
AT buckleydavid peripheralvisualreactiontimeisfasterindeafadultsandbritishsignlanguageinterpretersthaninhearingadults