Cargando…

A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition

BACKGROUND: Vasectomy techniques have been the subject of relatively few rigorous studies. The objective of this analysis was to compare the effectiveness of two techniques for vas occlusion: intraluminal cautery versus ligation and excision with fascial interposition. More specifically, we aimed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sokal, David, Irsula, Belinda, Chen-Mok, Mario, Labrecque, Michel, Barone, Mark A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC529470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15509302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-4-12
_version_ 1782121984962854912
author Sokal, David
Irsula, Belinda
Chen-Mok, Mario
Labrecque, Michel
Barone, Mark A
author_facet Sokal, David
Irsula, Belinda
Chen-Mok, Mario
Labrecque, Michel
Barone, Mark A
author_sort Sokal, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vasectomy techniques have been the subject of relatively few rigorous studies. The objective of this analysis was to compare the effectiveness of two techniques for vas occlusion: intraluminal cautery versus ligation and excision with fascial interposition. More specifically, we aimed to compare early failure rates, sperm concentrations, and time to success between the two techniques. METHODS: We compared semen analysis data from men following vasectomy using two occlusion techniques. Data on intraluminal cautery came from a prospective observational study conducted at four sites. Data on ligation and excision with fascial interposition came from a multicenter randomized controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy of ligation and excision with versus without fascial interposition. The surgical techniques used in the fascial interposition study were standardized. The surgeons in the cautery study used their customary techniques, which varied among sites in terms of type of cautery, use of fascial interposition, excision of a short segment of the vas, and use of an open-ended technique. Men in both studies had semen analyses two weeks after vasectomy and then approximately every four weeks. The two outcome measures for the analyses presented here are (a) time to success, defined as severe oligozoospermia, or <100,000 sperm/mL in two consecutive semen analyses; and (b) early vasectomy failure, defined as >10 million sperm/mL at week 12 or later. RESULTS: Vasectomy with cautery was associated with a significantly more rapid progression to severe oligozoospermia and with significantly fewer early failures (1% versus 5%). CONCLUSION: The use of cautery improves vasectomy outcomes. Limitations of this comparison include (a) the variety of surgical techniques in the cautery study and differences in methods of fascial interposition between the two studies, (b) the uncertain correlation between sperm concentrations after vasectomy and the risk of pregnancy, and (c) the use of historical controls and different study sites.
format Text
id pubmed-529470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5294702004-11-21 A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition Sokal, David Irsula, Belinda Chen-Mok, Mario Labrecque, Michel Barone, Mark A BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Vasectomy techniques have been the subject of relatively few rigorous studies. The objective of this analysis was to compare the effectiveness of two techniques for vas occlusion: intraluminal cautery versus ligation and excision with fascial interposition. More specifically, we aimed to compare early failure rates, sperm concentrations, and time to success between the two techniques. METHODS: We compared semen analysis data from men following vasectomy using two occlusion techniques. Data on intraluminal cautery came from a prospective observational study conducted at four sites. Data on ligation and excision with fascial interposition came from a multicenter randomized controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy of ligation and excision with versus without fascial interposition. The surgical techniques used in the fascial interposition study were standardized. The surgeons in the cautery study used their customary techniques, which varied among sites in terms of type of cautery, use of fascial interposition, excision of a short segment of the vas, and use of an open-ended technique. Men in both studies had semen analyses two weeks after vasectomy and then approximately every four weeks. The two outcome measures for the analyses presented here are (a) time to success, defined as severe oligozoospermia, or <100,000 sperm/mL in two consecutive semen analyses; and (b) early vasectomy failure, defined as >10 million sperm/mL at week 12 or later. RESULTS: Vasectomy with cautery was associated with a significantly more rapid progression to severe oligozoospermia and with significantly fewer early failures (1% versus 5%). CONCLUSION: The use of cautery improves vasectomy outcomes. Limitations of this comparison include (a) the variety of surgical techniques in the cautery study and differences in methods of fascial interposition between the two studies, (b) the uncertain correlation between sperm concentrations after vasectomy and the risk of pregnancy, and (c) the use of historical controls and different study sites. BioMed Central 2004-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC529470/ /pubmed/15509302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-4-12 Text en Copyright © 2004 Sokal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sokal, David
Irsula, Belinda
Chen-Mok, Mario
Labrecque, Michel
Barone, Mark A
A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition
title A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition
title_full A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition
title_fullStr A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition
title_short A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition
title_sort comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC529470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15509302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-4-12
work_keys_str_mv AT sokaldavid acomparisonofvasocclusiontechniquescauterymoreeffectivethanligationandexcisionwithfascialinterposition
AT irsulabelinda acomparisonofvasocclusiontechniquescauterymoreeffectivethanligationandexcisionwithfascialinterposition
AT chenmokmario acomparisonofvasocclusiontechniquescauterymoreeffectivethanligationandexcisionwithfascialinterposition
AT labrecquemichel acomparisonofvasocclusiontechniquescauterymoreeffectivethanligationandexcisionwithfascialinterposition
AT baronemarka acomparisonofvasocclusiontechniquescauterymoreeffectivethanligationandexcisionwithfascialinterposition
AT sokaldavid comparisonofvasocclusiontechniquescauterymoreeffectivethanligationandexcisionwithfascialinterposition
AT irsulabelinda comparisonofvasocclusiontechniquescauterymoreeffectivethanligationandexcisionwithfascialinterposition
AT chenmokmario comparisonofvasocclusiontechniquescauterymoreeffectivethanligationandexcisionwithfascialinterposition
AT labrecquemichel comparisonofvasocclusiontechniquescauterymoreeffectivethanligationandexcisionwithfascialinterposition
AT baronemarka comparisonofvasocclusiontechniquescauterymoreeffectivethanligationandexcisionwithfascialinterposition