Cargando…
Cognitive Structure of Writing Disorders in Russian: What Would Luria Say?
Acquired disorders of writing in the Russian language have been reported for more than a century. The study of these disorders reflects the history of Russian neuropsychology and is dominated by the syndrome approach most notably by the writings of Luria. Indeed, our understanding of acquired dysgra...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22713406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BEN-2012-119010 |
_version_ | 1782505204018577408 |
---|---|
author | Kozintseva, Elena Skvortsov, Anatoly Ulicheva, Anastasia Vlasova (Zaykova), Anna |
author_facet | Kozintseva, Elena Skvortsov, Anatoly Ulicheva, Anastasia Vlasova (Zaykova), Anna |
author_sort | Kozintseva, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acquired disorders of writing in the Russian language have been reported for more than a century. The study of these disorders reflects the history of Russian neuropsychology and is dominated by the syndrome approach most notably by the writings of Luria. Indeed, our understanding of acquired dysgraphia in Russian speakers is conceptualized according to the classical approach in Modern Russia. In this review, we describe the classical approach and compare it to the cognitive neuropsychological models of writing disorders that are developed to explain dysgraphia in English and in other Western European languages. We argue that the basic theoretical assumptions of the two approaches – cognitive and classical or syndrome approach – share similarities. It is therefore proposed that identification of acquired cases of dysgraphia in Russian could potentially benefit from taking the cognitive neuropsychological perspective. We also conclude that adopting elements of the syndrome approach would substantially enrich the understanding of acquired dysgraphia since these offer an insight into processes not described in the cognitive neuropsychological approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5294242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52942422017-04-02 Cognitive Structure of Writing Disorders in Russian: What Would Luria Say? Kozintseva, Elena Skvortsov, Anatoly Ulicheva, Anastasia Vlasova (Zaykova), Anna Behav Neurol Other Acquired disorders of writing in the Russian language have been reported for more than a century. The study of these disorders reflects the history of Russian neuropsychology and is dominated by the syndrome approach most notably by the writings of Luria. Indeed, our understanding of acquired dysgraphia in Russian speakers is conceptualized according to the classical approach in Modern Russia. In this review, we describe the classical approach and compare it to the cognitive neuropsychological models of writing disorders that are developed to explain dysgraphia in English and in other Western European languages. We argue that the basic theoretical assumptions of the two approaches – cognitive and classical or syndrome approach – share similarities. It is therefore proposed that identification of acquired cases of dysgraphia in Russian could potentially benefit from taking the cognitive neuropsychological perspective. We also conclude that adopting elements of the syndrome approach would substantially enrich the understanding of acquired dysgraphia since these offer an insight into processes not described in the cognitive neuropsychological approach. IOS Press 2012 2012-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5294242/ /pubmed/22713406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BEN-2012-119010 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hindawi Publishing Corporation and the authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Other Kozintseva, Elena Skvortsov, Anatoly Ulicheva, Anastasia Vlasova (Zaykova), Anna Cognitive Structure of Writing Disorders in Russian: What Would Luria Say? |
title | Cognitive Structure of Writing Disorders in Russian: What Would Luria Say? |
title_full | Cognitive Structure of Writing Disorders in Russian: What Would Luria Say? |
title_fullStr | Cognitive Structure of Writing Disorders in Russian: What Would Luria Say? |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive Structure of Writing Disorders in Russian: What Would Luria Say? |
title_short | Cognitive Structure of Writing Disorders in Russian: What Would Luria Say? |
title_sort | cognitive structure of writing disorders in russian: what would luria say? |
topic | Other |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22713406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BEN-2012-119010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kozintsevaelena cognitivestructureofwritingdisordersinrussianwhatwouldluriasay AT skvortsovanatoly cognitivestructureofwritingdisordersinrussianwhatwouldluriasay AT ulichevaanastasia cognitivestructureofwritingdisordersinrussianwhatwouldluriasay AT vlasovazaykovaanna cognitivestructureofwritingdisordersinrussianwhatwouldluriasay |