Cargando…

The internal anatomy of titanosaur osteoderms from the Upper Cretaceous of Spain is compatible with a role in oogenesis

Dermal armor is one of the most intriguing features of some titanosaurs, the only sauropod dinosaurs that bore osteoderms. Some studies have revealed cavities of varying sizes inside some titanosaur osteoderms, interpreted as the result of bone remodeling for mineral mobilization. Several hypotheses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vidal, Daniel, Ortega, Francisco, Gascó, Francisco, Serrano-Martínez, Alejandro, Sanz, José Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28169348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42035
_version_ 1782505267932430336
author Vidal, Daniel
Ortega, Francisco
Gascó, Francisco
Serrano-Martínez, Alejandro
Sanz, José Luis
author_facet Vidal, Daniel
Ortega, Francisco
Gascó, Francisco
Serrano-Martínez, Alejandro
Sanz, José Luis
author_sort Vidal, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Dermal armor is one of the most intriguing features of some titanosaurs, the only sauropod dinosaurs that bore osteoderms. Some studies have revealed cavities of varying sizes inside some titanosaur osteoderms, interpreted as the result of bone remodeling for mineral mobilization. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the need for mineral mobilization in titanosaurs. However, rejecting those hypotheses was difficult with hitherto available evidence. The Upper Cretaceous site of Lo Hueco (Cuenca; Spain) has yielded one of the largest titanosaur osteoderm sets available. Observation of pre-existing breakages in the fossils and CT-scanning have revealed a predominant internal channel network for bulb and root osteoderms: most had a very compact spongy bone core, perfused by large longitudinal branching neurovascular canals. Only few osteoderms from the same bed, which was deposited in a single and short event, had areas with low-density spongy bone. This void-like low-density bone is always associated with internal channels. It is also present in osteoderms of different sizes. This scenario is best explained when considering that Lo Hueco titanosaurs might have used their osteoderms as a source of calcium that was mobilized during oogenesis, although other hypotheses cannot be completely ruled out.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5294579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52945792017-02-10 The internal anatomy of titanosaur osteoderms from the Upper Cretaceous of Spain is compatible with a role in oogenesis Vidal, Daniel Ortega, Francisco Gascó, Francisco Serrano-Martínez, Alejandro Sanz, José Luis Sci Rep Article Dermal armor is one of the most intriguing features of some titanosaurs, the only sauropod dinosaurs that bore osteoderms. Some studies have revealed cavities of varying sizes inside some titanosaur osteoderms, interpreted as the result of bone remodeling for mineral mobilization. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the need for mineral mobilization in titanosaurs. However, rejecting those hypotheses was difficult with hitherto available evidence. The Upper Cretaceous site of Lo Hueco (Cuenca; Spain) has yielded one of the largest titanosaur osteoderm sets available. Observation of pre-existing breakages in the fossils and CT-scanning have revealed a predominant internal channel network for bulb and root osteoderms: most had a very compact spongy bone core, perfused by large longitudinal branching neurovascular canals. Only few osteoderms from the same bed, which was deposited in a single and short event, had areas with low-density spongy bone. This void-like low-density bone is always associated with internal channels. It is also present in osteoderms of different sizes. This scenario is best explained when considering that Lo Hueco titanosaurs might have used their osteoderms as a source of calcium that was mobilized during oogenesis, although other hypotheses cannot be completely ruled out. Nature Publishing Group 2017-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5294579/ /pubmed/28169348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42035 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Vidal, Daniel
Ortega, Francisco
Gascó, Francisco
Serrano-Martínez, Alejandro
Sanz, José Luis
The internal anatomy of titanosaur osteoderms from the Upper Cretaceous of Spain is compatible with a role in oogenesis
title The internal anatomy of titanosaur osteoderms from the Upper Cretaceous of Spain is compatible with a role in oogenesis
title_full The internal anatomy of titanosaur osteoderms from the Upper Cretaceous of Spain is compatible with a role in oogenesis
title_fullStr The internal anatomy of titanosaur osteoderms from the Upper Cretaceous of Spain is compatible with a role in oogenesis
title_full_unstemmed The internal anatomy of titanosaur osteoderms from the Upper Cretaceous of Spain is compatible with a role in oogenesis
title_short The internal anatomy of titanosaur osteoderms from the Upper Cretaceous of Spain is compatible with a role in oogenesis
title_sort internal anatomy of titanosaur osteoderms from the upper cretaceous of spain is compatible with a role in oogenesis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28169348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42035
work_keys_str_mv AT vidaldaniel theinternalanatomyoftitanosaurosteodermsfromtheuppercretaceousofspainiscompatiblewitharoleinoogenesis
AT ortegafrancisco theinternalanatomyoftitanosaurosteodermsfromtheuppercretaceousofspainiscompatiblewitharoleinoogenesis
AT gascofrancisco theinternalanatomyoftitanosaurosteodermsfromtheuppercretaceousofspainiscompatiblewitharoleinoogenesis
AT serranomartinezalejandro theinternalanatomyoftitanosaurosteodermsfromtheuppercretaceousofspainiscompatiblewitharoleinoogenesis
AT sanzjoseluis theinternalanatomyoftitanosaurosteodermsfromtheuppercretaceousofspainiscompatiblewitharoleinoogenesis
AT vidaldaniel internalanatomyoftitanosaurosteodermsfromtheuppercretaceousofspainiscompatiblewitharoleinoogenesis
AT ortegafrancisco internalanatomyoftitanosaurosteodermsfromtheuppercretaceousofspainiscompatiblewitharoleinoogenesis
AT gascofrancisco internalanatomyoftitanosaurosteodermsfromtheuppercretaceousofspainiscompatiblewitharoleinoogenesis
AT serranomartinezalejandro internalanatomyoftitanosaurosteodermsfromtheuppercretaceousofspainiscompatiblewitharoleinoogenesis
AT sanzjoseluis internalanatomyoftitanosaurosteodermsfromtheuppercretaceousofspainiscompatiblewitharoleinoogenesis