Cargando…

Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS: Iatrogenic colonoscopy perforations (ICP) are a rare but severe complication of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopies. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the operative and post-operative outcomes of laparoscopy vs. open surgery performed for the management o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martínez-Pérez, Aleix, de’Angelis, Nicola, Brunetti, Francesco, Le Baleur, Yann, Payá-Llorente, Carmen, Memeo, Riccardo, Gaiani, Federica, Manfredi, Marco, Gavriilidis, Paschalis, Nervi, Giorgio, Coccolini, Federico, Amiot, Aurelien, Sobhani, Iradj, Catena, Fausto, de’Angelis, Gian Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28184237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0121-x
_version_ 1782505314435727360
author Martínez-Pérez, Aleix
de’Angelis, Nicola
Brunetti, Francesco
Le Baleur, Yann
Payá-Llorente, Carmen
Memeo, Riccardo
Gaiani, Federica
Manfredi, Marco
Gavriilidis, Paschalis
Nervi, Giorgio
Coccolini, Federico
Amiot, Aurelien
Sobhani, Iradj
Catena, Fausto
de’Angelis, Gian Luigi
author_facet Martínez-Pérez, Aleix
de’Angelis, Nicola
Brunetti, Francesco
Le Baleur, Yann
Payá-Llorente, Carmen
Memeo, Riccardo
Gaiani, Federica
Manfredi, Marco
Gavriilidis, Paschalis
Nervi, Giorgio
Coccolini, Federico
Amiot, Aurelien
Sobhani, Iradj
Catena, Fausto
de’Angelis, Gian Luigi
author_sort Martínez-Pérez, Aleix
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Iatrogenic colonoscopy perforations (ICP) are a rare but severe complication of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopies. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the operative and post-operative outcomes of laparoscopy vs. open surgery performed for the management of ICP. METHODS: A literature search was carried out on Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases from January 1990 to June 2016. Clinical studies comparing the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgical procedures for the treatment for ICP were retrieved and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 6 retrospective studies were selected, including 161 patients with ICP who underwent surgery. Laparoscopy was used in 55% of the patients, with a conversion rate of 10%. The meta-analysis shows that the laparoscopic approach was associated with significantly fewer post-operative complications compared to open surgery (18.2% vs. 53.5% respectively; Relative risk, RR: 0.32 [95%CI: 0.19–0.54; p < 0.0001; I(2) = 0%]) and shorter hospital stay (mean difference −5.35 days [95%CI: −6.94 to −3.76; p < 0.00001; I(2) = 0%]). No differences between the two surgical approaches were observed for postoperative mortality, need of re-intervention, and operative time. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the outcomes of the surgical management of an endoscopic complication that is not yet considered in clinical guidelines. Based on the current available literature, the laparoscopic approach appears to provide better outcomes in terms of postoperative complications and length of hospital stay than open surgery in the case of ICP surgical repair. However, the creation of large prospective registries of patients with ICP would be a step forward in addressing the lack of evidence concerning the surgical treatment of this endoscopic complication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13017-017-0121-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5294829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52948292017-02-09 Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis Martínez-Pérez, Aleix de’Angelis, Nicola Brunetti, Francesco Le Baleur, Yann Payá-Llorente, Carmen Memeo, Riccardo Gaiani, Federica Manfredi, Marco Gavriilidis, Paschalis Nervi, Giorgio Coccolini, Federico Amiot, Aurelien Sobhani, Iradj Catena, Fausto de’Angelis, Gian Luigi World J Emerg Surg Review AIMS: Iatrogenic colonoscopy perforations (ICP) are a rare but severe complication of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopies. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the operative and post-operative outcomes of laparoscopy vs. open surgery performed for the management of ICP. METHODS: A literature search was carried out on Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases from January 1990 to June 2016. Clinical studies comparing the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgical procedures for the treatment for ICP were retrieved and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 6 retrospective studies were selected, including 161 patients with ICP who underwent surgery. Laparoscopy was used in 55% of the patients, with a conversion rate of 10%. The meta-analysis shows that the laparoscopic approach was associated with significantly fewer post-operative complications compared to open surgery (18.2% vs. 53.5% respectively; Relative risk, RR: 0.32 [95%CI: 0.19–0.54; p < 0.0001; I(2) = 0%]) and shorter hospital stay (mean difference −5.35 days [95%CI: −6.94 to −3.76; p < 0.00001; I(2) = 0%]). No differences between the two surgical approaches were observed for postoperative mortality, need of re-intervention, and operative time. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the outcomes of the surgical management of an endoscopic complication that is not yet considered in clinical guidelines. Based on the current available literature, the laparoscopic approach appears to provide better outcomes in terms of postoperative complications and length of hospital stay than open surgery in the case of ICP surgical repair. However, the creation of large prospective registries of patients with ICP would be a step forward in addressing the lack of evidence concerning the surgical treatment of this endoscopic complication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13017-017-0121-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5294829/ /pubmed/28184237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0121-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Martínez-Pérez, Aleix
de’Angelis, Nicola
Brunetti, Francesco
Le Baleur, Yann
Payá-Llorente, Carmen
Memeo, Riccardo
Gaiani, Federica
Manfredi, Marco
Gavriilidis, Paschalis
Nervi, Giorgio
Coccolini, Federico
Amiot, Aurelien
Sobhani, Iradj
Catena, Fausto
de’Angelis, Gian Luigi
Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5294829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28184237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0121-x
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezperezaleix laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT deangelisnicola laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT brunettifrancesco laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lebaleuryann laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT payallorentecarmen laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT memeoriccardo laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaianifederica laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT manfredimarco laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gavriilidispaschalis laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nervigiorgio laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT coccolinifederico laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT amiotaurelien laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sobhaniiradj laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT catenafausto laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT deangelisgianluigi laparoscopicvsopensurgeryforthetreatmentofiatrogeniccolonoscopicperforationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis