Cargando…

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Surgical Repair in Inguinal Hernia with Classic versus Preperitoneal Methods on Reduction of Postoperative Complications

Background. This study aims to evaluate and compare the results of inguinal herniorrhaphy with mesh in classic and preperitoneal method. Methods. Our study community includes 150 candidate patients for inguinal herniorrhaphy with mesh. Totally, 150 candidate patients for inguinal herniorrhaphy were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahmoudvand, Hormoz, Forutani, Shahab, Nadri, Sedigheh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28232939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3785302
_version_ 1782504909239746560
author Mahmoudvand, Hormoz
Forutani, Shahab
Nadri, Sedigheh
author_facet Mahmoudvand, Hormoz
Forutani, Shahab
Nadri, Sedigheh
author_sort Mahmoudvand, Hormoz
collection PubMed
description Background. This study aims to evaluate and compare the results of inguinal herniorrhaphy with mesh in classic and preperitoneal method. Methods. Our study community includes 150 candidate patients for inguinal herniorrhaphy with mesh. Totally, 150 candidate patients for inguinal herniorrhaphy were randomly divided into two groups: (1) classic group in which the floor of the canal was repaired and the mesh was located on the floor of the canal and (2) preperitoneal group in which the mesh was installed under the canal and then the floor was repaired. Results. The frequency of recurrence was 10 (13.3%) and 2 (2.66%) in the classic and preperitoneal group, respectively. The frequency of postsurgical pain was 21 (28%) in the classic group and 9 (12%) in the preperitoneal group. The postsurgical hematoma was observed in 7 (9.3%) and 9 (12%) in the classic and preperitoneal group, respectively. Also, the frequency of postsurgical seroma was 8 (10.7%) and 1 (1.3%) in the patients treated with the classic and preperitoneal method, respectively. Conclusion. The findings of the present study demonstrated that the preperitoneal method is a more suitable method for inguinal herniorrhaphy than the classic one because of fewer complications, according to the findings of this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5292369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52923692017-02-23 Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Surgical Repair in Inguinal Hernia with Classic versus Preperitoneal Methods on Reduction of Postoperative Complications Mahmoudvand, Hormoz Forutani, Shahab Nadri, Sedigheh Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Background. This study aims to evaluate and compare the results of inguinal herniorrhaphy with mesh in classic and preperitoneal method. Methods. Our study community includes 150 candidate patients for inguinal herniorrhaphy with mesh. Totally, 150 candidate patients for inguinal herniorrhaphy were randomly divided into two groups: (1) classic group in which the floor of the canal was repaired and the mesh was located on the floor of the canal and (2) preperitoneal group in which the mesh was installed under the canal and then the floor was repaired. Results. The frequency of recurrence was 10 (13.3%) and 2 (2.66%) in the classic and preperitoneal group, respectively. The frequency of postsurgical pain was 21 (28%) in the classic group and 9 (12%) in the preperitoneal group. The postsurgical hematoma was observed in 7 (9.3%) and 9 (12%) in the classic and preperitoneal group, respectively. Also, the frequency of postsurgical seroma was 8 (10.7%) and 1 (1.3%) in the patients treated with the classic and preperitoneal method, respectively. Conclusion. The findings of the present study demonstrated that the preperitoneal method is a more suitable method for inguinal herniorrhaphy than the classic one because of fewer complications, according to the findings of this study. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5292369/ /pubmed/28232939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3785302 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hormoz Mahmoudvand et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Mahmoudvand, Hormoz
Forutani, Shahab
Nadri, Sedigheh
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Surgical Repair in Inguinal Hernia with Classic versus Preperitoneal Methods on Reduction of Postoperative Complications
title Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Surgical Repair in Inguinal Hernia with Classic versus Preperitoneal Methods on Reduction of Postoperative Complications
title_full Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Surgical Repair in Inguinal Hernia with Classic versus Preperitoneal Methods on Reduction of Postoperative Complications
title_fullStr Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Surgical Repair in Inguinal Hernia with Classic versus Preperitoneal Methods on Reduction of Postoperative Complications
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Surgical Repair in Inguinal Hernia with Classic versus Preperitoneal Methods on Reduction of Postoperative Complications
title_short Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Surgical Repair in Inguinal Hernia with Classic versus Preperitoneal Methods on Reduction of Postoperative Complications
title_sort comparison of treatment outcomes of surgical repair in inguinal hernia with classic versus preperitoneal methods on reduction of postoperative complications
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28232939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3785302
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudvandhormoz comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesofsurgicalrepairininguinalherniawithclassicversuspreperitonealmethodsonreductionofpostoperativecomplications
AT forutanishahab comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesofsurgicalrepairininguinalherniawithclassicversuspreperitonealmethodsonreductionofpostoperativecomplications
AT nadrisedigheh comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesofsurgicalrepairininguinalherniawithclassicversuspreperitonealmethodsonreductionofpostoperativecomplications