Cargando…
Tissue type determination by impedance measurement: A bipolar and monopolar comparison
BACKGROUND: In certain medical applications, it is necessary to be able to determine the position of a needle inside the body, specifically with regards to identifying certain tissue types. By measuring the electrical impedance of specific tissue types, it is possible to determine the type of tissue...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217047 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.197334 |
_version_ | 1782505001163161600 |
---|---|
author | Sharp, Jack Bouazza-Marouf, Kaddour Noronha, Dorita Gaur, Atul |
author_facet | Sharp, Jack Bouazza-Marouf, Kaddour Noronha, Dorita Gaur, Atul |
author_sort | Sharp, Jack |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In certain medical applications, it is necessary to be able to determine the position of a needle inside the body, specifically with regards to identifying certain tissue types. By measuring the electrical impedance of specific tissue types, it is possible to determine the type of tissue the tip of the needle (or probe) is at. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two methods have been investigated for electric impedance detection; bipolar and monopolar. Commercially available needle electrodes are of a monopolar type. Although many patents exist on the bipolar setups, these have not as yet been commercialized. This paper reports a comparison of monopolar and bipolar setups for tissue type determination. In vitro experiments were carried out on pork to compare this investigation with other investigations in this field. RESULTS: The results show that both monopolar and bipolar setups are capable of determining tissue type. However, the bipolar setup showed slightly better results; the difference between the different soft tissue type impedances was greater compared to the monopolar method. CONCLUSION: Both monopolar and bipolar electrical impedance setups work very similarly in inhomogeneous volumes such as biological tissue. There is a clear potential for clinical applications with impedance-based needle guidance, with both the monopolar and bipolar setups. It is, however, worth noting that the bipolar setup is more versatile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5292845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52928452017-02-17 Tissue type determination by impedance measurement: A bipolar and monopolar comparison Sharp, Jack Bouazza-Marouf, Kaddour Noronha, Dorita Gaur, Atul Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: In certain medical applications, it is necessary to be able to determine the position of a needle inside the body, specifically with regards to identifying certain tissue types. By measuring the electrical impedance of specific tissue types, it is possible to determine the type of tissue the tip of the needle (or probe) is at. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two methods have been investigated for electric impedance detection; bipolar and monopolar. Commercially available needle electrodes are of a monopolar type. Although many patents exist on the bipolar setups, these have not as yet been commercialized. This paper reports a comparison of monopolar and bipolar setups for tissue type determination. In vitro experiments were carried out on pork to compare this investigation with other investigations in this field. RESULTS: The results show that both monopolar and bipolar setups are capable of determining tissue type. However, the bipolar setup showed slightly better results; the difference between the different soft tissue type impedances was greater compared to the monopolar method. CONCLUSION: Both monopolar and bipolar electrical impedance setups work very similarly in inhomogeneous volumes such as biological tissue. There is a clear potential for clinical applications with impedance-based needle guidance, with both the monopolar and bipolar setups. It is, however, worth noting that the bipolar setup is more versatile. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5292845/ /pubmed/28217047 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.197334 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Saudi Journal of Anesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharp, Jack Bouazza-Marouf, Kaddour Noronha, Dorita Gaur, Atul Tissue type determination by impedance measurement: A bipolar and monopolar comparison |
title | Tissue type determination by impedance measurement: A bipolar and monopolar comparison |
title_full | Tissue type determination by impedance measurement: A bipolar and monopolar comparison |
title_fullStr | Tissue type determination by impedance measurement: A bipolar and monopolar comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Tissue type determination by impedance measurement: A bipolar and monopolar comparison |
title_short | Tissue type determination by impedance measurement: A bipolar and monopolar comparison |
title_sort | tissue type determination by impedance measurement: a bipolar and monopolar comparison |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217047 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.197334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharpjack tissuetypedeterminationbyimpedancemeasurementabipolarandmonopolarcomparison AT bouazzamaroufkaddour tissuetypedeterminationbyimpedancemeasurementabipolarandmonopolarcomparison AT noronhadorita tissuetypedeterminationbyimpedancemeasurementabipolarandmonopolarcomparison AT gauratul tissuetypedeterminationbyimpedancemeasurementabipolarandmonopolarcomparison |