Cargando…

Speechreading in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Perceptual Compensation

Previous research has provided evidence for a speechreading advantage in congenitally deaf adults compared to hearing adults. A ‘perceptual compensation’ account of this finding proposes that prolonged early onset deafness leads to a greater reliance on visual, as opposed to auditory, information wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pimperton, Hannah, Ralph-Lewis, Amelia, MacSweeney, Mairéad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28223951
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00106
_version_ 1782505302162145280
author Pimperton, Hannah
Ralph-Lewis, Amelia
MacSweeney, Mairéad
author_facet Pimperton, Hannah
Ralph-Lewis, Amelia
MacSweeney, Mairéad
author_sort Pimperton, Hannah
collection PubMed
description Previous research has provided evidence for a speechreading advantage in congenitally deaf adults compared to hearing adults. A ‘perceptual compensation’ account of this finding proposes that prolonged early onset deafness leads to a greater reliance on visual, as opposed to auditory, information when perceiving speech which in turn results in superior visual speech perception skills in deaf adults. In the current study we tested whether previous demonstrations of a speechreading advantage for profoundly congenitally deaf adults with hearing aids, or no amplificiation, were also apparent in adults with the same deafness profile but who have experienced greater access to the auditory elements of speech via a cochlear implant (CI). We also tested the prediction that, in line with the perceptual compensation account, receiving a CI at a later age is associated with superior speechreading skills due to later implanted individuals having experienced greater dependence on visual speech information. We designed a speechreading task in which participants viewed silent videos of 123 single words spoken by a model and were required to indicate which word they thought had been said via a free text response. We compared congenitally deaf adults who had received CIs in childhood or adolescence (N = 15) with a comparison group of hearing adults (N = 15) matched on age and education level. The adults with CI showed significantly better scores on the speechreading task than the hearing comparison group. Furthermore, within the group of adults with CI, there was a significant positive correlation between age at implantation and speechreading performance; earlier implantation was associated with lower speechreading scores. These results are both consistent with the hypothesis of perceptual compensation in the domain of speech perception, indicating that more prolonged dependence on visual speech information in speech perception may lead to improvements in the perception of visual speech. In addition our study provides metrics of the ‘speechreadability’ of 123 words produced in British English: one derived from hearing adults (N = 61) and one from deaf adults with CI (N = 15). Evidence for the validity of these ‘speechreadability’ metrics come from correlations with visual lexical competition data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5294775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52947752017-02-21 Speechreading in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Perceptual Compensation Pimperton, Hannah Ralph-Lewis, Amelia MacSweeney, Mairéad Front Psychol Psychology Previous research has provided evidence for a speechreading advantage in congenitally deaf adults compared to hearing adults. A ‘perceptual compensation’ account of this finding proposes that prolonged early onset deafness leads to a greater reliance on visual, as opposed to auditory, information when perceiving speech which in turn results in superior visual speech perception skills in deaf adults. In the current study we tested whether previous demonstrations of a speechreading advantage for profoundly congenitally deaf adults with hearing aids, or no amplificiation, were also apparent in adults with the same deafness profile but who have experienced greater access to the auditory elements of speech via a cochlear implant (CI). We also tested the prediction that, in line with the perceptual compensation account, receiving a CI at a later age is associated with superior speechreading skills due to later implanted individuals having experienced greater dependence on visual speech information. We designed a speechreading task in which participants viewed silent videos of 123 single words spoken by a model and were required to indicate which word they thought had been said via a free text response. We compared congenitally deaf adults who had received CIs in childhood or adolescence (N = 15) with a comparison group of hearing adults (N = 15) matched on age and education level. The adults with CI showed significantly better scores on the speechreading task than the hearing comparison group. Furthermore, within the group of adults with CI, there was a significant positive correlation between age at implantation and speechreading performance; earlier implantation was associated with lower speechreading scores. These results are both consistent with the hypothesis of perceptual compensation in the domain of speech perception, indicating that more prolonged dependence on visual speech information in speech perception may lead to improvements in the perception of visual speech. In addition our study provides metrics of the ‘speechreadability’ of 123 words produced in British English: one derived from hearing adults (N = 61) and one from deaf adults with CI (N = 15). Evidence for the validity of these ‘speechreadability’ metrics come from correlations with visual lexical competition data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5294775/ /pubmed/28223951 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00106 Text en Copyright © 2017 Pimperton, Ralph-Lewis and MacSweeney. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Pimperton, Hannah
Ralph-Lewis, Amelia
MacSweeney, Mairéad
Speechreading in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Perceptual Compensation
title Speechreading in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Perceptual Compensation
title_full Speechreading in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Perceptual Compensation
title_fullStr Speechreading in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Perceptual Compensation
title_full_unstemmed Speechreading in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Perceptual Compensation
title_short Speechreading in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Perceptual Compensation
title_sort speechreading in deaf adults with cochlear implants: evidence for perceptual compensation
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28223951
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00106
work_keys_str_mv AT pimpertonhannah speechreadingindeafadultswithcochlearimplantsevidenceforperceptualcompensation
AT ralphlewisamelia speechreadingindeafadultswithcochlearimplantsevidenceforperceptualcompensation
AT macsweeneymairead speechreadingindeafadultswithcochlearimplantsevidenceforperceptualcompensation