Cargando…
A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Background and study aims Medical error occurs frequently with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aime to assess the frequency and type of endoscopy patient safety incidents (PSIs). Patients and methods A prospective observational study of PSIs in routine diagnostic and therapeutic endo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-117219 |
_version_ | 1782505006492024832 |
---|---|
author | Matharoo, Manmeet Haycock, Adam Sevdalis, Nick Thomas-Gibson, Siwan |
author_facet | Matharoo, Manmeet Haycock, Adam Sevdalis, Nick Thomas-Gibson, Siwan |
author_sort | Matharoo, Manmeet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Medical error occurs frequently with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aime to assess the frequency and type of endoscopy patient safety incidents (PSIs). Patients and methods A prospective observational study of PSIs in routine diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy was undertaken in a secondary and tertiary care center. Observations were undertaken within the endoscopy suite across pre-procedure, intra-procedure and post-procedure phases of care. Experienced (Consultant-level) and trainee endoscopists from medical, surgical, and nursing specialities were included. PSIs were defined as any safety issue that had the potential to or directly adversely affected patient care: PSIs included near misses, complications, adverse events and “never events”. PSIs were reviewed by an expert panel and categorized for severity and nature via expert consensus. Results One hundred and forty procedures (92 diagnostic, 48 therapeutic) over 37 lists (experienced operators n = 25, trainees n = 12) were analyzed. One hundred forty PSIs were identified (median 1 per procedure, range 0 – 7). Eighty-six PSIs (61 %) occurred in 48 therapeutic procedures. Zero PSIs were detected in 13 diagnostic procedures. 21 (15 %) PSIs were categorized as severe and 12 (9 %) had the potential to be “never events,” including patient misidentification and wrong procedure. Forty PSIs (28 %) were of intermediate severity and 78 (56 %) were minor. Oxygen monitoring PSIs occurred most frequently. Conclusion This is the first study documenting the range and frequency of PSIs in endoscopy. Although many errors are minor without immediate consequence, further work should identify whether prevention of such recurrent errors affects the incidence of severe errors, thus improving safety and quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5292877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52928772017-02-10 A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy Matharoo, Manmeet Haycock, Adam Sevdalis, Nick Thomas-Gibson, Siwan Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Medical error occurs frequently with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aime to assess the frequency and type of endoscopy patient safety incidents (PSIs). Patients and methods A prospective observational study of PSIs in routine diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy was undertaken in a secondary and tertiary care center. Observations were undertaken within the endoscopy suite across pre-procedure, intra-procedure and post-procedure phases of care. Experienced (Consultant-level) and trainee endoscopists from medical, surgical, and nursing specialities were included. PSIs were defined as any safety issue that had the potential to or directly adversely affected patient care: PSIs included near misses, complications, adverse events and “never events”. PSIs were reviewed by an expert panel and categorized for severity and nature via expert consensus. Results One hundred and forty procedures (92 diagnostic, 48 therapeutic) over 37 lists (experienced operators n = 25, trainees n = 12) were analyzed. One hundred forty PSIs were identified (median 1 per procedure, range 0 – 7). Eighty-six PSIs (61 %) occurred in 48 therapeutic procedures. Zero PSIs were detected in 13 diagnostic procedures. 21 (15 %) PSIs were categorized as severe and 12 (9 %) had the potential to be “never events,” including patient misidentification and wrong procedure. Forty PSIs (28 %) were of intermediate severity and 78 (56 %) were minor. Oxygen monitoring PSIs occurred most frequently. Conclusion This is the first study documenting the range and frequency of PSIs in endoscopy. Although many errors are minor without immediate consequence, further work should identify whether prevention of such recurrent errors affects the incidence of severe errors, thus improving safety and quality. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-01 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5292877/ /pubmed/28191498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-117219 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Matharoo, Manmeet Haycock, Adam Sevdalis, Nick Thomas-Gibson, Siwan A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title | A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_full | A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_fullStr | A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_short | A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy |
title_sort | prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-117219 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matharoomanmeet aprospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy AT haycockadam aprospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy AT sevdalisnick aprospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy AT thomasgibsonsiwan aprospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy AT matharoomanmeet prospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy AT haycockadam prospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy AT sevdalisnick prospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy AT thomasgibsonsiwan prospectivestudyofpatientsafetyincidentsingastrointestinalendoscopy |