Cargando…
Comment on ‘Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome’
Autores principales: | Dell'Oglio, Paolo, Stabile, Armando, Gandaglia, Giorgio, Briganti, Alberto |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27780195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.346 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reply to ‘Comment on “Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome”’
por: Berney, Daniel M
Publicado: (2017) -
Active surveillance should not be routinely considered in ISUP grade group 2 prostate cancer
por: Gandaglia, Giorgio, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Most of patients with localized prostate cancer will be treated in the future? | Opinion: Yes
por: Dell’Oglio, Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Implementation of 4Kscore as a Secondary Test Before Prostate Biopsy: Impact on US Population Trends for Prostate Cancer
por: Scuderi, Simone, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome
por: Berney, Daniel M, et al.
Publicado: (2016)