Cargando…

Validation of a risk stratification tool for fall-related injury in a state-wide cohort

OBJECTIVE: A major preventable contributor to healthcare costs among older individuals is fall-related injury. We sought to validate a tool to stratify such risk based on readily available clinical data, including projected medication adverse effects, using state-wide medical claims data. DESIGN: So...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCoy, Thomas H, Castro, Victor M, Cagan, Andrew, Roberson, Ashlee M, Perlis, Roy H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5293982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28167743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012189
_version_ 1782505162441490432
author McCoy, Thomas H
Castro, Victor M
Cagan, Andrew
Roberson, Ashlee M
Perlis, Roy H
author_facet McCoy, Thomas H
Castro, Victor M
Cagan, Andrew
Roberson, Ashlee M
Perlis, Roy H
author_sort McCoy, Thomas H
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A major preventable contributor to healthcare costs among older individuals is fall-related injury. We sought to validate a tool to stratify such risk based on readily available clinical data, including projected medication adverse effects, using state-wide medical claims data. DESIGN: Sociodemographic and clinical features were drawn from health claims paid in the state of Massachusetts for individuals aged 35–65 with a hospital admission for a period spanning January–December 2012. Previously developed logistic regression models of hospital readmission for fall-related injury were refit in a testing set including a randomly selected 70% of individuals, and examined in a training set comprised of the remaining 30%. Medications at admission were summarised based on reported adverse effect frequencies in published medication labelling. SETTING: The Massachusetts health system. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 68 764 hospitalised individuals aged 35–65 years. PRIMARY MEASURES: Hospital readmission for fall-related injury defined by claims code. RESULTS: A total of 2052 individuals (3.0%) were hospitalised for fall-related injury within 90 days of discharge, and 3391 (4.9%) within 180 days. After recalibrating the model in a training data set comprised of 48 136 individuals (70%), model discrimination in the remaining 30% test set yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.74 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.76). AUCs were similar across age decades (0.71 to 0.78) and sex (0.72 male, 0.76 female), and across most common diagnostic categories other than psychiatry. For individuals in the highest risk quartile, 11.4% experienced fall within 180 days versus 1.2% in the lowest risk quartile; 57.6% of falls occurred in the highest risk quartile. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of state-wide claims data demonstrates the feasibility of predicting fall-related injury requiring hospitalisation using readily available sociodemographic and clinical details. This translatable approach to stratification allows for identification of high-risk individuals in whom interventions are likely to be cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5293982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52939822017-02-27 Validation of a risk stratification tool for fall-related injury in a state-wide cohort McCoy, Thomas H Castro, Victor M Cagan, Andrew Roberson, Ashlee M Perlis, Roy H BMJ Open Health Informatics OBJECTIVE: A major preventable contributor to healthcare costs among older individuals is fall-related injury. We sought to validate a tool to stratify such risk based on readily available clinical data, including projected medication adverse effects, using state-wide medical claims data. DESIGN: Sociodemographic and clinical features were drawn from health claims paid in the state of Massachusetts for individuals aged 35–65 with a hospital admission for a period spanning January–December 2012. Previously developed logistic regression models of hospital readmission for fall-related injury were refit in a testing set including a randomly selected 70% of individuals, and examined in a training set comprised of the remaining 30%. Medications at admission were summarised based on reported adverse effect frequencies in published medication labelling. SETTING: The Massachusetts health system. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 68 764 hospitalised individuals aged 35–65 years. PRIMARY MEASURES: Hospital readmission for fall-related injury defined by claims code. RESULTS: A total of 2052 individuals (3.0%) were hospitalised for fall-related injury within 90 days of discharge, and 3391 (4.9%) within 180 days. After recalibrating the model in a training data set comprised of 48 136 individuals (70%), model discrimination in the remaining 30% test set yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.74 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.76). AUCs were similar across age decades (0.71 to 0.78) and sex (0.72 male, 0.76 female), and across most common diagnostic categories other than psychiatry. For individuals in the highest risk quartile, 11.4% experienced fall within 180 days versus 1.2% in the lowest risk quartile; 57.6% of falls occurred in the highest risk quartile. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of state-wide claims data demonstrates the feasibility of predicting fall-related injury requiring hospitalisation using readily available sociodemographic and clinical details. This translatable approach to stratification allows for identification of high-risk individuals in whom interventions are likely to be cost-effective. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5293982/ /pubmed/28167743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012189 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Informatics
McCoy, Thomas H
Castro, Victor M
Cagan, Andrew
Roberson, Ashlee M
Perlis, Roy H
Validation of a risk stratification tool for fall-related injury in a state-wide cohort
title Validation of a risk stratification tool for fall-related injury in a state-wide cohort
title_full Validation of a risk stratification tool for fall-related injury in a state-wide cohort
title_fullStr Validation of a risk stratification tool for fall-related injury in a state-wide cohort
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a risk stratification tool for fall-related injury in a state-wide cohort
title_short Validation of a risk stratification tool for fall-related injury in a state-wide cohort
title_sort validation of a risk stratification tool for fall-related injury in a state-wide cohort
topic Health Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5293982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28167743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012189
work_keys_str_mv AT mccoythomash validationofariskstratificationtoolforfallrelatedinjuryinastatewidecohort
AT castrovictorm validationofariskstratificationtoolforfallrelatedinjuryinastatewidecohort
AT caganandrew validationofariskstratificationtoolforfallrelatedinjuryinastatewidecohort
AT robersonashleem validationofariskstratificationtoolforfallrelatedinjuryinastatewidecohort
AT perlisroyh validationofariskstratificationtoolforfallrelatedinjuryinastatewidecohort