Cargando…
Single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment: systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
OBJECTIVES: Single-visit root canal treatment has some advantages over conventional multivisit treatment, but might increase the risk of complications. We systematically evaluated the risk of complications after single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment using meta-analysis and trial-sequen...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5293988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28148534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013115 |
_version_ | 1782505163129356288 |
---|---|
author | Schwendicke, Falk Göstemeyer, Gerd |
author_facet | Schwendicke, Falk Göstemeyer, Gerd |
author_sort | Schwendicke, Falk |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Single-visit root canal treatment has some advantages over conventional multivisit treatment, but might increase the risk of complications. We systematically evaluated the risk of complications after single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment using meta-analysis and trial-sequential analysis. DATA: Controlled trials comparing single-visit versus multiple-visit root canal treatment of permanent teeth were included. Trials needed to assess the risk of long-term complications (pain, infection, new/persisting/increasing periapical lesions ≥1 year after treatment), short-term pain or flare-up (acute exacerbation of initiation or continuation of root canal treatment). SOURCES: Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central) were screened, random-effects meta-analyses performed and trial-sequential analysis used to control for risk of random errors. Evidence was graded according to GRADE. STUDY SELECTION: 29 trials (4341 patients) were included, all but 6 showing high risk of bias. Based on 10 trials (1257 teeth), risk of complications was not significantly different in single-visit versus multiple-visit treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.00 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.35); weak evidence). Based on 20 studies (3008 teeth), risk of pain did not significantly differ between treatments (RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.30); moderate evidence). Risk of flare-up was recorded by 8 studies (1110 teeth) and was significantly higher after single-visit versus multiple-visit treatment (RR 2.13 (95% CI 1.16 to 3.89); very weak evidence). Trial-sequential analysis revealed that firm evidence for benefit, harm or futility was not reached for any of the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to rule out whether important differences between both strategies exist. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dentists can provide root canal treatment in 1 or multiple visits. Given the possibly increased risk of flare-ups, multiple-visit treatment might be preferred for certain teeth (eg, those with periapical lesions). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5293988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52939882017-02-27 Single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment: systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Schwendicke, Falk Göstemeyer, Gerd BMJ Open Dentistry and Oral Medicine OBJECTIVES: Single-visit root canal treatment has some advantages over conventional multivisit treatment, but might increase the risk of complications. We systematically evaluated the risk of complications after single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment using meta-analysis and trial-sequential analysis. DATA: Controlled trials comparing single-visit versus multiple-visit root canal treatment of permanent teeth were included. Trials needed to assess the risk of long-term complications (pain, infection, new/persisting/increasing periapical lesions ≥1 year after treatment), short-term pain or flare-up (acute exacerbation of initiation or continuation of root canal treatment). SOURCES: Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central) were screened, random-effects meta-analyses performed and trial-sequential analysis used to control for risk of random errors. Evidence was graded according to GRADE. STUDY SELECTION: 29 trials (4341 patients) were included, all but 6 showing high risk of bias. Based on 10 trials (1257 teeth), risk of complications was not significantly different in single-visit versus multiple-visit treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.00 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.35); weak evidence). Based on 20 studies (3008 teeth), risk of pain did not significantly differ between treatments (RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.30); moderate evidence). Risk of flare-up was recorded by 8 studies (1110 teeth) and was significantly higher after single-visit versus multiple-visit treatment (RR 2.13 (95% CI 1.16 to 3.89); very weak evidence). Trial-sequential analysis revealed that firm evidence for benefit, harm or futility was not reached for any of the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to rule out whether important differences between both strategies exist. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dentists can provide root canal treatment in 1 or multiple visits. Given the possibly increased risk of flare-ups, multiple-visit treatment might be preferred for certain teeth (eg, those with periapical lesions). BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5293988/ /pubmed/28148534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013115 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Dentistry and Oral Medicine Schwendicke, Falk Göstemeyer, Gerd Single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment: systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title | Single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment: systematic review,
meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_full | Single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment: systematic review,
meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_fullStr | Single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment: systematic review,
meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment: systematic review,
meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_short | Single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment: systematic review,
meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
title_sort | single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment: systematic review,
meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis |
topic | Dentistry and Oral Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5293988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28148534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwendickefalk singlevisitormultiplevisitrootcanaltreatmentsystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis AT gostemeyergerd singlevisitormultiplevisitrootcanaltreatmentsystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis |