Cargando…

An Assessment of the Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Ametropic and Anisometropic Amblyopia in Achieving the Corrected Visual Acuity of 1.0

Both visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) are important parameters for measuring visual function. In this research, we investigated the CS of patients with ametropic or anisometropic amblyopia, whose corrected visual acuity (CVA) recovered to 1.0. Fifty-five cases with amblyopia and 22 c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Guipan, Zhao, Congling, Ding, Qiang, Wang, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28169333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42043
_version_ 1782505233275944960
author Wang, Guipan
Zhao, Congling
Ding, Qiang
Wang, Ping
author_facet Wang, Guipan
Zhao, Congling
Ding, Qiang
Wang, Ping
author_sort Wang, Guipan
collection PubMed
description Both visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) are important parameters for measuring visual function. In this research, we investigated the CS of patients with ametropic or anisometropic amblyopia, whose corrected visual acuity (CVA) recovered to 1.0. Fifty-five cases with amblyopia and 22 control cases with a normal visual acuity of 1.0 were enrolled. The CS of the patients whose ametropic amblyopia had recovered to a CVA of 1.0 at 18 cpd spatial frequency was still lower than that of the normal control group under both photopic and scotopic conditions (P = 0.001, 0.025), but there were no significant differences at low- and middle-spatial frequencies. The CS of amblyopic eyes of the patients with anisometropic amblyopia was lower than that of the normal control group at the 18 cpd spatial frequency under photopic conditions (P = 0.005), and at the 6 cpd, 12 cpd, and 18 cpd spatial frequencies under scotopic conditions (P = 0.008, <0.001, 0.004, respectively). The CS between the amblyopic eyes and the sound eyes of patients with anisometropic amblyopia presented significant differences at the 6 cpd, 12 cpd, and 18 cpd spatial frequencies under scotopic conditions (P = 0.025, 0.045, 0.019, respectively). We suggest that amblyopia treatment should involve not only the correction of VA but also the improvement of CS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5294400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52944002017-02-10 An Assessment of the Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Ametropic and Anisometropic Amblyopia in Achieving the Corrected Visual Acuity of 1.0 Wang, Guipan Zhao, Congling Ding, Qiang Wang, Ping Sci Rep Article Both visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) are important parameters for measuring visual function. In this research, we investigated the CS of patients with ametropic or anisometropic amblyopia, whose corrected visual acuity (CVA) recovered to 1.0. Fifty-five cases with amblyopia and 22 control cases with a normal visual acuity of 1.0 were enrolled. The CS of the patients whose ametropic amblyopia had recovered to a CVA of 1.0 at 18 cpd spatial frequency was still lower than that of the normal control group under both photopic and scotopic conditions (P = 0.001, 0.025), but there were no significant differences at low- and middle-spatial frequencies. The CS of amblyopic eyes of the patients with anisometropic amblyopia was lower than that of the normal control group at the 18 cpd spatial frequency under photopic conditions (P = 0.005), and at the 6 cpd, 12 cpd, and 18 cpd spatial frequencies under scotopic conditions (P = 0.008, <0.001, 0.004, respectively). The CS between the amblyopic eyes and the sound eyes of patients with anisometropic amblyopia presented significant differences at the 6 cpd, 12 cpd, and 18 cpd spatial frequencies under scotopic conditions (P = 0.025, 0.045, 0.019, respectively). We suggest that amblyopia treatment should involve not only the correction of VA but also the improvement of CS. Nature Publishing Group 2017-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5294400/ /pubmed/28169333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42043 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Guipan
Zhao, Congling
Ding, Qiang
Wang, Ping
An Assessment of the Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Ametropic and Anisometropic Amblyopia in Achieving the Corrected Visual Acuity of 1.0
title An Assessment of the Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Ametropic and Anisometropic Amblyopia in Achieving the Corrected Visual Acuity of 1.0
title_full An Assessment of the Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Ametropic and Anisometropic Amblyopia in Achieving the Corrected Visual Acuity of 1.0
title_fullStr An Assessment of the Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Ametropic and Anisometropic Amblyopia in Achieving the Corrected Visual Acuity of 1.0
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment of the Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Ametropic and Anisometropic Amblyopia in Achieving the Corrected Visual Acuity of 1.0
title_short An Assessment of the Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Ametropic and Anisometropic Amblyopia in Achieving the Corrected Visual Acuity of 1.0
title_sort assessment of the contrast sensitivity in patients with ametropic and anisometropic amblyopia in achieving the corrected visual acuity of 1.0
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28169333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42043
work_keys_str_mv AT wangguipan anassessmentofthecontrastsensitivityinpatientswithametropicandanisometropicamblyopiainachievingthecorrectedvisualacuityof10
AT zhaocongling anassessmentofthecontrastsensitivityinpatientswithametropicandanisometropicamblyopiainachievingthecorrectedvisualacuityof10
AT dingqiang anassessmentofthecontrastsensitivityinpatientswithametropicandanisometropicamblyopiainachievingthecorrectedvisualacuityof10
AT wangping anassessmentofthecontrastsensitivityinpatientswithametropicandanisometropicamblyopiainachievingthecorrectedvisualacuityof10
AT wangguipan assessmentofthecontrastsensitivityinpatientswithametropicandanisometropicamblyopiainachievingthecorrectedvisualacuityof10
AT zhaocongling assessmentofthecontrastsensitivityinpatientswithametropicandanisometropicamblyopiainachievingthecorrectedvisualacuityof10
AT dingqiang assessmentofthecontrastsensitivityinpatientswithametropicandanisometropicamblyopiainachievingthecorrectedvisualacuityof10
AT wangping assessmentofthecontrastsensitivityinpatientswithametropicandanisometropicamblyopiainachievingthecorrectedvisualacuityof10