Cargando…

Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact

BACKGROUND: Research positions embedded within healthcare settings have been identified as an enabler to allied health professional (AHP) research capacity; however, there is currently limited research formally evaluating their impact. In 2008, a Health Practitioner industrial agreement funded a res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wenke, Rachel J., Ward, Elizabeth C., Hickman, Ingrid, Hulcombe, Julie, Phillips, Rachel, Mickan, Sharon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28166817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4
_version_ 1782504990189813760
author Wenke, Rachel J.
Ward, Elizabeth C.
Hickman, Ingrid
Hulcombe, Julie
Phillips, Rachel
Mickan, Sharon
author_facet Wenke, Rachel J.
Ward, Elizabeth C.
Hickman, Ingrid
Hulcombe, Julie
Phillips, Rachel
Mickan, Sharon
author_sort Wenke, Rachel J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research positions embedded within healthcare settings have been identified as an enabler to allied health professional (AHP) research capacity; however, there is currently limited research formally evaluating their impact. In 2008, a Health Practitioner industrial agreement funded a research capacity building initiative within Queensland Health, Australia, which included 15 new allied health research positions. The present project used a qualitative and realist approach to explore the impact of these research positions, as well as the mechanisms which facilitated or hindered their success within their respective organisations. METHODS: Forty-four AHP employees from six governmental health services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study. Individual interviews were undertaken, with individuals in research positions (n = 8) and their reporting line managers (n = 8). Four stakeholder focus groups were also conducted with clinicians, team leaders and professional heads who had engaged with the research positions. RESULTS: Nine key outcomes of the research positions were identified across individual, team/service and organisational/community levels. These outcomes included clinician skill development, increased research activity, clinical and service changes, increased research outputs and collaborations, enhanced research and workplace culture, improved profile of allied health, development of research infrastructure, and professional development of individuals in the research positions. Different mechanisms that influenced these outcomes were identified. These mechanisms were grouped by those related to the (1) research position itself, (2) organisational factors and (3) implementation factors. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings highlight the potential value of the research positions for individuals, teams and clinical services across different governmental healthcare services, and demonstrate the impact of the roles on building the internal and external profile of allied health. Results build upon the emerging evidence base for allied health research positions and have important implications for a number of stakeholders (i.e. individuals in the research positions, AHPs and their managers, university partners and state-wide executives). Key recommendations are provided for all stakeholders to enhance the ongoing impact of these roles and the potential advocacy for additional positions and resources to support them. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5292788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52927882017-02-10 Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact Wenke, Rachel J. Ward, Elizabeth C. Hickman, Ingrid Hulcombe, Julie Phillips, Rachel Mickan, Sharon Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Research positions embedded within healthcare settings have been identified as an enabler to allied health professional (AHP) research capacity; however, there is currently limited research formally evaluating their impact. In 2008, a Health Practitioner industrial agreement funded a research capacity building initiative within Queensland Health, Australia, which included 15 new allied health research positions. The present project used a qualitative and realist approach to explore the impact of these research positions, as well as the mechanisms which facilitated or hindered their success within their respective organisations. METHODS: Forty-four AHP employees from six governmental health services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study. Individual interviews were undertaken, with individuals in research positions (n = 8) and their reporting line managers (n = 8). Four stakeholder focus groups were also conducted with clinicians, team leaders and professional heads who had engaged with the research positions. RESULTS: Nine key outcomes of the research positions were identified across individual, team/service and organisational/community levels. These outcomes included clinician skill development, increased research activity, clinical and service changes, increased research outputs and collaborations, enhanced research and workplace culture, improved profile of allied health, development of research infrastructure, and professional development of individuals in the research positions. Different mechanisms that influenced these outcomes were identified. These mechanisms were grouped by those related to the (1) research position itself, (2) organisational factors and (3) implementation factors. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings highlight the potential value of the research positions for individuals, teams and clinical services across different governmental healthcare services, and demonstrate the impact of the roles on building the internal and external profile of allied health. Results build upon the emerging evidence base for allied health research positions and have important implications for a number of stakeholders (i.e. individuals in the research positions, AHPs and their managers, university partners and state-wide executives). Key recommendations are provided for all stakeholders to enhance the ongoing impact of these roles and the potential advocacy for additional positions and resources to support them. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5292788/ /pubmed/28166817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wenke, Rachel J.
Ward, Elizabeth C.
Hickman, Ingrid
Hulcombe, Julie
Phillips, Rachel
Mickan, Sharon
Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact
title Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact
title_full Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact
title_fullStr Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact
title_full_unstemmed Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact
title_short Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact
title_sort allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28166817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wenkerachelj alliedhealthresearchpositionsaqualitativeevaluationoftheirimpact
AT wardelizabethc alliedhealthresearchpositionsaqualitativeevaluationoftheirimpact
AT hickmaningrid alliedhealthresearchpositionsaqualitativeevaluationoftheirimpact
AT hulcombejulie alliedhealthresearchpositionsaqualitativeevaluationoftheirimpact
AT phillipsrachel alliedhealthresearchpositionsaqualitativeevaluationoftheirimpact
AT mickansharon alliedhealthresearchpositionsaqualitativeevaluationoftheirimpact