Cargando…
Weight-based contrast administration in the computerized tomography evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism: Challenges in optimizing imaging quality
Compare individualized contrast protocol, or weight-based protocol, to standard methodology in evaluating acute pulmonary embolism. Retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing computed tomography angiography with standard contrast protocol (n = 50) or individualized protocol (n =...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5293450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28151887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005972 |
_version_ | 1782505084268052480 |
---|---|
author | Laurent, Lisa Zamfirova, Ina Sulo, Suela Baral, Pesach |
author_facet | Laurent, Lisa Zamfirova, Ina Sulo, Suela Baral, Pesach |
author_sort | Laurent, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Compare individualized contrast protocol, or weight-based protocol, to standard methodology in evaluating acute pulmonary embolism. Retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing computed tomography angiography with standard contrast protocol (n = 50) or individualized protocol (n = 50). Computerized tomography images were assessed for vascular enhancement and image quality. Demographics were comparable, however, more patients in the individualized group were admitted to intensive care unit (48% vs 16%, P = 0.004). Vascular enhancement and image quality were also comparable, although individualized protocol had significantly fewer contrast and motion artifact limitations (28% vs 48%, P = 0.039). Fifteen percent decrease in intravenous contrast volume was identified in individualized group with no compromise in image quality. Individualized contrast protocol provided comparable vascular enhancement and image quality to the standard, yet with fewer limitations and lower intravenous contrast volume. Catheter-gauge flow rate restrictions resulting in inconsistent technologist exam execution were identified, supporting the need for further investigation of this regimen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5293450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52934502017-02-10 Weight-based contrast administration in the computerized tomography evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism: Challenges in optimizing imaging quality Laurent, Lisa Zamfirova, Ina Sulo, Suela Baral, Pesach Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 Compare individualized contrast protocol, or weight-based protocol, to standard methodology in evaluating acute pulmonary embolism. Retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing computed tomography angiography with standard contrast protocol (n = 50) or individualized protocol (n = 50). Computerized tomography images were assessed for vascular enhancement and image quality. Demographics were comparable, however, more patients in the individualized group were admitted to intensive care unit (48% vs 16%, P = 0.004). Vascular enhancement and image quality were also comparable, although individualized protocol had significantly fewer contrast and motion artifact limitations (28% vs 48%, P = 0.039). Fifteen percent decrease in intravenous contrast volume was identified in individualized group with no compromise in image quality. Individualized contrast protocol provided comparable vascular enhancement and image quality to the standard, yet with fewer limitations and lower intravenous contrast volume. Catheter-gauge flow rate restrictions resulting in inconsistent technologist exam execution were identified, supporting the need for further investigation of this regimen. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5293450/ /pubmed/28151887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005972 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 6800 Laurent, Lisa Zamfirova, Ina Sulo, Suela Baral, Pesach Weight-based contrast administration in the computerized tomography evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism: Challenges in optimizing imaging quality |
title | Weight-based contrast administration in the computerized tomography evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism: Challenges in optimizing imaging quality |
title_full | Weight-based contrast administration in the computerized tomography evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism: Challenges in optimizing imaging quality |
title_fullStr | Weight-based contrast administration in the computerized tomography evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism: Challenges in optimizing imaging quality |
title_full_unstemmed | Weight-based contrast administration in the computerized tomography evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism: Challenges in optimizing imaging quality |
title_short | Weight-based contrast administration in the computerized tomography evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism: Challenges in optimizing imaging quality |
title_sort | weight-based contrast administration in the computerized tomography evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism: challenges in optimizing imaging quality |
topic | 6800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5293450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28151887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005972 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laurentlisa weightbasedcontrastadministrationinthecomputerizedtomographyevaluationofacutepulmonaryembolismchallengesinoptimizingimagingquality AT zamfirovaina weightbasedcontrastadministrationinthecomputerizedtomographyevaluationofacutepulmonaryembolismchallengesinoptimizingimagingquality AT sulosuela weightbasedcontrastadministrationinthecomputerizedtomographyevaluationofacutepulmonaryembolismchallengesinoptimizingimagingquality AT baralpesach weightbasedcontrastadministrationinthecomputerizedtomographyevaluationofacutepulmonaryembolismchallengesinoptimizingimagingquality |