Cargando…

Is endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stent insertion a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm?

A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stents (MFMS) can be considered a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoraco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinto, Carolline, Garas, George, Harling, Leanne, Darzi, Ara, Casula, Roberto, Athanasiou, Thanos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.020
_version_ 1782505291071356928
author Pinto, Carolline
Garas, George
Harling, Leanne
Darzi, Ara
Casula, Roberto
Athanasiou, Thanos
author_facet Pinto, Carolline
Garas, George
Harling, Leanne
Darzi, Ara
Casula, Roberto
Athanasiou, Thanos
author_sort Pinto, Carolline
collection PubMed
description A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stents (MFMS) can be considered a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). Altogether 27 papers were identified using the reported search, of which 11 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study limitations are tabulated. The outcomes of interest were all-cause survival, aneurysm-related survival, branch vessel patency and major adverse events. Aneurysm-related survival exceeded 78% in almost all studies, with the exception of one where the MFMS was inserted outside the instructions for use. In that study the aneurysm-related survival was 28.9%. The branch vessel patency was higher than 95% in 10 studies and not reported in one. At 12-month follow-up, several studies showed a low incidence of major adverse events, including stroke, paraplegia and aneurysm rupture. We conclude that MFMS represent a suitable and safe treatment for high-risk patients with TAAA maintaining branch vessel patency when used within their instructions for use. However, a number of limitations must be considered when interpreting this evidence, particularly the complete lack of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), short follow-up in all studies, and heterogeneity of the pathologies among the different populations studied. Further innovative developments are needed to improve MFMS safety, expand their instructions for use, and enhance their efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5294718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52947182017-02-15 Is endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stent insertion a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm? Pinto, Carolline Garas, George Harling, Leanne Darzi, Ara Casula, Roberto Athanasiou, Thanos Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stents (MFMS) can be considered a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). Altogether 27 papers were identified using the reported search, of which 11 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study limitations are tabulated. The outcomes of interest were all-cause survival, aneurysm-related survival, branch vessel patency and major adverse events. Aneurysm-related survival exceeded 78% in almost all studies, with the exception of one where the MFMS was inserted outside the instructions for use. In that study the aneurysm-related survival was 28.9%. The branch vessel patency was higher than 95% in 10 studies and not reported in one. At 12-month follow-up, several studies showed a low incidence of major adverse events, including stroke, paraplegia and aneurysm rupture. We conclude that MFMS represent a suitable and safe treatment for high-risk patients with TAAA maintaining branch vessel patency when used within their instructions for use. However, a number of limitations must be considered when interpreting this evidence, particularly the complete lack of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), short follow-up in all studies, and heterogeneity of the pathologies among the different populations studied. Further innovative developments are needed to improve MFMS safety, expand their instructions for use, and enhance their efficacy. Elsevier 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5294718/ /pubmed/28203369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.020 Text en © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Pinto, Carolline
Garas, George
Harling, Leanne
Darzi, Ara
Casula, Roberto
Athanasiou, Thanos
Is endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stent insertion a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm?
title Is endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stent insertion a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm?
title_full Is endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stent insertion a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm?
title_fullStr Is endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stent insertion a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm?
title_full_unstemmed Is endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stent insertion a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm?
title_short Is endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stent insertion a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm?
title_sort is endovascular treatment with multilayer flow modulator stent insertion a safe alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.020
work_keys_str_mv AT pintocarolline isendovasculartreatmentwithmultilayerflowmodulatorstentinsertionasafealternativetoopensurgeryforhighriskpatientswiththoracoabdominalaorticaneurysm
AT garasgeorge isendovasculartreatmentwithmultilayerflowmodulatorstentinsertionasafealternativetoopensurgeryforhighriskpatientswiththoracoabdominalaorticaneurysm
AT harlingleanne isendovasculartreatmentwithmultilayerflowmodulatorstentinsertionasafealternativetoopensurgeryforhighriskpatientswiththoracoabdominalaorticaneurysm
AT darziara isendovasculartreatmentwithmultilayerflowmodulatorstentinsertionasafealternativetoopensurgeryforhighriskpatientswiththoracoabdominalaorticaneurysm
AT casularoberto isendovasculartreatmentwithmultilayerflowmodulatorstentinsertionasafealternativetoopensurgeryforhighriskpatientswiththoracoabdominalaorticaneurysm
AT athanasiouthanos isendovasculartreatmentwithmultilayerflowmodulatorstentinsertionasafealternativetoopensurgeryforhighriskpatientswiththoracoabdominalaorticaneurysm