Cargando…

A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Background and study aims Medical error occurs frequently with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aime to assess the frequency and type of endoscopy patient safety incidents (PSIs). Patients and methods A prospective observational study of PSIs in routine diagnostic and therapeutic endo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matharoo, Manmeet, Haycock, Adam, Sevdalis, Nick, Thomas-Gibson, Siwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-117219
_version_ 1782505006492024832
author Matharoo, Manmeet
Haycock, Adam
Sevdalis, Nick
Thomas-Gibson, Siwan
author_facet Matharoo, Manmeet
Haycock, Adam
Sevdalis, Nick
Thomas-Gibson, Siwan
author_sort Matharoo, Manmeet
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims Medical error occurs frequently with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aime to assess the frequency and type of endoscopy patient safety incidents (PSIs). Patients and methods A prospective observational study of PSIs in routine diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy was undertaken in a secondary and tertiary care center. Observations were undertaken within the endoscopy suite across pre-procedure, intra-procedure and post-procedure phases of care. Experienced (Consultant-level) and trainee endoscopists from medical, surgical, and nursing specialities were included. PSIs were defined as any safety issue that had the potential to or directly adversely affected patient care: PSIs included near misses, complications, adverse events and “never events”. PSIs were reviewed by an expert panel and categorized for severity and nature via expert consensus. Results One hundred and forty procedures (92 diagnostic, 48 therapeutic) over 37 lists (experienced operators n = 25, trainees n = 12) were analyzed. One hundred forty PSIs were identified (median 1 per procedure, range 0 – 7). Eighty-six PSIs (61 %) occurred in 48 therapeutic procedures. Zero PSIs were detected in 13 diagnostic procedures. 21 (15 %) PSIs were categorized as severe and 12 (9 %) had the potential to be “never events,” including patient misidentification and wrong procedure. Forty PSIs (28 %) were of intermediate severity and 78 (56 %) were minor. Oxygen monitoring PSIs occurred most frequently. Conclusion This is the first study documenting the range and frequency of PSIs in endoscopy. Although many errors are minor without immediate consequence, further work should identify whether prevention of such recurrent errors affects the incidence of severe errors, thus improving safety and quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5292877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52928772017-02-10 A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy Matharoo, Manmeet Haycock, Adam Sevdalis, Nick Thomas-Gibson, Siwan Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Medical error occurs frequently with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aime to assess the frequency and type of endoscopy patient safety incidents (PSIs). Patients and methods A prospective observational study of PSIs in routine diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy was undertaken in a secondary and tertiary care center. Observations were undertaken within the endoscopy suite across pre-procedure, intra-procedure and post-procedure phases of care. Experienced (Consultant-level) and trainee endoscopists from medical, surgical, and nursing specialities were included. PSIs were defined as any safety issue that had the potential to or directly adversely affected patient care: PSIs included near misses, complications, adverse events and “never events”. PSIs were reviewed by an expert panel and categorized for severity and nature via expert consensus. Results One hundred and forty procedures (92 diagnostic, 48 therapeutic) over 37 lists (experienced operators n = 25, trainees n = 12) were analyzed. One hundred forty PSIs were identified (median 1 per procedure, range 0 – 7). Eighty-six PSIs (61 %) occurred in 48 therapeutic procedures. Zero PSIs were detected in 13 diagnostic procedures. 21 (15 %) PSIs were categorized as severe and 12 (9 %) had the potential to be “never events,” including patient misidentification and wrong procedure. Forty PSIs (28 %) were of intermediate severity and 78 (56 %) were minor. Oxygen monitoring PSIs occurred most frequently. Conclusion This is the first study documenting the range and frequency of PSIs in endoscopy. Although many errors are minor without immediate consequence, further work should identify whether prevention of such recurrent errors affects the incidence of severe errors, thus improving safety and quality. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-01 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5292877/ /pubmed/28191498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-117219 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Matharoo, Manmeet
Haycock, Adam
Sevdalis, Nick
Thomas-Gibson, Siwan
A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy
title A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_fullStr A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full_unstemmed A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_short A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_sort prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-117219
work_keys_str_mv AT matharoomanmeet aprospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy
AT haycockadam aprospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy
AT sevdalisnick aprospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy
AT thomasgibsonsiwan aprospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy
AT matharoomanmeet prospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy
AT haycockadam prospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy
AT sevdalisnick prospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy
AT thomasgibsonsiwan prospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy